The Impact of COVID-19 on Breast Cancer Care: A Qualitative Analysis of Surgeons' Perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: While studies have documented delays in breast cancer (BC) care during the COVID-19 pandemic due to healthcare restrictions, there have been no studies on the experiences, and, particularly, the challenges with providing care faced by breast surgeons during this unprecedented time. This paper aims to understand the perspectives of breast surgeons regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on BC care. METHODS: We used purposeful and snowball sampling to identify breast surgeons in Ontario, Canada. One-on-one qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted exploring the impact of the pandemic on BC treatment, psychosocial well-being of patients and providers, and the future state of BC care. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Thematic Analysis. RESULTS: A total of 10 breast surgeons (5 community and 5 academic) were interviewed. Breast surgeons reported that the pandemic led to increased multidisciplinary collaboration and innovations in delivery of BC surgery (e.g., increased use of regional anesthesia). Multiple surgeons identified that the pandemic created disparities in BC care based geographic location and that existing disparities in care based on ethnicity or marginalization were exacerbated. Last, surgeons identified that virtual care improved, but also created some challenges to how BC care was delivered, with many hoping for this to be continued after the pandemic was over. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, breast surgeons identified unique challenges and solutions to BC care delivery during the pandemic. Concerns regarding disparities in care based on geographic location and marginalized patients require further study to improve future BC care.

Mesenchymal Tumors of the Breast: Fibroblastic/Myofibroblastic Lesions and Other Lesions.

Mesenchymal breast tumors are a rare and diverse group of tumors that present some of the most challenging cases for multidisciplinary breast cancer teams. As a result of overlapping morphologies and a lack of large-scale studies on these tumors, practices are often heterogeneous and slow to evolve. Herein, we present a non-systematic review that focuses on progress, or lack thereof, in the field of mesenchymal breast tumors. We focus on tumors originating from fibroblastic/myofibroblastic cells and tumors originating from less common cellular origins (smooth muscle, neural tissue, adipose tissue, vascular tissue, etc.).

Racial, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in diagnosis, treatment, and survival of patients with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the influence of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES) on breast cancer outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of Non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Non-Hispanic White (NHW), and Hispanic patients with non-metastatic breast cancer in the SEER cancer registry between 2007 and 2016. RESULTS: A total of 382,975 patients were identified. On multivariate analysis, NHB (OR 1.18, 95%CI: 1.15-1.20) and Hispanic (OR 1.20, 95%CI: 1.17-1.22) patients were more likely to present with higher stage disease than NHW patients. There was an increased likelihood of not undergoing breast-reconstruction for NHB (OR 1.07, 95%CI: 1.03-1.11) and Hispanic patients (OR 1.60, 95%CI 1.54-1.66). NHB patients had increased hazard for all-cause mortality (HR: 1.13, 95%CI 1.10-1.16). All-cause mortality increased across SES categories (lower SES: HR 1.33, 95%CI 1.30-1.37, middle SES: HR 1.20, 95%CI 1.17-1.23). CONCLUSIONS: This population-based analysis confirms worse disease presentation, access to surgical therapy, and survival across racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic factors. These disparities were compounded across worsening SES and insurance coverage.

Association Between Surgeon and Anesthesiologist Sex Discordance and Postoperative Outcomes: A Population-based Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of surgeon-anesthesiologist sex discordance on postoperative outcomes. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Optimal surgical outcomes depend on teamwork, with surgeons and anesthesiologists forming two key components. There are sex and sex-based differences in interpersonal communication and medical practice which may contribute to patients' perioperative outcomes. METHODS: We performed a population-based, retrospective cohort study among adult patients undergoing 1 of 25 common elective or emergent surgical procedures from 2007 to 2019 in Ontario, Canada. We assessed the association between differences in sex between surgeon and anesthesiologists (sex discordance) on the primary endpoint of adverse postoperative outcome, defined as death, readmission, or complication within 30 days following surgery using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Among 1,165,711 patients treated by 3006 surgeons and 1477 anesthesiologists, 791,819 patients were treated by sex concordant teams (male surgeon/male anesthesiologist: 747,327 and female surgeon/female anesthesiologist: 44,492), whereas 373,892 were sex discordant (male surgeon/female anesthesiologist: 267,330 and female surgeon/male anesthesiologist: 106,562). Overall, 12.3% of patients experienced >1 adverse postoperative outcomes of whom 1.3% died. Sex discordance between surgeon and anesthesiologist was not associated with a significant increased likelihood of composite adverse postoperative outcomes (adjusted odds ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.97-1.03). CONCLUSIONS: We did not demonstrate an association between intraoperative surgeon and anesthesiologist sex discordance on adverse postoperative outcomes in a large patient cohort. Patients, clinicians, and administrators may be reassured that physician sex discordance in operating room teams is unlikely to clinically meaningfully affect patient outcomes after surgery.

Multidisciplinary Intervention in Radiation-Associated Angiosarcoma of the Breast: Patterns of Recurrence and Response to Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) of the breast is an aggressive malignancy affecting 1 in 1000 breast cancer patients. This study aimed to determine differences in treatments and outcomes for RAAS initially managed through a sarcoma multi-disciplinary team (SMDT) compared with an outside center (OC) and to describe outcomes after recurrence. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of breast RAAS between 2004 and 2019 were identified from our sarcoma database. Clinicopathologic characteristics, recurrence patterns, and factors predictive of survival were assessed. Differences in local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Surgery was performed for 49 women with RAAS, who had a median age of 74 years (range 41-89 years). Primary management was performed by SMDT for 26 patients and by OC for 23 patients. Radical mastectomy and reconstruction were performed for 96% of the SMDT group versus 17% of the OC group (p = 0.00001). The proportion patients who received chemotherapy, radiation, or both was 42.3% in the SMDT group and 0% in the OC group. During a median follow-up period of 26 months, recurrence was experienced by 38% (10/26) of the SMDT cohort and 83% (19/23) of the OC cohort (p = 0.002). The 3-year LRFS was better in the SMDT cohort (59.3% vs 31.8%; p = 0.019). Of the 29 recurrences 16 received chemotherapy and 6 received radiation, surgery, or both. At the last follow-up visit, 20 patients were in first remission, 1 patient was in second remission, 8 patients were alive with disease, and 20 patients had died of disease. CONCLUSION: Initial treatment by SMDT was associated with more extensive surgery, multimodal treatments, and a better 3-year LRFS. Patients with breast RAAS likely benefit from early referral and treatment by an SMDT.

Apical lymphadenectomy during low ligation of the IMA during rectosigmoid resection for cancer.

BACKGROUND: Low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery may decrease the risk of colorectal anastomotic ischemia compared to high ligation at its origin. Low ligation leaves apical nodes in situ and is therefore paired with apical lymphadenectomy. We sought to compare relevant oncologic outcomes between high ligation and low ligation plus apical lymphadenectomy in rectosigmoid resection for colorectal cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Patients receiving a rectosigmoid resection for cancer between January 2012 and July 2018 were included. Patients with metastatic disease and those who underwent low ligation without apical lymphadenectomy were excluded. Our primary outcome was nodal yield/metastasis. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications, local recurrence, and overall survival. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients underwent high ligation and 89 low ligation plus apical lymphadenectomy (median follow-up 20 months). In the low-ligation group, a median of 2 (interquartile range = 1-3) apical nodes was resected; 4.1% were malignant, increasing pathologic stage in 25% of these patients. There were no differences in nodal yield, complications, anastomotic leak, local recurrence, or overall survival. CONCLUSION: No differences were identified between high ligation and low ligation plus apical lymphadenectomy with respect to relevant clinical outcomes. Prospective trial data are needed to robustly establish the oncologic benefit and safety of the low ligation plus apical lymphadenectomy technique.

Clinicians' Perspectives on Barriers to Discussing Infertility and Fertility Preservation With Young Women With Cancer.

Importance: Infertility can be a devastating adverse effect of cancer treatment for young women. Fertility preservation may be an important and influential factor in treatment decisions. Despite American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines recommending discussion around potential infertility with patients, nearly 50% of young women with cancer remain uninformed. Objective: To understand and describe from clinicians' perspectives the barriers to discussing infertility and fertility preservation with young women with cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study used purposeful, maximum variation, and snowball sampling strategies to recruit 22 clinicians from cancer centers and community hospitals in 5 Canadian provinces, 5 practice areas, and 12 practice sites. Eligibility criteria included clinicians who regularly treat young women with cancer who might need fertility preservation. Telephone interviews that lasted between 30 to 75 minutes were conducted between May and November 2014 using a semistructured interview guide. Thematic analysis was used to discern the nature of barriers, and the Cabana framework was used to organize and interpret these findings. Analysis was conducted from May 2014 until May 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures: Clinician perspectives on what influences their nonadherence to American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines, which recommend discussing fertility preservation with patients. Results: A total of 22 clinicians were interviewed, including 8 medical oncologists, 4 surgical oncologists, 4 fertility specialists, 3 hematology and oncology specialists, and 3 nurse practitioners or clinician nurse specialists. Seventeen clinicians were women and 5 clinicians were men; the median (range) time in practice was 10 (0.67-37) years. Analysis suggested that clinicians' unfamiliarity with infertility risks, fertility preservation technologies, referral processes, and procedures, as well as environmental factors and their perceptions of fertility preservation, influenced their practices regarding fertility discussions. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this qualitative study suggest that the individual and environmental challenges that clinicians experience might negatively affect their willingness and ability to raise fertility-related issues with young women with cancer. Multiple strategies are needed to address these challenges to improve overall care of young women with cancer.

Indications for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: A Consensus Statement Using Modified Delphi Methodology.

OBJECTIVE: To reach a consensus about contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in unilateral breast cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: There has been a substantial increase in the number of North American women with unilateral breast cancer undergoing a therapeutic mastectomy and a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) either simultaneously or sequentially. The purpose of this project was to create a nationally endorsed consensus statement for CPM in women with unilateral breast cancer using modified Delphi consensus methodology. METHODS: A nationally representative expert panel of 19 general surgeons, 2 plastic surgeons, 2 medical oncologists, 2 radiation oncologists, and 1 psychologist was invited to participate in the generation of a consensus statement. Thirty-nine statements were created in 5 topic domains: predisposing risk factors for breast cancer, tumor factors, reconstruction/symmetry issues, patient factors, and miscellaneous factors. Panelists were asked to rate statements on a 7-point Likert scale. Two electronic rounds of iterative rating and feedback were anonymously completed, followed by an in-person meeting. Consensus was reached when there was at least 80% agreement. RESULTS: Our panelists did not recommend for average risk women with unilateral breast cancer. The panel recommended CPM for women with a unilateral breast cancer and previous Mantle field radiation or a BrCa1/2 gene mutation. The panel agreed that CPM could be considered by the surgeon on an individual basis for: women with unilateral breast cancer and a genetic mutation in the CHEK2/PTEN/p53/PALB2/CDH1 gene, and in women who may have significant difficulty achieving symmetry after unilateral mastectomy. CONCLUSION: Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy is rarely recommended for women with unilateral breast cancer.

'Taking control of cancer': understanding women's choice for mastectomy.

PURPOSE: Rates of both unilateral (UM) and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) for unilateral early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) have been increasing since 2003. Recent studies suggest that this increase may be due to women choosing UM and CPM because of fear. We conducted an in-depth qualitative study to identify those factors influencing a woman's choice for more extensive surgery. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with breast cancer patients to examine the experiences, decision making, and choice of UM ± CPM for the treatment of ESBC. Purposive sampling identified suitable candidates for breast-conserving therapy (BCT) who underwent UM ± CPM. Interviews were guided by grounded theory methodology, and constant comparative analysis identified key concepts and themes. RESULTS: Data saturation was achieved after 29 interviews. 'Taking control of cancer' was the dominant theme. Fear of breast cancer was expressed at diagnosis and remained throughout decision making. Personal experiences of family or friends 'living with cancer' were the most influential source of information during the decision-making process. Fear translated into an overestimated risk of recurrence, contralateral breast cancer (CBC), and death. Despite surgeons discussing equivalent survival with BCT, UM ± CPM patients believed that by choosing UM ± CPM they would eliminate recurrence, CBC and live longer. By choosing more extensive surgery, women were actively trying to control cancer outcomes as more surgery was believed to offer greater survival. CONCLUSIONS: Women seek UM and CPM to take control of cancer and manage their fear. It is important for surgeons to understand how personal experiences shape women's choice for UM ± CPM to facilitate informed decision making.

Increasing mastectomy rates-the effect of environmental factors on the choice for mastectomy: a comparative analysis between Canada and the United States.

PURPOSE: Unilateral mastectomy (UM) and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) for early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) have been increasing. Numerous etiological factors for this rise have been suggested, including increasing use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and reconstruction, surgeon's preference, and patient's choice. We conducted a qualitative study to explore what role the surgeon and their practice environment play in the increasing rates. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with general surgeons to explore their current approach to treating ESBC and their experience with women requesting mastectomy. Purposive sampling identified surgeons across Ontario, Canada, and the United States (US). Constant comparative analysis identified key concepts. RESULTS: Data saturation was achieved after 45 interviews. 'The effect of external factors on rising mastectomy rates' was the dominant theme. All surgeons described increasing mastectomy rates over the last 5 years, and all surgeons discussed breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and UM as equivalent options. However, US surgeons discussed reconstruction early in the consultation process, reflecting legislative requirements. In contrast, Ontario surgeons discussed reconstruction only when a patient was considering mastectomy. Ontario surgeons often recommended BCT, whereas US surgeons rarely made a direct recommendation regarding the extent of surgery. Neither US nor Canadian surgeons recommended the use of UM + CPM in average-risk ESBC, and all surgeons described women initiating this request. MRI use and access to immediate breast reconstruction also impacted the choice for mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Use of MRI, access to reconstruction, and legislative requirements regarding information disclosure, appeared to influence the surgical consultation process and the patient's request for CPM.

Embryonic and neonatal phenotyping of genetically engineered mice.

Considerable progress has been made in adapting existing and developing new technologies to enable increasingly detailed phenotypic information to be obtained in embryonic and newborn mice. Sophisticated methods for imaging mouse embryos and newborns are available and include ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for in vivo imaging, and MRI, vascular corrosion casts, micro-computed tomography, and optical projection tomography (OPT) for postmortem imaging. In addition, Doppler and M-mode ultrasound are useful noninvasive tools to monitor cardiac and vascular hemodynamics in vivo in embryos and newborns. The developmental stage of the animals being phenotyped is an important consideration when selecting the appropriate technique for anesthesia or euthanasia and for labeling animals in longitudinal studies. Study design also needs to control for possible differences between inter- and intralitter variability, and for possible long-term developmental effects caused by anesthesia and/or procedures. Noninvasive or minimally invasive intravenous or intracardiac injections or blood sampling, and arterial pressure and electrocardiography (ECG) measurements are feasible in newborns. Whereas microinjection techniques are available for embryos as young as 6.5 days of gestation, further advances are required to enable minimally invasive fluid or tissue samples, or blood pressure or ECG measurements, to be obtained from mouse embryos in utero. The growing repertoire of techniques available for phenotyping mouse embryos and newborns promises to accelerate knowledge gained from studies using genetically engineered mice to understand molecular regulation of morphogenesis and the etiology of congenital diseases.