The role of botulinum toxin injection and upper esophageal sphincter myotomy in treating oropharyngeal dysphagia.

The aims of this study were to assess the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin (BoTox) injection in the cricopharyngeus muscle (CP) and CP myotomy in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) and to identify factors predicting the outcome of these treatments. The study involved patients with persistent OPD despite 2-6 months of rehabilitation, who all underwent clinical evaluation, esophageal manometry, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and videofluoroscopy (VFS). Patients received 5-10 BoTox units injections in the CP, identified by electromyography. Surgical myotomy of the upper esophageal sphincter was performed when dysphagia persisted after two BoTox injections. After treatment, patients were reevaluated with clinical interviews and VFS. The study population included 21 patients (15 mean and 6 women; median age, 68 years), classified into three groups, based on the etiology of their OPD: eight (38%) had central nervous system abnormalities, five (24%) had peripheral nerve disease, and eight (38%) were classified as idiopathic. The median time since the onset of dysphagia was 18 months. Thirteen of 21 patients (62%) needed supplemental/total gastrostomy feeding, and 5 of 21 (24%) had tracheostomy. One patient died, on posttreatment day 7, due to massive aspiration. No other BoTox-related complications were observed. After BoTox injection, dysphagia improved in 9 of 21 (43%) patients. Severely altered VFS findings and CP incoordination or low activity predicted BoTox failure at multivariate analysis. Dysphagia improved in 8 of 11 (72.7%) patients who failed to respond to BoTox and underwent myotomy. A mild impairment of VFS findings and a higher pressure of pharyngeal contractions best predicted response to BoTox with or without myotomy. BoTox injection can be used as the first therapeutic option in patients with OPD: it is safe and simple and relieves dysphagia in 43% of cases. If BoTox fails, CP myotomy can be offered to patients with preserved oral and tongue activity at VFS and an intact bolus propulsion ability on manometry.

Randomized controlled trial of botulinum toxin versus laparoscopic heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare laparoscopic cardia myotomy and fundoplication with botulinum toxin (BoTx) injection in patients with esophageal achalasia. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although myotomy is thought to offer better results, recent studies have reported 80% success rates after 2 BoTx injections a month apart. No randomized controlled trials comparing the 2 treatments have been published so far. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Newly diagnosed achalasia patients were randomly assigned to BoTx injection or laparoscopic myotomy. Symptoms were scored; lower esophageal sphincter resting and nadir pressures were measured by manometry; barium swallow was used to assess esophageal diameter pre- and post-treatment. Eight to one hundred units of BoTx were injected twice, a month apart, at the esophagogastric junction. Myotomy included anterior partial (Dor) or Nissen fundoplication. RESULTS: Eighty patients were involved in the study: 40 received BoTx and 40 underwent myotomy. Mortality was nil. One surgical patient bled from the trocar site. Median hospital stay was 6 days for surgery; BoTox patients were treated as day-hospital admissions. All patients completed the follow-up. After 6 months, the results in the 2 groups were comparable, although symptom scores improved more in surgical patients (82% confidence interval [CI] 76-89 vs. 66% CI 57-75, P < 0.05). The drop in lower esophageal sphincter pressure was similar in the 2 groups; the reduction in esophageal diameter was greater after surgery (19% CI 13-26 vs. 5% CI 2-11, P < 0.05). Later on, symptoms recurred in 65% of the BoTx-treated patients and the probability of being symptom-free at 2 years was 87.5% after surgery and 34% after BoTx (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic myotomy is as safe as BoTx treatment and is a 1-shot treatment that cures achalasia in most patients. BoTx should be reserved for patients who are unfit for surgery or as a bridge to more effective therapies, such as surgery or endoscopic dilation.

Esophageal achalasia: is the herpes simplex virus really innocent?

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that mononuclear cells in the myenteric plexus of patients with achalasia may be activated by herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). Strips of esophageal muscle were obtained from patients with achalasia and multiorgan transplant donors who served as control subjects. After muscle digestion, mononuclear cells were purified through a Percoll gradient and cultured in medium, either alone or containing ultraviolet-inactivated HSV-1 or poliovirus (multiplicity of infection 1:1.5). As an indicator of HSV-1-induced lymphocyte activation, we determined T-cell proliferation by means of 3H-thymidine incorporation and interferon gamma release. DNA was extracted from esophageal muscle of achalasia patients and control subjects, and used as a template for PCR analysis using primer pairs specific for HSV-1. Circulating anti-HSV-1 and HSV-2 antibodies were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on serum samples. Fifteen patients with naive achalasia and eight control subjects were studied. The prevalence of circulating anti-HSV-1 and HSV-2 antibodies proved similar in the two groups, and no HSV-1 DNA was detected by polyermase chain reaction in the esophageal muscle samples. The proliferative index in mononuclear cells from achalasia patients stimulated with HSV-1 showed a 3.4-fold increase in comparison with control subjects (P<0.01). In addition, a 1.4-fold increase in interferon gamma release after incubation with HSV-1 was observed in cells from achalasia patients but not control subjects. The results of this study indicate that HSV-1-reactive immune cells are present in lower esophageal sphincter muscles of patients with achalasia. We hypothesize that the HSV-1-reactive lymphocytes in lower esophageal sphincter muscles of achalasia patients may contribute to damage of the neurons in the myenteric plexus and lead to the motor dysfunction.

Etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of failures after laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the causes of failure of laparoscopic Heller myotomy and to verify whether endoscopic pneumatic dilation is a feasible treatment. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy has proved an effective treatment for esophageal achalasia, with good or excellent results in 90% of patients. The treatment of failures remains controversial, however. METHODS: From 1992 to 1999, 113 patients underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia. Ten patients (8.7%) reported dysphagia (n = 7) or chest pain (n = 3) a median of 5 months after surgery (range 1-12) and were considered surgical failures. Pre- and postoperative radiologic, manometric, and 24-hour pH monitoring findings in patients with achalasia recurrence were compared with those of 74 asymptomatic subjects. RESULTS: The preoperative characteristics of the two groups were comparable. After surgery, a decrease in resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure was observed in both groups, whereas the abdominal and overall lengths were significantly shorter among the asymptomatic patients. No patients with recurrence had abnormal gastroesophageal reflux. Based on time to recurrence and manometric and fluoroscopic findings, the etiology of the recurrences was classified as incomplete myotomy upward (n = 1), incomplete myotomy or sclerosis of the myotomy downward (n = 7), or sigmoid megaesophagus (n = 1); in one patient the authors could not establish the etiology. Seven of nine patients were effectively treated with endoscopic pneumatic dilations (median 2 dilations, range 1-4); one refused to undergo further treatment. Two patients underwent redo surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence of symptoms after myotomy is mainly related to incomplete myotomy or sclerosis of the distal site of the myotomy; it can be treated by dilations after surgery.