Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Cephalalgia ; 31(7): 837-50, 2011 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21464078

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evidence for quality of life (QoL) impairment, disability, healthcare resource use and economic burden associated with chronic daily headache (CDH), focusing on chronic migraine (CM) with or without medication overuse. METHODS: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of studies of patients/subjects with CDH that included CM, occurring on at least 15 days per month. MAIN FINDINGS: Thirty-four studies were included for review (25 studies of patients and nine of subjects from the general population). CDH and CDH with medication overuse headache (MOH) were consistently associated with a lower QoL compared to control or episodic headache (EH) and CDH without MOH. CDH was consistently associated with greater disability and productivity loss, more consultations, more or longer hospitalizations and higher direct costs than EH. Data were not amenable to statistical pooling. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review underline the detriment to QoL and the disabling nature of CDH, and in particular CM and CDH with MOH, and negative impact on workplace productivity compared to other types of headache.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Transtornos da Cefaleia/economia , Transtornos da Cefaleia/psicologia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/economia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Analgésicos/efeitos adversos , Doença Crônica , Humanos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/etiologia
2.
Value Health ; 11(3): 376-88, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18489664

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of atomoxetine for children with attention-deficity/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the United Kingdom compared with current alternatives. METHODS: An economic model with Markov processes was developed to estimate the costs and benefits of atomoxetine versus other current ADHD treatment options. The model evaluated atomoxetine in five patient subgroups according to treatment history and the existence of comorbidities precluding stimulant medication. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was calculated for atomoxetine treatment algorithms compared with comparator algorithms. The Markov process incorporated 18 health states, representing a range of outcomes across all treatment options included in the algorithms. Utility values were derived from a survey of 83 parents of children with ADHD. The effectiveness and safety aspects of the treatment options were based on a thorough review of controlled clinical trials and other clinical literature, and validated by international experts. Costs and outcomes were estimated using Monte Carlo simulation over a 1-year duration, with costs estimated from the perspective of the National Health Service in England and Wales. RESULTS: For stimulant-naive patients, the incremental cost per QALY gained for the atomoxetine algorithm compared with immediate-release methylphenidate hydrochloride (MPH) was pound 15,224 ( pound 13,241 compared with extended-release MPH). In the stimulant-exposed populations, the incremental cost per QALY for the atomoxetine algorithm was between pound 14,169 and pound 15,878. For patients contraindicated for stimulant therapies, the incremental cost per QALY was pound 11,523 and pound 12,370 for stimulant-naive and stimulant-exposed populations, respectively. CONCLUSION: The economic evaluation showed atomoxetine is an effective alternative across a range of ADHD populations and offers value-for-money in the treatment of ADHD.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Captação Adrenérgica/economia , Inibidores da Captação Adrenérgica/uso terapêutico , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/economia , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/economia , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/uso terapêutico , Metilfenidato/economia , Metilfenidato/uso terapêutico , Modelos Econômicos , Propilaminas/economia , Propilaminas/uso terapêutico , Algoritmos , Cloridrato de Atomoxetina , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Cadeias de Markov , Método de Monte Carlo , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Reino Unido
3.
Pharmacol Res ; 57(5): 358-63, 2008 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18455425

RESUMO

To estimate the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in Italy and to investigate patient-related variables associated with the use of different antihyperglycemic therapies. This study was conducted between the years 2000-2003 from a source population comprising a cumulative sample of 394,719 patients from 320 General Practitioners across Italy, who provide information to the Health Search/Thales Database (HSD). A total sample of 23,729 of patients with type 2 diabetes age 15 years or older was selected from the source population. During the study years, the prevalence of type 2 diabetes increased from 4.7 to 6.0%. A significant increase in the use of antihyperglycemic therapy was also observed between 2000 and 2003. In particular, the use of biguanides increased. During the same period, the use of sulfonylurea monotherapy, oral combination therapy and insulin with oral combination therapy decreased. The results from the multivariate analysis revealed that healthier patients were more likely to be prescribed biguanide and sulfonylurea monotherapy, whereas patients with more diabetes complications and poorer glycemic control were more likely to be prescribed oral combination therapy or insulin (monotherapy or combination therapy). In conclusion, the study results appear to suggest that the prescribing patterns of Italian GPs and the predictors of different antihyperglycemic drug use are consistent with recent scientific evidence.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Biguanidas/administração & dosagem , Biguanidas/uso terapêutico , Bases de Dados Factuais , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/administração & dosagem , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/uso terapêutico
4.
Med Decis Making ; 25(1): 56-70, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15673582

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to use standard gamble (SG) utility interviews to assess parent preferences for health states of childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: The study was conducted in August 2003 in London, England. Parents (N=83) of children diagnosed with ADHD completed SG utility interviews, rating their child's current health and 14 hypothetical health states describing untreated ADHD and ADHD treated with a nonstimulant, immediate-release stimulant, or extended-release stimulant. Raw temporary utilities ranging from 0 (worst health) to 1 (best health) were adjusted to a chronic utility scale ranging from 0 (death) to 1 (best health) using a linear transformation. Parents rated the severity of their children's ADHD symptoms using the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS) and their children's health-related quality of life using the EuroQol EQ-5D. RESULTS: Raw and adjusted SG ratings of hypothetical health states ranged from 0.63-0.90 and 0.88-0.96, respectively. Parents' raw SG scores of their child's current health state (mean=0.72) were significantly correlated with inattentive, hyperactive, and overall ADHD symptoms (r=-0.25, -0.27, -0.27; P <0.05) and the EQ-5D visual analogue scale (r=0.26; P <0.05). CONCLUSION: This UK-based study suggests that parent SG interviews are a valid method for obtaining utilities for child ADHD-related health states. The utilities obtained in this study would be appropriate for use in a cost-utility analysis evaluating the costs and benefits of childhood ADHD treatments in the United Kingdom.


Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/tratamento farmacológico , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/uso terapêutico , Pais , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/classificação , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/efeitos adversos , Criança , Comportamento Infantil/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Londres , Masculino , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...