Prioridades de investigación en términos de fluidoterapia perioperatoria y monitorización hemodinámica: encuesta de consenso Delphi del Subcomité de Fluidoterapia y Monitorización hemodinámica de la Sección de Hemostasia, Medicina Transfusional y Fluidoterapia (SHTF) de la Sociedad española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (SEDAR) / Research priorities in perioperative fluid therapy and hemodynamic monitoring: A Delphi Consensus Survey from the Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring Subcommittee of the Hemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy Section (SHTF) of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Critical Care (SEDAR)

Antecedentes: La investigación sobre fluidoterapia y monitorización hemodinámica perioperatorias es difícil y costosa. Los objetivos del presente estudio fueron resumir y priorizar estas cuestiones, en orden de importancia investigadora. Métodos: Cuestionario estructurado electrónico Delphi a lo largo de tres rondas entre 30 expertos en fluidoterapia y monitorización hemodinámica identificados a través del Subcomité de Fluidoterapia y Monitorización hemodinámica de la Sección de Hemostasia, Medicina Transfusional y Fluidoterapia de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación. Resultados: Se identificaron 77 cuestiones, que se clasificaron en orden de priorización. Las cuestiones se categorizaron en temas de cristaloides, coloides, monitorización hemodinámica y otros. Se categorizaron 31 cuestiones como de prioridad investigadora esencial, para determinar si los algoritmos de optimización hemodinámica intraoperatorios basados en el índice de predicción de hipotensión invasivo o no invasivo frente a otras estrategias de manejo podrían reducir la incidencia de complicaciones postoperatorias, así como si el uso de biomarcadores del estrés renal junto con un protocolo de fluidoterapia dirigido por objetivos podría reducir la estancia hospitalaria y la incidencia de insuficiencia renal aguda en pacientes adultos sometidos a cirugía no cardiaca, lográndose el más alto consenso. Conclusiones: El Subcomité de Fluidoterapia y Monitorización hemodinámica de la Sección de Hemostasia, Medicina Transfusional y Fluidoterapia de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación utilizará estos resultados para la realización de investigación.(AU)

Background: Research on perioperative fluid therapy and hemodynamic monitoring is difficult and expensive. The objectives of the present study were to summarize and prioritize these issues, in order of research importance. research importance. Methods: Structured electronic Delphi questionnaire over three rounds among 30 experts in fluid therapy and hemodynamic monitoring identified through the Subcommittee on Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring Subcommittee of the Hemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy Section of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation. Results: 77 issues were identified, which were ranked in order of prioritization. The were categorized into crystalloid, colloid, hemodynamic monitoring and others. and others. Thirty-one issues were categorized as of essential research priority, to determine whether intraoperative hemodynamic optimization algorithms based on the index of invasive or noninvasive hypotension prediction index versus other management strategies could reduce the incidence of postoperative reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, as well as whether the use of biomarkers of renal stress in conjunction biomarkers of renal stress in conjunction with a goal-directed fluid therapy protocol could reduce hospital stay and the hospital stay and the incidence of acute renal failure in adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, and whether the non-cardiac surgery, achieving the highest consensus. Conclusions: The Subcommittee on Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring of the Section of Hemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation will use these results for further research.(AU)

Research priorities in perioperative fluid therapy and hemodynamic monitoring: A Delphi Consensus Survey from the Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring Subcommittee of the Hemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy Section (SHTF) of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Critical Care (SEDAR).

BACKGROUND: Research in fluid therapy and perioperative hemodynamic monitoring is difficult and expensive. The objectives of this study were to summarize these topics and to prioritize these topics in order of research importance. METHODS: Electronic structured Delphi questionnaire over three rounds among 30 experts in fluid therapy and hemodynamic monitoring identified through the Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring Subcommittee of the Hemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy Section of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Critical Care. RESULTS: 77 topics were identified and ranked in order of prioritization. Topics were categorized into themes of crystalloids, colloids, hemodynamic monitoring and others. 31 topics were ranked as essential research priority. To determine whether intraoperative hemodynamic optimization algorithms based on the invasive or noninvasive Hypotension Prediction Index versus other management strategies could decrease the incidence of postoperative complications. As well as whether the use of renal stress biomarkers together with a goal-directed fluid therapy protocol could reduce hospital stay and the incidence of acute kidney injury in adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, reached the highest consensus. CONCLUSIONS: The Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring Subcommittee of the Hemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy Section of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Critical Care will use these results to carry out the research.

Blood purification in the critically ill patient. Prescription tailored to the indication (including the pediatric patient) / Depuración de la sangre en el enfermo crítico. Prescripción adaptada a la indicación (incluido el paciente pediátrico)

We maintain a dynamic position on extracorporeal blood purification therapies (EBPT). Continuous therapies are of choice in the hemodynamically unstable patient. We recommend their early introduction in the course of the disease, and starting with a dose of 30-35mL/kg/h. Above all, however, daily re-evaluation is required of the hemodynamic and metabolic situation and water balance of our patients in order to allow dynamic dose adjustment. Some data suggest that continuous EBPT can favorably influence the clinical course of our patients, even in the absence of acute kidney injury. The potential usefulness of hemofiltration at doses higher than the conventional doses (continuous ultrafiltration >50mL/kg/h or pulses of at least 4h a day to more than 100dosesmL/kg/h) for achieving blood purification has also been commented. We review the possible indications of this technique, together with the peculiarities of implementing these therapies in children

Creemos que las técnicas de depuración extracorpórea deben seguir un planteamiento dinámico. Las técnicas continuas son de elección en los pacientes hemodinámicamente inestables. Recomendamos un inicio precoz en el curso de la enfermedad y comenzar con una dosis de 30-35ml/kg/h. Pero, sobre todo, deberemos hacer una reevaluación diaria de la situación del paciente (hemodinámica, metabólica y del estado hidroelectrolítico) para ajustar la dosis de forma dinámica. Algunos datos evidencian que las técnicas de depuración extracorpórea continuas pueden influir favorablemente en la evolución del paciente crítico, independientemente de su función renal. Se comenta también la potencial utilidad de usar dosis de depuración superiores a las convencionales (hemofiltración superior a 50ml/kg/h o pulsos de al menos 4h diarias de más de 100ml/kg/h). Revisamos, asimismo, otras posibles indicaciones de las técnicas de depuración extracorpórea, así como las peculiaridades de su aplicación en pediatría

Blood purification in the critically ill patient. Prescription tailored to the indication (including the pediatric patient).

We maintain a dynamic position on extracorporeal blood purification therapies (EBPT). Continuous therapies are of choice in the hemodynamically unstable patient. We recommend their early introduction in the course of the disease, and starting with a dose of 30-35mL/kg/h. Above all, however, daily re-evaluation is required of the hemodynamic and metabolic situation and water balance of our patients in order to allow dynamic dose adjustment. Some data suggest that continuous EBPT can favorably influence the clinical course of our patients, even in the absence of acute kidney injury. The potential usefulness of hemofiltration at doses higher than the conventional doses (continuous ultrafiltration >50mL/kg/h or pulses of at least 4h a day to more than 100dosesmL/kg/h) for achieving blood purification has also been commented. We review the possible indications of this technique, together with the peculiarities of implementing these therapies in children.

Plasmapheresis as treatment for hyperlipidemic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Severe hypertriglyceridemia with an accumulation of chylomicrons and triglyceride figures >1000 mg/dL can cause acute pancreatitis, a potentially fatal complication. The option of rapid reduction in triglyceride concentrations is attractive and possible with plasmapheresis. METHODS: We present the results of an analysis of 11 patients admitted to the intensive care unit with severe hypertriglyceridemic pancreatitis and treated with plasmapheresis. The procedure was repeated until serum triglycerides were below 1000 mg/dL. We recorded anthropometric, clinical data as well as final outcome. RESULTS: In eight patients a single plasma exchange was sufficient to reduce triglyceride figures <1000 mg/dL. Only three patients died, all with the worst severity indexes and who experienced the longest delay before the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Our results, together with a review of the literature, confirm the need for a randomized clinical trial to compare conventional treatment vs. plasmapheresis in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemic pancreatitis.

Cor pulmonale hipertensión pulmonar secundaria a síndrome crest. Tratamiento con ultrafiltración lenta continua / Cor pulmonale-PHT secondary to crest syndrome. Treatment with slow continuous ultrafiltration

La hipertensión pulmonar es una patología grave con un tratamiento complejo basado en medidas generales, anticoagulación y utilización de fármacos específicos vasodilatadores. La insuficiencia cardiaca derecha instaurada en estadios finales de la enfermedad se trata con diuréticos. Presentamos la ultrafiltración lenta continua como tratamiento en insuficiencia cardiaca derecha secundaria a hipertensión pulmonar asociada a enfermedad del colágeno refractaria a tratamiento diurético (AU)

Pulmonary hypertension is a severe disease with complex treatment based on general measurements, anticoagulation and use of specific vasodilator drugs. Right heart failure initiated in final stages of the disease is treated with diuretics. We present the case of slow continuous ultrafilitration as treatment in right heart failure secondary to pulmonary hypertension associated to collagen disease refractory to diuretic treatment (AU)

[Cor pulmonale-PHT secondary to crest syndrome. Treatment with slow continuous ultrafiltration]. / Cor pulmonale hipertensión pulmonar secundaria a síndrome crest. Tratamiento con ultrafiltración lenta continua.

Pulmonary hypertension is a severe disease with complex treatment based on general measurements, anticoagulation and use of specific vasodilator drugs. Right heart failure initiated in final stages of the disease is treated with diuretics. We present the case of slow continuous ultrafilitration as treatment in right heart failure secondary to pulmonary hypertension associated to collagen disease refractory to diuretic treatment.

Utilidad de la plasmaféresis en cuidados intensivos / Utility of plasmapheresis in intensive care

Presentamos las plasmaféresis (PMF) realizadas en una unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI) polivalente de 18 camas en el quinquenio comprendido entre los años 2003-2007. El objetivo del presente artículo es comunicar nuestra experiencia en PMF realizada con monitores específicos para tratamientos continuos de reemplazo renal (TCRR) y evidenciar la versatilidad derivada del uso de estos tratamientos y de estos monitores en las UCI. La utilidad de estos procedimientos abarcan muchos escenarios de la enfermedad crítica ingresada en nuestras unidades (pacientes neurológicos, hematológicos, reumatológicos). En definitiva, nuestra experiencia en PMF nos lleva a concluir que es un tratamiento de depuración extracorpórea sencillo, que puede realizar el personal sanitario de cuidados intensivos en cualquier momento dentro de un amplio espectro de indicaciones clínicas, con monitores de TCRR y con unas complicaciones asociadas a la técnica mínimas y leves (AU)

We discuss the plasmapheresis (PE) carried out in an 18-bed polyvalent intensive care unit between the years 2003-2007. This article aims to report our experience in plasmapheresis performed with specific monitors for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) that shows the versatility of the use of these procedures in intensive care. The utility of these procedures include many different critical disease settings in our units (neurology, hematology, and rheumatology patients). In short, our experience in PE has led us to the conclusion that plasmapheresis is a simple extracorporeal depuration treatment that can be performed by staff trained in intensive care at any moment within a wide spectrum of clinical indications, with CRRT monitors and with minimum adverse effects (AU)

[Utility of plasmapheresis in intensive care]. / Utilidad de la plasmaféresis en cuidados intensivos.

We discuss the plasmapheresis (PE) carried out in an 18-bed polyvalent intensive care unit between the years 2003-2007. This article aims to report our experience in plasmapheresis performed with specific monitors for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) that shows the versatility of the use of these procedures in intensive care. The utility of these procedures include many different critical disease settings in our units (neurology, hematology, and rheumatology patients). In short, our experience in PE has led us to the conclusion that plasmapheresis is a simple extracorporeal depuration treatment that can be performed by staff trained in intensive care at any moment within a wide spectrum of clinical indications, with CRRT monitors and with minimum adverse effects.