Impact of restrictive fluid balance focused to increase lung procurement on renal function after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Restrictive management of fluid status has been proposed to increase the rates of lung grafts available for transplant. However, no studies have supported the effect of this negative fluid balance in the kidney graft recipients. METHODS: We evaluated the effect of restrictive fluid balance in brain-dead donors and their impact in 404 kidney recipients using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression for long-term effects, and logistic regression for short-term effects. Our primary interest was graft survival and the second was occurrence of delayed graft function (DGF). RESULTS: A negative or equalized fluid balance with a central venous pressure (CVP) <6 mm Hg affects neither graft survival in kidney recipients (P = 0.983) nor the development of DGF (P = 0.573). A positive fluid balance between brain death and organ retrieval does not reduce either the risk of graft survival or the risk of DGF. CONCLUSION: We concluded that restrictive management of fluid balance in a multiorgan donor supports adequate perfusion to vital organ systems even with a CVP <6 mm Hg. A strict fluid balance could avoid volume overload and lung neurogenic oedema, increasing the rate of lung grafts available for transplant without impacting either kidney graft survival or DGF development.

[Dialysis and transplant. Spain in 2005]. / Informe de Situación de Diálisis y Trasplante en España, 2005.

In 2005, renal replace treatment (dialysis and transplant) was necessary for about 40,000 people, without being known the number accurate and either their basic characteristics, such as: time in treatment, modality or treatment changes. The presented data cover the 76% of the Spanish population and are the result of the cooperation among technicians of registries, nephrologists and transplant coordinations. 4,125 people started RRT in 2005, the total estimated acceptance rate for renal replacement therapy in adults in Spain was 126 pmp and regarding other European countries it locates us in an intermediate area. The incidence rate seems to keep stable in the last years although there were some differences among communities (from 104 pmp in Castile and Leon to 186 pmp in Canary Islands). Diabetes Mellitus is the most diagnosed cause of renal failure in 2005, more than 20% of patients, followed by vascular diseases. The estimated prevalence of renal replacement therapy in Spain at the end of 2005 was 903 pmp, with important variations among communities (from 806 pmp in Cantabria to 1056 pmp in Valencia Region). The 47% of prevalent RRT patients had a functioning transplant. Mortality on haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis was 13.7% and 10.8% respectively. Mortality on transplant was 1.3%, one of the lowest values registered so far. Mortality on renal replacement therapy was around 5% among patients from 45 to 64 years, 11% between 65 and 74 years and 19% among the patients older than 75 years.

Prediabetes in patients receiving tacrolimus in the first year after kidney transplantation: a prospective and multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, the most widely used regimen in kidney transplantation, increases the risk of new onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT). However, the prevalence, evolution and risk factors of different prediabetic alterations: impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, and provisional diabetes, have not been established. METHODS: In this multicenter and prospective study we evaluated 154 nondiabetic kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and low dose steroids. An oral glucose tolerance test was performed 3 and 12 months after transplantation and prediabetes was defined by American Diabetes Association criteria. RESULTS: Prediabetes was highly prevalent and showed little variation between 3 and 12 months (36% and 33%, respectively). Impaired glucose tolerance was the most frequent abnormality observed (23% and 25%, respectively) observed. In addition, 20% of recipients showed NODAT by 1 year. Multivariate analysis showed that age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.004-1.14), pretransplant body mass index (OR: 1.3, CI: 1.09-1.6) and triglyceride/high density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio, a marker of insulin resistance, (OR: 1.4, CI: 1.05-1.9) were independent risk factors for prediabetes. CONCLUSION: One in two recipients with tacrolimus-based immunosuppresion showed prediabetes or NODAT by 1 year posttransplantation when properly investigated. Older age and high pretransplant body mass index and triglyceride/high density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio were risk factors for prediabetes. These findings may help applying early interventions to prevent the disorder.

New-onset diabetes after kidney transplantation: risk factors.

New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) contributes to the risk for cardiovascular disease and infection, reducing graft and patient survival. For improvement of the outcome of kidney transplant recipients, it is of great interest to know precisely the risk factors that contribute to NODAT development. Nonmodifiable risk factors for development of NODAT are age, race, genetic background, family history of diabetes, and previous glucose intolerance. Modifiable risk factors are obesity and overweight, hepatitis C virus and cytomegalovirus infections, and immunosuppressive drugs. Both steroids and calcineurin inhibitors influence the appearance of NODAT, whereas the role of sirolimus in glucose metabolism currently is controversial.

Non-immunologic intervention in chronic allograft nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Chronic allograft nephropathy is the main cause of late graft loss. It has been suggested that both alloantigen-dependent and alloantigen-independent factors influence the development of progressive transplant failure. The present study analyzed the importance of non-immunologic factors in the progression of kidney disease in transplant patients, with the emphasis on well-established risk factors for progression in native kidneys. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 485 renal transplant patients who had functioning kidneys for at least 1 year. We investigated whether the initial presence and subsequent maintenance of proteinuria, hypertension, anemia, hyperlipidemia, and hyperparathyroidism influenced the progression of transplant failure. To analyze the relative effects of these factors, patients were categorized into two groups: group A had a baseline serum creatinine concentration of less than 1.5 mg/dL, and group B had a baseline serum creatinine concentration of 1.5 to 3 mg/dL. RESULTS: High urine protein excretion was a significant independent risk factor for progression of renal failure (group A: relative risk, 3.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.24-6.21; group B: relative risk, 4.01; 95% CI, 2.51-6.39). Hypertension was also a significant independent risk factor for progression, but the risk was lower than for proteinuria (group A: relative risk, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.04-1.75; group B: relative risk, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.02-2.1). Anemia, hyperlipidemia, and hyperparathyroidism had no influence on the progression of renal failure. CONCLUSION: Our results show strong independent relationships between high blood pressure, urine protein excretion, and the relative risk of chronic progression of renal failure, as described for native kidney disease. These factors are potentially modifiable and are therefore attractive targets for therapeutic targets.

Evolution of tacrolimus blood levels and concentration-dose ratios in patients who develop new onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation.

New onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) affects kidney transplantation outcome. Several risk factors, including immunosuppressive drug levels, are related with NODM development. This analysis evaluates the incidence and risk factors of NODM in kidney transplant patients receiving tacrolimus, taking into account 6-month blood levels and concentration-dose ratios (CDRs). Seventy-six patients under tacrolimus therapy who received a cadaveric renal transplant in our centre and with graft survival higher than 1 year were included in the study. NODM was defined as two fasting plasma glucose values > or =126 mg/dl or symptoms of diabetes plus casual plasma glucose concentrations > or =200 mg/dl throughout the first year. We examined previously reported variables related with NODM development. The incidence of NODM at 12 months was 27.6%. Risk factors for NODM included older age, higher first tacrolimus level, higher body mass index and lower first year weight gain. In multivariate analysis, the first year occurrence of NODM was significantly determined by the first tacrolimus blood level >20 ng/ml and age older than 50 years. CDR remains significantly higher in NODM throughout the 6 months. Older age and a high first tacrolimus blood level are associated with the development of NODM during the first year after kidney transplantation. NODM patients show higher CDR during the first 6 months.

Association between pulse pressure and cardiovascular disease in renal transplant patients.

Elevated pulse pressure in general population has been shown to be associated with cardiovascular disease, which is the main cause of death in renal transplant patients. We investigated the effect that a wider pulse pressure range may have on cardiovascular disease after renal transplantation in 532 transplant patients with functioning graft for more than 1 year. Patients were classified into two groups depending on 1-year pulse pressure (< or >/=65 mmHg) and we analyzed patient and graft survival, post-transplant cardiovascular disease and main causes of death. Higher pulse pressure was associated with older recipient age (40.8 +/- 10.8 vs. 50 +/- 11.3), higher systolic blood pressure (132.7 +/- 16.1 vs. 164.5 +/- 16), lower blood diastolic pressure (84.5 +/- 11.6 vs. 84.4 +/- 11.2), higher prevalence of diabetes (12% vs. 23%) and total cardiovascular disease (20.9% vs. 33.6%). Five- and 10-year patient survivals were lower in the group with higher pulse pressure, being vascular disease the main cause of death in both groups. In a Cox regression model increased pulse pressure was associated with higher cardiovascular disease (RR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.13-2.32 p < 0.01). In conclusion, pulse pressure was an independent risk factor for increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in renal transplant patients.

Creatinine reduction ratio on post-transplant day two as criterion in defining delayed graft function.

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication after renal transplant, affecting its outcome. A common definition of DGF is the need for dialysis within the first week of transplantation, but this criterion has its drawbacks. We tried to validate an earlier and better defined parameter of DGF based on the creatinine reduction ratio on post-transplant day 2 (CRR2). We analyzed the clinical charts of 291 cadaver kidney recipients to compare the outcome of patients with immediate graft function (IGF), dialyzed patients (D-DGF) and nondialyzed CRR2-defined DGF patients (ND-DGF) and to identify risk factors for D-DGF and ND-DGF. Creatinine reduction ratio on post-transplant day 2 correlates significantly with renal function during the first year. Patients with IGF have significantly better renal function throughout the first year and better graft survival than patients with D-DGF and ND-DGF, while we found no differences either in renal function from days 30-365 or in graft survival between D-DGF and ND-DGF patients. Defining DGF by CRR2 allows an objective and quantitative diagnosis after transplantation and can help to improve post-transplant management. Creatinine reduction ratio on post-transplant day 2 correlates with renal function throughout the first year. The worse survival in the ND-DGF group is an important finding and a major advantage of the CRR2 criterion.

Relationship of donor-specific class-I anti-HLA antibodies detected by ELISA after kidney transplantation on the development of acute rejection and graft survival.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of post-transplant donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DS-HLA Abs) detected by an ELISA method on long-term graft survival. METHODS: The serum pre-/post-transplant profile of anti-HLA Abs was analysed in 71 renal transplant patients by ELISA. The HLA specificity of positive sera was analysed by a different ELISA method. According to the results, patients were classified into two different groups: those who either developed DS-HLA Abs or significantly increased their panel-reactive antibody (PRA) (group A) and those who did not (group B). RESULTS: Thirteen out of 71 patients showed post-transplant DS-HLA Abs and were included in group A, whereas the remaining 58 were placed in group B. The incidence of acute rejection (AR) was significantly higher in group A than in group B (77 vs 10%). In addition, seven out of eight patients from group A had graft loss secondary to AR, whereas one of nine grafts lost in group B was due to AR. When analysing the clinical outcome according to HLA class specificity, only patients with HLA-I Abs lost their grafts due to vascular AR. The remaining patients with HLA-II Abs who lost their grafts also had HLA-I Abs. In four of the eight patients who lost their grafts, DS HLA-I Abs were detected several days before AR. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of DS HLA-I Abs in the post-transplant period may provide a good marker for AR and graft loss due to immunological origin. Monitorization of these Abs by ELISA may be a useful tool for tailoring immunosuppression after kidney transplantation.

Ecstasy-induced brain death and acute hepatocellular failure: multiorgan donor and liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Ecstasy is a neurotoxic and hepatotoxic drug. Brain edema and fulminant hepatic failure are two of the most serious complications associated with the consumption of ecstasy. Acute ecstasy intoxication can transform a patient into an organ donor or a hepatic graft recipient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the last 5 years in our centers, we have had two multiorgan donors who died from ecstasy-induced brain edema and three patients who required urgent orthotopic liver transplantation for treatment of severe acute hepatocellular failure induced by this drug. We performed eight transplantations using the organs of these two brain-dead donors: one heart, one bipulmonary, three kidneys, one kidney-pancreas, and two livers. RESULTS: Toxicity caused by ecstasy was not observed in any of the eight patients who underwent transplantation. The clinical state and the graft function of the heart, two liver, renopancreatic, and three kidney recipients were normal for a follow-up period that ranged between 7 months and 4.5 years. The lung recipient died from multiorgan failure secondary to bilateral pneumonia 5 days after the transplantation, and one of the kidney transplant patients died as a result of intestinal lymphoma 6 months after transplantation. The three liver transplantations in the three patients with ecstasy-induced fulminant hepatic failure were performed successfully using orthotopic transplantation. These three recipients are asymptomatic and have normal-functioning hepatic grafts after follow-up of 3.5 years, 15 months, and 11 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The thoracic and abdominal organs of people dying from ecstasy intoxication can be viable for transplantation. The short- and medium-term survival of the graft and of the recipient have been similar to that of other organ donors. Urgent liver transplantation is an effective therapeutic option in patients with ecstasy-induced acute hepatocellular failure.

Apolipoprotein C-III and E polymorphisms and cardiovascular syndrome, hyperlipidemia, and insulin resistance in renal transplantation.

Hyperlipidemia and insulin resistance frequently develop after renal transplantation, contributing to cardiovascular disease. Individual differences in response based upon genetic variations in proteins regulating lipidic and glucose tolerance metabolism could be expected. In the general population, the S2 allelic variant of the apoprotein (apo) C-III gene has been associated with hypertriglyceridemia and an insulin resistant state, whereas the E4 allele of the apo E has been associated with hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis. Its influence in renal transplant patients remains to be seen. In order to assess the impact of apo E and C-III major polymorphisms on atherosclerotic vascular disease, lipid profile and impaired glucose tolerance in renal transplant patients, we studied 110 consecutively examined patients undergoing kidney transplantation (age range 24-73 years). Atherosclerotic complications were detected in 25% of patients, with age, male sex and hypercholesterolemia being significant atherosclerotic risk factors. Among the male patients with E4 allele, the odds ratio for coronary disease and global atherosclerosis were 10.2 (95% CI) and 6.4 (95% CI), respectively. There were no significant differences in the frequency of any of the polymorphisms among patients with dyslipidemia and impaired glucose tolerance. As the number of patients in our sample was small, larger studies are needed to verify these issues. While in the studied population C-III polymorphism appears to have little association with the prevalence of atherosclerotic complications, E4 allele should be considered as a genetic marker of coronary artery disease and global atherosclerosis in renal transplant patients.

Acute rejection in the elderly recipient: influence of age in the outcome of kidney transplantation.

Since the immune response in older recipients is weaker they should be less likely to reject a transplanted organ and should need less aggressive immunosuppressive treatment. Our aim was to record the incidence and severity of episodes of acute rejection (AR), estimate the influence of these events on graft survival of elderly recipients (> or = 60) and to compare these with that in younger ones. We performed 363 kidney transplants between 1/94 and 12/98, and recorded clinical and immunological data, incidence-severity of AR and cause of graft loss. Patients were divided into two groups, according to the age at transplantation: A (<60, n = 281/77.4%) and B (> 60, n = 82/22.6%). The percentage of aging recipients and mean age of donors and recipients increased throughout the period. Although the incidence of ATN was higher in the older group (29% vs.19%, p < 0.0001) the number of graft biopsies was equal in both groups. The incidence of AR was similar, 33.4% vs. 26.8%, pNS. The number of AR episodes per patient was 0.44 and 0.41 respectively. The severity of AR was: Banff grade I: A (40.3%)/B (45.7%) pNS; grade II: A (44.1%)/B (48.57) pNS; grade III: A (15.5%)/B (5.7%) pNS. Younger recipients presented a higher level of panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) (4.3% vs. 2.07%, p = 0.01). One-yearpatient survival was 96%/91% (p < 0.05) and graft survival was 81%/78% (pNS) respectively. The age of recipient does not seem to have influenced the incidence-severity of AR or the graft survival. Thus immunosuppression should be individualized for each patient and should not depend on the age at transplantation.

Significance of age in the survival of diabetic patients after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In recent years acceptance of diabetic patients for renal replacement therapy has increased. Renal transplantation for Type I diabetic patients is widely accepted but the appropriate treatment for Type II diabetic patients is still a matter of dispute. Our study was done to determine whether the age of Type II diabetic patients constituted an additional risk factor. METHODS: We analyzed the outcome of renal transplantation in 56 diabetic patients, 31 Type I and 25 Type II diabetics (we excluded any who had combined kidney-pancreas transplants). We compared them with 51 non-diabetic patients who were transplanted because of end-stage renal failure due to nephrosclerosis and age-matched to type II diabetic patients. We assessed the one- and three-year patient and graft survival, the quality of renal function, the main complications and causes of mortality. RESULTS: The overall one- and three-year patient survival was 69% and 60% in Type II patients; 73% and 69% in Type I diabetes patients and 88% and 80% in patients with nephrosclerosis. The overall one- and three-year actuarial graft survival was 50% and 38% in patients with Type II disease and 58% and 50% in Type I diabetes, and 76% and 64% in nephrosclerosis. The main cause of graft loss in all groups was death (with functioning kidney) due to infections and cardiovascular complications. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes itself is the most important variable in patients who have poor results after kidney transplantation. Increasing age increases slightly the risk for poor graft and patient survival. Both groups of diabetic patients have poorer results than controls but in this comparison age was an independent factor.

The risk of cardiovascular disease associated with proteinuria in renal transplant patients.

Proteinuria in the general population has been shown to be associated with cardiovascular disease, which is the main cause of death in renal transplantation. We investigated the effect of proteinuria on cardiovascular disease after renal transplantation in 532 renal transplant patients with functioning grafts for more than 1 year. Patients were classified into two groups depending on the presence of persistent proteinuria. We analyzed graft and patient survival, posttransplantation cardiovascular disease, and main causes of graft loss and death. Five- and 10-year graft and patient survival rates were lower in the group with proteinuria. The main cause of death was vascular disease in both groups. The presence of posttransplantation cardiovascular disease was higher in the group with proteinuria. Persistent proteinuria was associated with graft loss (RR=4.18), patient death (RR=1.92), and cardiovascular disease (RR=2.45). In conclusion, persistent proteinuria was an independent risk factor for increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in renal transplant patients.

Return to dialysis after renal transplantation. Which would be the best way?

The exact moment to return to dialysis when a graft fails has not clearly been established. Furthermore, there is no agreement with respect to whether the guidelines accepted for patients entering dialysis for the first time are adequate for this subgroup of patients with advanced renal failure, due to the special characteristics of these patients, derived from the immunosuppressive medications they are taking among other accompanying factors. We reviewed a group of renal transplant patients who returned to dialysis and compared them with a group of patients entering dialysis for the first time. Patients with chronic renal failure due to graft failure had a poorer renal function at the time entering dialysis and a more profound anemia. Additionally, complications considered such as the number of hospital admissions during the first year after initiation of dialysis were considerably higher in the group of transplanted patients. We advocate for an earlier referral to the dialysis unit, a more aggressive erythropoietin therapy in the phase of advanced renal failure due to chronic allograft nephropathy, and in selected cases retransplantation before definitive graft loss.