Role of Intraluminal Esophageal Impedance Baseline in the Diagnosis of Esophagitis in Children.

Introduction Low values of esophageal impedance baseline (EIB) have been related to esophagitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of EIB for erosive esophagitis (ErE) and histological esophagitis (HiE) in children studied for gastroesophageal reflux. Material and Methods Children who underwent esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH) and upper-endoscopy with esophageal biopsies were studied retrospectively. EIB values were obtained by MII-pH. ErE was assessed by endoscopy following the Hetzel-Dent classification; HiE was defined by basal zone hyperplasia, papillary lengthening, or inflammatory infiltration. EIB was compared between groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were obtained to calculate the global diagnostic performance of EIB and to find cut-off values for sensitivity and specificity. Logistic regression was used for age adjustment. Results Fifty-one patients were studied: 11 had ErE and 23 had HiE. EIB median values were 1,159 in ErE versus 2,583 in non-ErE (U = 80, p < 0.01). The adjusted ROC curve analysis for ErE was 0.85 (95% CI = 0.74-0.96); the EIB cut-off value = 2,379 determined sensitivity = 100% and specificity = 52.6% in children < 4 years old. and sensitivity = 100% and specificity = 63.2% in children > 4 years old. EIB median values were 1,666 in HiE versus 2,669 in non-HiE (U = 80, p < 0.01). The adjusted ROC curve analysis for HiE was 0.75 (95% CI = 0.59-0.90); the EIB cut-off value = 2,296 determined sensitivity = 71.2% and specificity = 83.1% in children < 4 years old, and sensitivity = 75.1% and specificity = 80.1% in children > 4 years old. Conclusion EIB provides statistically significant diagnostic performances for ErE and HiE. It could become a useful tool, especially to discriminate between ErE and non-ErE, avoiding other invasive tests.

Surgical Findings in Transfusion-Associated Necrotizing Enterocolitis.

Introduction The extent of intestinal damage in transfusion-associated necrotizing enterocolitis (TNEC) has been scarcely studied. The aim of this investigation was to study surgical findings in TNEC and determine their severity considering the extent of the disease and risk of bowel perforation. Materials and Methods Neonates who required surgical treatment for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) were studied retrospectively. Patients who developed NEC within 48 hours after a red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) formed group TR48 and patients who did not receive a RBCT 48 hours before the diagnosis of NEC became group CN (conventional NEC). Both groups were compared: main outcomes were the extent of the disease (isolated, multifocal, or panintestinal), the existence of perforated NEC, and mortality. Categorical variables were analyzed with the chi-square test and continuous variables with the Mann-Whitney u-test. The relationship between RBCTs 48 hours before the diagnosis and the extent of intestinal disease was evaluated by ordinal logistic regression. Results Forty-seven patients were included in the study: 16 patients in TR48 and 31 in CN. The odds ratio of multifocal or panintestinal NEC for patients in TR48 was 0.5 (95% CI: 0.148-1.68). Neonates in TR48 had a relative risk (RR) of perforated NEC of 1.2 (95% CI: 0.76-1.85). The RR of death was 1.55 (95% CI: 0.76-3.14) in group TR48. Conclusion No differences in surgical findings between TR48 and CN could be demonstrated in this investigation; therefore, the hypothesis that intestinal damage might be more severe in TNEC was not confirmed.

Could clinical scores guide the surgical treatment of necrotizing enterocolitis?

PURPOSE: Test the diagnostic reliability of the score for neonatal acute physiology-perinatal extension-II (SNAPPE-II) and the metabolic derangement acuity score (MDAS) as predictors of surgery in patients with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). METHODS: The SNAPPE-II and the MDAS were applied to 99 patients with NEC. Both the scores were calculated at the moment of diagnosis (T(0)) and when surgical assessment was required (T(1)). The main outcome was the need of surgical revision. Comparison between models was made through their receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients required surgical treatment (group A) and 64 responded to medical therapy (group B). Median SNAPPE-II was 22 versus 5 for group A (U test 621, p = 0.002) at T(0); and 22 versus 10 for group A (U test 487, p = 0.01) at T(1). Measuring the value of the SNAPPE-II as a predictor of surgery, the ROC curve was 0.69 (CI 95%, 0.57-0.80) at T(0) and 0.67 (CI 95%, 0.55-0.80) at T(1). Median MDAS were 2 for both groups A and B at T(0) (U test 890.5, p = 0.113) and 2 versus 1.5 for group A at T(1) (U test 570, p = 0.043). The ROC curve for MDAS was 0.59 (CI 95%, 0.47-0.71) at T(0) and 0.64 (CI 95%, 0.52-0.77) at T(1). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic performance of the SNAPPE-II offers mild results in the moment of the diagnosis of NEC, and at T(1). The MDAS is non significant at T(0) and obtains moderate results at T(1). These results do not encourage using the SNAPPE-II and the MDAS as definite tools to decide for surgical treatment of the patients affected by NEC.

Diaphragmatic avulsion with chance fracture: a rare association in the seat belt syndrome.

Traumatic diaphragmatic injuries are uncommon in children. Chance fractures are typical in adults who had motor vehicle accidents but infrequent in children. The seat belt syndrome is characterized by a spectrum of injuries caused by the compression of the abdomen by the seat belt. It can affect the abdominal wall, hollow or solid organs, and the spine, but the association between diaphragmatic rupture and Chance fracture is extremely rare. We describe the case of a child who was involved in a car accident and who presented with multiple traumas; liver and lung injuries were first detected, and the patient was managed accordingly. During the hospital stay, a right diaphragmatic avulsion and a Chance fracture, which were initially missed, were diagnosed and treated successfully. The relevance of this case lies in the low incidence of the diaphragmatic rupture and the Chance fracture in children along with their exceptional association and in the diagnosis, which might be especially difficult in the acute setting.