Anticoagulant Prescribing Patterns in New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication after cardiac surgery and is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic stroke. Recommendations regarding the optimal anticoagulant, timing of initiation, and duration of therapy remain uncertain. METHODS: Administrative databases were used to include adult patients who presented with POAF after cardiac surgery between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. Key exclusion criteria included preexisting atrial fibrillation, mechanical valve replacement, or anticoagulant prescription fill within 6 months before the index admission. RESULTS: A total of 3214 of patients were included, and 878 (27.3%) were prescribed an oral anticoagulant (OAC) on discharge, with 536 (61%) prescribed warfarin and 342 (39%) prescribed a direct OAC. More than half of the patients (56.1%) stopped their OAC by 6 months. There was no difference in stroke or systemic embolism at 30 days, 3 months, or 6 months between those with and without anticoagulation prescribed. However, those on any OAC had higher rates of any bleeding at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of patients who presented with POAF after cardiac surgery were prescribed OAC, with warfarin being the most common agent. OAC initiation was associated with increased bleeding risk, warranting special consideration when assessing a patient's risk of stroke with the increased risk of bleeding, particularly in the postoperative period.

Practical Pharmacological Treatment of Heart Failure: Does Ejection Fraction Matter Anymore?

Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome involving structural and/or functional abnormalities of the heart. Heart failure is often classified based on left ventricular ejection fraction, which serves as a predictor of mortality. The majority of the data supporting disease-modifying pharmacological therapies are from patients with reduced ejection fraction (less than 40%). However, with the recent results from the sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor trials, there is renewed interest in identifying potential beneficial pharmacological therapies. This review focuses on and includes pharmacological HF therapies across the spectrum of ejection fraction, providing an overview of the novel trials. We also examined the effects of the treatments on mortality, hospitalization, functional status, and biomarker levels to further investigate the interplay between ejection fraction and HF.

Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Strategies Following Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) Explantation or Decommissioning: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

Mechanical circulatory support using left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) has transformed management of patients with end-stage heart failure with more patients on LVAD therapy surviving long enough to necessitate either device explantation or decommissioning. Usually, there is foreign material retained following these procedures that requires maintaining antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy. However, there is no consensus on optimal management of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy following LVAD explantation or decommissioning. We conducted a scoping review of antiplatelet and anticoagulation strategies, searching EMBASE, PubMed and CENTRAL. A total of 15 case reports and series encompassing 38 patient cases were found that met inclusion criteria. There was a heterogeneity of LVAD types and techniques used for explantation and decommissioning. Most reports identified in our review maintained patients on a vitamin K antagonist for at least 3 months post-explantation or decommissioning with or without concomitant antiplatelet therapy with low-dose aspirin. However, there was no single agreed-upon optimal strategy for antiplatelet and anticoagulant use post-procedure. Factors such as the degree of foreign material retained following device explantation or decommissioning and whether there is another indication for anticoagulation or antiplatelet use must be considered. A lack of overall consensus indicates that more studies are needed in this area to establish definitive guidelines around antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy following LVAD explantation or decommissioning.

Correlation between Medication Administration-Related Errors in Patients with Parkinson Disease and Timing of Pharmacy-Led Best Possible Medication Histories.

BACKGROUND: Poor prescribing and incomplete medication administration have been linked to increased lengths of hospitalization for patients with Parkinson disease. The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) has recommended that patients with Parkinson disease receive a pharmacy consultation within 2 h of admission to hospital. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether the time for a pharmacy team member to obtain a best possible medication history (BPMH) was associated with administration-related medication errors. The primary outcome was the proportion of doses with a medication error during a patient's admission in relation to the time to completion of the initial BPMH by a registered pharmacist (RPh) or registered pharmacy technician (RPhT). The secondary objective was to compare the proportion of doses with a medication error in relation to whether the BPMH was completed by an RPh or an RPhT. METHODS: This retrospective chart review involved patients with Parkinson disease who were admitted to the medicine services at London Health Sciences Centre from September 30, 2014, to September 30, 2018. Patients were included if they had Parkinson disease and a medication regimen that included levodopa-carbidopa. For all patients, an RPhT or RPh conducted the initial BPMH or updated the BPMH. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine whether a correlation existed between administration-related errors and completion of the BPMH by a pharmacy staff member. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients with 104 admissions were included. There was no significant correlation between the time to completion of the initial BPMH by a pharmacy team member and the proportion of doses with medication errors (p = 0.32). Although RPhTs completed the BPMHs more quickly than RPhs (p < 0.001), there was no significant difference between pharmacy team members in terms of the proportion of doses with medication errors (p = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Completing a BPMH within 2 h of a patient's admission, as per the ISMP recommendation, is unlikely to affect administration-related medication errors, given that no correlation was identified. Expediting BPMH without addressing other factors is insufficient, and initiatives are required to improve the medication administration process.

CONTEXTE: La mauvaise prescription et l'administration incomplète de médicaments ont été liées à une augmentation de la durée du séjour à l'hôpital des patients atteints de la maladie de Parkinson. L'Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) a recommandé que les patients atteints de la maladie de Parkinson obtiennent une consultation en pharmacie dans les 2 heures après leur admission à l'hôpital. OBJECTIFS: Vérifier si le temps d'attente pour l'obtention, par un membre de l'équipe de la pharmacie, du meilleur schéma thérapeutique possible (MSTP) était associé ou non à des erreurs de médication liées à l'administration. Le résultat principal portait sur la proportion des doses comportant une erreur de médication lors de l'admission d'un patient par rapport au temps nécessaire à un pharmacien ou à un technicien en pharmacie autorisés pour réaliser le MSTP initial. L'objectif secondaire visait à comparer la proportion des doses comportant une erreur de médication entre un MSTP réalisé par un pharmacien autorisé et un MSTP réalisé par un technicien en pharmacie autorisé. MÉTHODES: Cet examen rétrospectif des dossiers impliquait des patients atteints de la maladie de Parkinson ayant été admis aux services de médecine au London Health Sciences Centre entre le 30 septembre 2014 et le 30 septembre 2018. Les patients pouvaient participer à l'étude s'ils avaient la maladie de Parkinson et qu'ils suivaient un traitement médicamenteux comprenant du lévodopa-carbidopa. Un pharmacien autorisé ou un technicien en pharmacie autorisé réalisait ou actualisait le MSTP initial de tous les patients. La corrélation de Pearson a servi à déterminer s'il existait une corrélation entre les erreurs liées à l'administration et la réalisation du MSTP par un membre du personnel de la pharmacie. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 84 patients correspondant à 104 admissions ont été inclus dans l'étude. Il n'y avait aucune corrélation importante entre le moment de la réalisation du MSTP initial par un membre du personnel de la pharmacie et la proportion des doses comportant des erreurs de médication (p = 0,32). Bien que les techniciens en pharmacie autorisés aient terminé plus rapidement leur MSTP que les pharmaciens autorisés (p < 0,001), aucune différence importante n'a été notée entre les membres du personnel de la pharmacie en termes de proportion des doses et d'erreur de médication (p = 0,86). CONCLUSIONS: Il est peu probable que la réalisation d'un MSTP dans les 2 heures après l'admission d'un patient, conformément à la recommandation de l'ISMP, ait une influence sur les erreurs de médication liées à l'administration, vu qu'aucune corrélation n'a été décelée. Précipiter la réalisation du MSTP sans aborder les autres facteurs ne suffit pas et des actions sont nécessaires pour améliorer le processus d'administration des médicaments.