Reduction of Unnecessary Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Hospitalized Patients.

BACKGROUND: Many patients undergoing gastrostomy tube placement at one academic medical center were able to resume an oral diet prior to discharge or did not survive hospitalization. The objective of this study was to reduce placement of nonbeneficial gastrostomy tubes and to maintain or improve adherence to gastrostomy tube guidelines. METHODS: In February 2017 the Acute Care Surgery service began an initiative in which gastrostomy tube placement was deferred until the patient was deemed medically stable for discharge. This study retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, January 2014-January 2017, prior to the intervention, and February 2017-December 2019, after the intervention. Primary outcomes included the proportion of patients undergoing PEG tube placement who resumed an oral diet or who died during the index hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included the timing of the PEG tube placement. RESULTS: PEGs were placed in 240 patients in the preintervention period and in 171 patients in the postintervention period. In the postintervention period, there was a lower percentage of patients resuming oral diet after PEG placement (17.1% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.0049), a lower duration between stroke diagnosis and PEG placement (mean of 21.0 days vs. 17,1 days, p = 0.0305), and a lower duration between PEG placement and hospital discharge (mean of 19.7 days vs. 13.6 days, p = 0.0035). CONCLUSION: Intentional delay in PEG placement until patients were medically stabilized and approaching discharge was associated with a reduction in unnecessary procedures and an overall reduction in the number of procedures, while maintaining alignment with clinical guidelines and avoiding delays in discharge attributable to the procedure.

Association Between Patient-Reported Frailty and Non-Home Discharge Among Older Adults Undergoing Surgery.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Identifying surgical patients at risk for discharge to a post-acute facility has the potential to reduce hospital length of stay, improve postoperative planning, and increase patient satisfaction. We sought to examine the association between a positive response to a preoperative patient-reported frailty screen and non-home discharge (NHD). DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Urban tertiary academic preoperative evaluation center. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of patients aged 60 and older evaluated from November 2018 to August 2019) undergoing one of 14 major elective general and vascular operations with an expected length of stay of 3 days or longer. METHODS: Items from the previously validated Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illnesses, Loss of weight (FRAIL) screen were modified, and patients were queried on fatigue, activity against resistance, ambulation, and weight loss. Multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age and sex was used to determine the association between patient-reported items and NHD. RESULTS: A total of 230 patients were included for analysis. The average age of the cohort was 70.1 (standard deviation = 7.1); 91.7% were White, and 52.4% were female. There were 24 patients (10.4%) who were not discharged home. They were more likely to report fatigue (54% vs 29%; P = .01), weight loss (58% vs 21%; P < .01), and difficulty with activity against resistance (33% vs 7%; P < .01) before surgery. In adjusted analysis, patients who self-reported frailty (FRAIL screen ≥2) were significantly more likely to have an NHD (odds ratio [OR] = 4.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.7-11.7; P < .01), as were patients who responded "yes" to any question from the FRAIL screen (OR = 2.5; 95% CI = 1.7-3.5; P < .01). A positive response to difficulty with activity against resistance or recent weight loss showed similar odds of NHD (OR = 7.6; 95% CI = 2.6-23.9; P < .01; and OR = 7.9; 95% CI = 2.9-21.6; P < .01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patient response to screening questions on the FRAIL screen identified those at highest risk of NHD. The FRAIL screening tool is practical, easy to apply, and could be used during preoperative counseling to identify patients likely to have increased discharge planning needs.

Liver resection for extra-pancreatic biliary cancer: what is the role of laparoscopic approach?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has evolved over time, yet its role in extra-pancreatic biliary cancer has been limited due to several factors. We aimed to evaluate the short-term outcome of LLR in extra-pancreatic biliary tract cancer. METHODS: From January 2002 to 2016, all patients who underwent LLR for extra-pancreatic biliary tract cancer including gallbladder cancer (GBC), intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), and peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) with curative intent (R0 or R1) at Institute Mutualiste Montsouris were identified from prospectively collected databases. Patient characteristics, and perioperative outcomes, were analyzed in all three groups. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were included: 10 with GBC, 14 with ICC, and 11 with PHC. There were 19 (54%) women and median age was 71 years. Median operative time was 240 min, and estimated blood loss was 200 ml. Conversion to an open procedure was more common in patients with PHC (45% vs. 7% for ICC and 0% for GBC, p = 0.010). R0 resection was achieved in 10 (100%), 12 (86%), and 8 (73%) patients in GBC, ICC, and PHC groups, respectively (p = 0.204). Postoperative morbidity was reported in 19 (54%) patients of whom 12 (34%) had minor complications. Postoperative mortality was reported in 4 (11%) patients; one (7%) in GBC group, one (7%) in ICC group, and two (18%) in PHC, p = 0.681. Median hospital stay was 11 days. CONCLUSIONS: The present series suggests that LLR is feasible in GBC, challenging but achievable in ICC but unsuitable for the moment in PHC.

Resection of an Esophageal Diverticulum by Thoracoscopy in Prone Position.

Diverticula of the middle one third of the esophagus are rare clinical entities, by comparison with the more common epiphrenic diverticula. For midesophageal diverticula, a minimally invasive approach has not been standardized. This report presents the case of a 60-year-old man with a large midesophageal diverticulum who was treated successfully by four-port video-assisted thoracic surgery while he was in the prone position. Thoracoscopy is a good approach for direct visualization of the diverticulum, and the prone position has several advantages to help clear the view. Routine myotomy for middle one-third diverticula is not advised, given the risk of poor functional results and diverticulization of the myotomy itself.

Total Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Venous Reconstruction for Pancreatic Head Cancer with Involvement of the Superior Mesenteric Vein-Portal Vein Confluence.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with venous reconstruction is not commonly performed due to its technical challenges. In this video, we focus on the technical aspects for how to perform this procedure safely. METHODS: In a 69-year-old female with jaundice and diarrhea, a computed tomography scan showed a mass in the head of the pancreas, with a 180-degree involvement of the superior mesenteric vein. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with stenting was performed together with endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration. Biopsy showed well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent six cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with reduction of the vein involvement to 90 degrees. The mass invaded the right lateral aspect of the superior mesenteric vein-portal vein confluence. As a result, this portion of the vein was removed en bloc with the specimen. The vascular defect was repaired using two running sutures. Once the choledocojejunostomy and intussuscepted pancreatico-gastric anastomosis were completed, the specimen was removed via a small subxiphoid incision. RESULTS: Operative time was 6 h and 30 min, blood loss was 50 mL, and hospital stay was 12 days. Histopathological examination was ypT3 N1 (1 of 18 lymph nodes was positive). All margins were negative. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular reconstruction can be performed safely in selected cases of pancreatic head cancer with vein involvement. Advanced laparoscopic skills are necessary to complete such procedures safely.

Laparoscopic extended liver resection: are postoperative outcomes different?

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic major hepatectomy (LMH) is becoming increasingly common in specialized centers, data regarding laparoscopic extended major hepatectomies (LEMH) and their outcomes are limited. The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes of LEMH to standard LMH. METHODS: All patients who underwent purely laparoscopic anatomical right or left hepatectomy and right or left trisectionectomy between February 1998 and January 2016 are enrolled. Demographic, clinicopathological, and perioperative factors were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. Perioperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes in LEMH were compared to those of standard LMH. RESULTS: Among 195 patients with LMH, 47 (24.1%) underwent LEMH, colorectal liver metastases representing 66.7% of all indications. Preoperative portal vein embolization was undertaken in 31 (15.9%) patients. Despite more frequent vascular clamping, blood loss was higher in LEMH group (400 vs. 214 ml; p = 0.006). However, there was no difference in intraoperative transfusion requirements. Thirty-one patients experienced liver failure with no differences between LMH and LEMH groups. Postoperative mortality was comparable in the two groups [3 (2.5%) LMH patients vs. 2 (5%) LEMH patients (p = 0.388)]. Overall morbidity was higher in the LEMH group [49 LMH patients (41.5%) vs. 24 LEMH patients (60%) (p = 0.052)]. Patients treated with left LEMH experienced more biliary leakage (p = 0.011) and more major pulmonary complications (p = 0.015) than left LMH. CONCLUSION: LEMH is feasible at the price of important morbidity, with manageable and acceptable outcomes. These exigent procedures require high-volume centers with experienced surgeons.