RESUMO
This article presents a review of the literature relating to iontophoresis. This technique has been used in physical therapy to introduce ionic medications through the skin, primarily for a local effect. Recently, there has been increased interest in using this technique for the transdermal delivery of medications, both ionic and nonionic. This article includes an overview of the history of iontophoresis and a discussion of the physico-chemical and biological factors affecting iontophoretic drug transfer for both local and systemic effects. Factors affecting skin injury and techniques for optimizing iontophoretic drug delivery through the use of current modulation, electrode construction, and skin permeation enhancers are also discussed. Clinical applications of iontophoresis in physical therapy and the pharmacology of selected medications are presented. Thoughts for future potential uses of this technique and needs for further research are also discussed.
Assuntos
Iontoforese , Preparações Farmacêuticas/administração & dosagem , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Queimaduras/etiologia , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Hialuronoglucosaminidase/administração & dosagem , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Iontoforese/efeitos adversos , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Absorção Cutânea , Vasodilatadores/administração & dosagemRESUMO
The assumption that the inverted-U hypothesis, which shows performance as a function of activation level, mediates the relationship between achievement anxiety and academic test performance was tested by comparing Achievement Anxiety Test scores of 75 male and female college students with a self-report measure of activation taken prior to a classroom examination. Results supported the predicted relationship between achievement anxiety reaction type and academic performance (rho less than .05), but only partially supported the inverted-U hypothesis posited to account for this relationship. Results were further interpreted as suggesting that examinees experience two general types of arousal in the testing situationone type that enhances performance and one that impedes performance. Further implications of the results were discussed.