Systemic disease presenting as cardiac tamponade: a case report.

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by multisystem inflammation and is a common cause of pericarditis and pericardial effusion, but significant pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade are rare and even rarer as the first manifestation. Case summary: We report the case of a young male who presented with fever, recurrent pericarditis, and polyserositis with pericardial and bilateral pleural effusion. On examination, he was haemodynamically unstable and the pericardial effusion had considerable dimensions and an urgent pericardiocentesis was performed. Antinuclear antibody with a speckled pattern was positive, complement C4 levels were low, and the remaining autoimmunity and infectious study was unremarkable. Considering the European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for SLE, a score of 11 points was obtained, confirming the diagnosis of SLE. Discussion: This case report illustrates a rare form of presentation of SLE, in which the first manifestation was pericarditis with polyserositis and cardiac tamponade.

Heart rate score in remote monitoring: An additional tool for predicting outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Heart rate score (HRS) ≥ 70% has been associated with arrhythmic events and mortality but these studies were not specific for heart failure (HF) patients. We hypothesized that HRS ≥ 70% obtained from remote monitoring (RM) is associated with HF hospitalizations and arrhythmic events in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS: HRS was calculated from RM in patients with HFrEF and ICD or CRT-D. Two groups were defined: HRS ≥ 70% (G1, n = 55) and HRS < 70% (G2, n = 48) RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included (64.4 ± 13.04 years, 69.9% male, mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 33.62 ± 11.97% and FUP 61.7 ± 38.87 months). The device was CRT-D in 59.2% and ICD in 40.8% and the majority (90.3%) had the device implanted in primary prevention. G1 patients were more frequently male (p = .017) and had more coronary disease (p = .035). HRS ≥70% was an independent predictor for unplanned HF hospitalizations (OR: 1.905 (95% CI: 1.328-3.649), p < .001)). The indication for device implantation (primary vs. secondary prevention), type of device, NYHA class, age, gender and LVEF were not independent predictors of the outcome. VF (4.9 ± 20.0 G1 vs. 1.1 ± 5.47 G2, p = .046) and VT episodes were more prevalent in G1 (3.1 ± 8.93 G1 vs. 0.3 ± 1.59 G2, p = .026), as well as appropriate device shocks (4.3 ± 12.06 G1 vs. 0.3 ± 1.49 G2, p = .023). There was no difference in inappropriate shocks or mortality outcomes between groups. CONCLUSION: HRS ≥70% obtained from RM was an independent predictor of HF hospitalizations and was associated with arrhythmic events with VT and VF episodes and appropriate device shocks in HFrEF patients.

Acute Chest Pain and Electrical Alternans.

A young man presented with acute stabbing chest pain. A 12-lead electrocardiogram revealed electrical alternans with phasic variation of the QRS amplitude in all leads. Lung auscultation revealed absent left hemithorax breath sounds. Chest radiography confirmed a left-sided tension pneumothorax. Tension pneumothorax is a very rare cause for electrical alternans. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).