Computed tomographic study of the posterior condylar angle in arthritic knees: its use in the rotational positioning of the femoral implant of total knee prostheses.

The epicondylar axis is a reliable reference to check the rotation of the femoral implant in total knee prostheses (TKPs). However, during the operation it seems easier to use the posterior condylar axis as a landmark. The angle between these two axes is called the posterior condylar angle (PCA). The aim of this study was to measure the PCA in arthritic knees to assess the reliability of the posterior condylar axis as a reference for the control of the rotation of the femoral implant and to look for correlation with other radiological measurements. This prospective study consisted of 103 arthritic knees (81 varus, 22 valgus) before a TKP had been done in 103 patients (75 women, 28 men). The assessment of the PCA was made by computed tomographic scanning (CT). The HKA, HKS and HKT angles were measured on the pangonogram. The posterior condylar axis was internally rotated with respect to the epicondylar axis. The average value for all the patients was 2.65 degrees degrees with a range from 0 degrees to 7 degrees. The PCA was significantly increased in the valgus knees. There was no correlation between the angles on the pangonogram and the posterior condylar axis. While the preoperative assessment of the PCA by CT scanning is reliable, the results obtained indicate the marked variability in its value. If one wishes to use the posterior condylar axis as a guide for rotation, it is therefore necessary to assess the PCA for each patient using adjustable jigs according to the value obtained. No measurement on standard radiographs allowed an extrapolation of the value of the PCA, and CT scanning seems to be the preferable radiological examination.

Concomitant type I thyroplasty and thoracic operations for lung cancer: preventing respiratory complications associated with vagus or recurrent laryngeal nerve injury.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to prevent postoperative swallowing disorder, aspiration, and sputum retention in cases of recurrent laryngeal or vagus nerve section occurring during lung cancer resection. METHODS: In 14 of 25 consecutive patients, type I thyroplasty and thoracic operations were performed during the same period of anesthesia. All patients had a preoperative laryngeal computed tomographic scan providing us with indispensable measurements for vocal fold medialization under general anesthesia (ie, without intraoperative phonatory control). Nine remaining patients had a type I thyroplasty delayed from thoracic operations because of intraoperative doubt about laryngeal innervation injury, and 2 did not need a laryngeal operation. Main postoperative records consisted of swallowing ability, respiratory complications, and quality of voice. RESULTS: No swallowing disorder, aspiration, or sputum retention occurred in cases of concomitant laryngeal and thoracic operations. Of these 14 patients, a single case (7%) of major complication (vocal fold overmedialization) occurred and required an early and successful revision thyroplasty; one case of cervical hematoma that did not require surgical drainage was considered a minor complication (7%). Twelve (86%) patients who underwent the concomitant association of both operations were fully satisfied with their quality of voice. CONCLUSIONS: Type I thyroplasty and thoracic operation can be advantageously associated in case of injury to laryngeal motor innervation to prevent postoperative swallowing disability and dramatic respiratory complications.