The importance of both workplace and private life factors in psychological distress: a large cross-sectional survey of French railway company employees.

PURPOSE: The psychological well-being of employees is a priority in occupational health. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of psychological distress among employees of a large French company, to calculate the associations between distress and stressors in the workplace and private life domains, and to explore confounding across stressor domains. METHODS: 8,058 employees of the French national railways company completed a nation-wide survey in 2006 (94.3 % participation). Psychological distress was measured by the 12-item General Health Questionnaire and 21 potential stressors and socio-demographic factors by a self-administered questionnaire. Stressors were summarized in scores for work pressure, workplace conflict, and personal life domains. Risk ratios (RRs) between psychological distress and stressors were calculated using robust-variance Poisson regression. RESULTS: The prevalence of psychological distress was 32.8 % (95 % CI 31.8-33.9 %), higher among women (48.9 %, 95 % CI 46.5-51.7 %) than men (30.1 %, 95 % CI 29.0-31.2 %). Each stressor domain was associated with distress in the final model containing likely confounders and all three domains (RR highest vs. lowest level-work pressure: men 1.55, 95 % CI 1.42-1.70, women 1.42, 95 % CI 1.23-1.63; work conflict: men 2.63, 95 % CI 2.38-2.91, women 1.98, 95 % CI 1.70-2.30; life concerns: men 2.04, 95 % CI 1.86-2.23, women 1.53, 95 % CI 1.32-1.78). The mutually adjusted RRs for the stressor domains were smaller than the unadjusted RRs. CONCLUSIONS: Almost one-third of all employees and one-half of female employees experienced psychological distress. All three stressor domains were associated with psychological distress and adjustment reduced the association size, suggesting possible over-estimation if one or more domains are omitted from the survey.

A prospective study of the psychological effects of "person under train" incidents on drivers.

Previous studies have shown that person under train (PUT) accidents cause psychological distress to drivers during the first year following the incident. Our aims were to assess the psychological consequences of PUT accidents on drivers prospectively, and to identify risk factors for psychological effects. In this prospective, one-year, follow-up study, a consecutive series of PUT drivers (n=202) were compared with a group of matched control drivers (n=186). Psychological state was assessed 15 days, 3 months and 1 year after the event, using the GHQ-28 questionnaire and a standardised diagnostic interview (the v4.4 MINI). Fifteen days after the event, PUT drivers had significantly higher GHQ-28 scores (p<0.0001) and more acute stress disorder (p=0.008) than control drivers. No significant differences were found 3 months and 1 year after the accident. Significant explicative variables were the presence of acute and chronic psychosocial stressors (OR=3.30 and 3.68) and the availability of immediate help (OR=0.46). We thus confirm previous findings that train drivers who have experienced a PUT accident experience acute psychological disturbances. Our results also highlight the utility of the systematic prevention programme provided.