How to safely collect and deliver blood components for transfusion.

RATIONALE AND KEY POINTS: There are several steps in the transfusion process that aim to ensure the correct blood component is given to the correct patient at the correct time. Ensuring the correct blood component is collected for the correct patient is crucial to safe transfusion practice and patient safety. This article explains the blood component collection and delivery procedure in the UK and outlines the steps that are necessary to enable nurses to collect blood components safely. Nurses in other countries can access their local guidelines and protocols and review these against the guidelines outlined in this article. REFLECTIVE ACTIVITY: How to articles can help to update your practice and ensure it remains evidence based. Apply this article to your practice. Reflect on and write a short account of.

Interventions to reduce wrong blood in tube errors in transfusion: a systematic review.

This systematic review addresses the issue of wrong blood in tube (WBIT). The objective was to identify interventions that have been implemented and the effectiveness of these interventions to reduce WBIT incidence in red blood cell transfusion. Eligible articles were identified through a comprehensive search of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cinahl, BNID, and the Transfusion Evidence Library to April 2013. Initial search criteria were wide including primary intervention or observational studies, case reports, expert opinion, and guidelines. There was no restriction by study type, language, or status. Publications before 1995, reviews or reports of a secondary nature, studies of sampling errors outwith transfusion, and articles involving animals were excluded. The primary outcome was a reduction in errors. Study characteristics, outcomes measured, and methodological quality were extracted by 2 authors independently. The principal method of analysis was descriptive. A total of 12,703 references were initially identified. Preliminary secondary screening by 2 reviewers reduced articles for detailed screening to 128 articles. Eleven articles were eventually identified as eligible, resulting in 9 independent studies being included in the review. The overall finding was that all the identified interventions reduced WBIT incidence. Five studies measured the effect of a single intervention, for example, changes to blood sample labeling, weekly feedback, handwritten transfusion requests, and an electronic transfusion system. Four studies reported multiple interventions including education, second check of ID at sampling, and confirmatory sampling. It was not clear which intervention was the most effective. Sustainability of the effectiveness of interventions was also unclear. Targeted interventions, either single or multiple, can lead to a reduction in WBIT; but the sustainability of effectiveness is uncertain. Data on the pre- and postimplementation of interventions need to be collected in future trials to demonstrate effectiveness, and comparative studies are needed of different interventions.

National audit of bedside transfusion practice.

AIM: To measure clinical bedside practice and promote best practice for the administration of blood. METHOD: Data were collected on patient identification and the monitoring of patients receiving a transfusion. RESULTS: The majority of patients received safe transfusion, with adequate identity checks and careful monitoring. Some patients, however, were at risk of misidentification or an unobserved transfusion reaction because of the absence of a patient identity wristband or lack of monitoring during transfusion. CONCLUSION: The results of the audit are largely positive, with a continual comparative trend from previous audits of improvement in patient safety during transfusion. Healthcare professionals appear to recognise the importance of the final bedside check and monitoring of transfused patients, contributing to safe practice. However, a minority of patients were put at risk because procedures were not followed. The findings of this audit, particularly those relating to patient identification and monitoring, are relevant to many other aspects of clinical care, not only safe transfusion practice.

Exploring the opinions of registered nurses working in a clinical transfusion environment on the contribution of e-learning to personal learning and clinical practice: results of a small scale educational research study.

AIM: To explore the opinions of registered nurses on the Learnbloodtransfusion Module 1: Safe Transfusion Practice e-learning programme to meeting personal learning styles and learning needs. METHOD: A qualitative research methodology was applied based on the principles of phenomenology. Adopting a convenience sampling plan supported the recruitment of participants who had successfully completed the e-learning course. ANALYSIS: Thematic analysis from the semi-structured interviews identified common emerging themes through application of Colaizzis framework. RESULTS: Seven participants of total sample population (89) volunteered to participate in the study. Five themes emerged which included learning preferences, interactive learning, course design, patient safety and future learning needs. Findings positively show the e-learning programme captures the learning styles and needs of learners. In particular, learning styles of a reflector, theorist and activist as well as a visual learner can actively engage in the online learning experience. In an attempt to bridge the knowledge practice gap, further opinions are offered on the course design and the application of knowledge to practice following completion of the course. CONCLUSION: The findings of the small scale research study have shown that the e-learning course does meet the diverse learning styles and needs of nurses working in a clinical transfusion environment. However, technology alone is not sufficient and a blended approach to learning must be adopted to meet bridging the theory practice gap supporting the integration of knowledge to clinical practice.

A randomized phase 2 study of paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without conatumumab for first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of conatumumab combined with paclitaxel-carboplatin (PC) as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients (aged >18 years) with previously untreated advanced or recurrent NSCLC were randomized 1:1:1 (stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and disease stage) to receive up to six 3-week cycles of PC combined with conatumumab (arm 1, 3 mg/kg; arm 2, 15 mg/kg) or placebo (arm 3) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00534027). RESULTS: Between August 8, 2007 and April 9, 2009, 172 patients were randomized (arm 1, n = 57; arm 2, n = 56; arm 3, n = 59). Median PFS was 5.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1-6.3) in arm 1 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.84 [95% CI 0.57-1.24]; p = 0.41), 4.8 months (95% CI 3.2-6.5) in arm 2 (HR 0.93 [0.64-1.35]; p = 0.57), and 5.5 months (95% CI 4.3-5.7) in arm 3. There was an interaction between tumor histology and the effect of conatumumab on PFS (squamous HR 0.47 [0.23-0.94]; nonsquamous HR 1.08 [0.74-1.57]; interaction p = 0.039).The most common grade of three or more adverse events were neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. There was no evidence of pharmacokinetic interactions between conatumumab and PC. Of 158 patients assessable for FCGR3A polymorphisms, conatumumab treatment was associated with a trend toward longer overall survival (HR 0.72 [0.43-1.23]) among V-allele carriers (V/V or F/V; n = 54) but not among F-allele homozygotes (n = 34; HR 1.37 [0.66-2.86]). CONCLUSION: Although well tolerated, the addition of conatumumab to PC did not improve outcomes in unselected patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC.

DNA methylation of the PITX2 gene promoter region is a strong independent prognostic marker of biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Approximately 35% of patients with prostate cancer who undergo radical prostatectomy experience prostate specific antigen recurrence within 10 years of surgery. Current prognostic indicators cannot sufficiently detect who is at risk for biochemical recurrence. We evaluated DNA methylation markers for prostate cancer prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed the DNA methylation of 6 marker candidates that were identified in previous studies. Formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissue sections from a cohort of 605 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction assays. Using a Cox proportional hazard model we determined which markers were significant predictors of biochemical recurrence. RESULTS: ABHD9, Chr3-EST, GPR7, HIST2H2BF and PITX2 were significantly associated with biochemical recurrence. PITX2 methylation was the strongest predictor of biochemical recurrence, providing additional prognostic information to established clinical factors in patients treated with radical prostatectomy and especially in patients at intermediate risk (Gleason 7). Patients with greater than median PITX2 methylation in the tumors were 4 times more likely to experience biochemical recurrence within 8 years after surgery than patients with less than average methylation. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic information provided by PITX2 methylation adds significantly to currently used clinical variables such as Gleason grade and stage. Therefore, it could contribute to better counseling in patients with prostate cancer.

Discovery and validation of 3 novel DNA methylation markers of prostate cancer prognosis.

PURPOSE: About 15% of men experience prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy. A DNA methylation based molecular test could provide important information to predict which patients are most likely to experience recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a genome-wide scan to find aberrantly methylated loci in prostate cancer from patients with early recurrence, high Gleason score or advanced stage. We discovered 441 candidate methylation markers and further analyzed 62 candidates in a methylation microarray study of 304 frozen prostatectomy samples. RESULTS: Methylation of 25 markers was significantly changed in high Gleason score (8-10) vs low Gleason score (2-6) cancers. Methylation levels of the 3 marker candidates GPR7, ABHD9 and an expressed sequence tag on chromosome 3 (Chr3-EST) were significantly increased in patients who did vs did not experience early PSA recurrence (Bonferroni correction p<0.05). Furthermore, these markers were also informative when the sample set was restricted to 68 mid range Gleason score (6 or 7) samples only. We developed real-time polymerase chain reaction assays for ABHD9 and Chr3-EST, and measured methylation in paraffin embedded, formalin fixed prostatectomy samples from an independent set of 223 patients. Methylation of the 2 markers was significantly higher in patients with early PSA recurrence compared to that in patients who did not experience PSA recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: We report that methylation of the 3 novel markers GPR7, ABHD9 and Chr3-EST is significantly associated with prostate cancer prognosis. Incorporation of these methylation markers into clinical practice will result in more accurate prediction of which patients are likely to experience PSA recurrence.

Molecular diagnostic applications of DNA methylation technology.

Cancer arises due to the accumulation of DNA modifications that give cells a selective growth advantage. One common DNA modification is promoter hypermethylation associated with loss of expression of a tumor suppressor gene. The methylation status of a specific sequence or the pattern of methylation across the genome can be readily measured, and these sequences and analytical methods are being rapidly developed for molecular diagnostic applications. Detection of certain methylation events can be used for early detection of tumors, and analysis of patterns of methylation across the genome might provide information on disease subtype, aggressiveness, and treatment response. DNA methylation-based molecular diagnostic assays are particularly attractive because of the stability of the target analyte (DNA) and the potential sensitivity of the assays. As the field matures, methylation-based assays will make a major contribution to the field of molecular diagnostics, providing tools to fill unmet needs in current diagnostic and treatment plans for many types of cancer.

A real-time PCR assay for DNA-methylation using methylation-specific blockers.

DNA methylation-based biomarkers have been discovered that could potentially be used for the diagnosis of cancer by detection of circulating, tumor-derived DNA in bodily fluids. Any methylation detection assay that would be applied to these samples must be capable of detecting small amounts of tumor DNA in the presence of background normal DNA. We have developed a real-time PCR assay, called HeavyMethyl, that is well suited for this application. HeavyMethyl uses methylation-specific oligonucleotide blockers and a methylation-specific probe to achieve methylation-specific amplification and detection. We tested the assays on unmethylated and artificially methylated DNA in order to determine the limit of detection. After careful optimization, our glutathione-S-transferase pi1 and Calcitonin assays can amplify as little as 30 and 60 pg of methylated DNA, respectively, and neither assay amplifies unmethylated DNA. The Calcitonin assay showed a highly significant methylation difference between normal colon and colon adenocarcinomas, and methylation was also detected in serum DNA from colon cancer patients. These assays show that HeavyMethyl technology can be successfully employed for the analysis of very low concentrations of methylated DNA, e.g. in serum of patients with tumors.

Sensitive detection of DNA methylation.

In recent years, many molecular biomarkers have been discovered that are capable of distinguishing tumors from normal tissue. Among the different types of markers, DNA methylation markers stand out for their potential to provide a unique combination of specificity, sensitivity, high information content, and applicability to a wide variety of clinical specimens. Methylation markers are particularly suited for situations where sensitive detection is necessary, such as when tumor DNA is either scarce or diluted by excess normal DNA. One of the most widely used methods for measuring methylation levels, methylation-specific PCR (MSP), has been proved to be a very effective tool in situations requiring sensitive detection. The addition of fluorogenic probes makes these assays more informative, quantitative, and suitable for a clinical format. The field of sensitive detection is not limited to MSP; hence, an alternative methylation-sensitive amplification is discussed. PCR-based methylation assays have been applied to the detection of tumor DNA in a variety of body fluids, including serum, plasma, urine, sputum, and lavage fluids. In many cases, the sensitivity and specificity of these detection assays has been impressive, but important technological issues remain in areas such as sample preparation, assay design, and marker selection. Once these technical concerns have been addressed, the sensitive detection of methylation will provide a powerful diagnostic and prognostic tool, especially for the early detection of preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions.