Transverse patella fracture fixation: A cadaveric biomechanical comparison of cannulated screws and anterior tension band versus low-profile, multiplanar mesh plating.

INTRODUCTION: Multiplanar mesh plating of patella fractures has become more popular in recent years. It was the goal of this study to compare the biomechanical stability of cannulated screw with anterior tension band to multiplanar mesh plating for fixation of transverse patella fractures in cadaver specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight matched pairs of fresh frozen cadaveric knees were obtained and soft tissues dissected leaving the extensor mechanism, joint capsule, and retinaculum intact. Transverse fractures were created at the mid-portion of the patella. For each pair, one specimen was repaired using cannulated screws with anterior tension band, and the second was repaired using multiplanar mesh plating. Each specimen underwent cyclic extension loading with loads increasing by 1.1 kg after every 50 cycles. Interfragmentary displacement was measured at the end of each interval at both 5° and 45° of knee flexion angle, with fixation failure defined by >2 mm displacement. RESULTS: The specimens fixed with multiplanar mesh plating survived more cycles and higher loads than the specimens fixed with cannulated screws with anterior tension band (p = 0.011 comparing survival plots). After 150 cycles of extension loading, 3 of 8 of the specimens fixed with screws/tension band had failed, whereas none of the mesh plated specimens had failed. After 400 cycles, 7 of 8 of the screws/tension band had failed, whereas half of the mesh plated specimens had failed. CONCLUSIONS: While a more technically challenging and expensive technique, mesh plating for patella fractures appears to offer greater durability than traditional cannulated screw with tension banding.

Biomechanical Comparison of Fibertape Device Repair Techniques of Ligamentous Lisfranc Injury in a Cadaveric Model.

BACKGROUND: Lisfranc ligamentous injuries are complex, and their treatment, along with the preferred method of fixation, is controversial. Implementing a flexible synthetic augmentation device (fibertape) has been described as an alternative to traditional screw fixation. This biomechanical study evaluated two fibertape devices with interference screw fixation: InternalBrace, and InternalBrace with supplementary intercuneiform stabilization. METHODS: The diastasis and relative angular displacement between bones were measured at three midfoot joints in the Lisfranc articulation. Measurements were obtained for the pre-injured, injured, and post-fixation stages under static loading. Specimens then underwent stepwise increases in cyclic loading performed at 1 Hz and 100 cycles, at 100 N ground reaction force intervals from 500 to 1200 N to simulate postoperative loading, and then up to 1800 N to simulate high loads. Failure of fixation was defined as diastasis greater than 2 millimeters at the second-metatarsal - medial-cuneiform joint. RESULTS: InternalBrace specimens demonstrated failures in 3 of 9 (33%) specimens at cyclic loads of 1000 N. Conversely, InternalBrace with Supplementary Limb specimens had 1 failure at 1200 N. The difference in diastasis at the second metatarsal-medial cuneiform joint was statistically significant between the two groups at higher loads of 1600N (p = 0.019) and 1800N (p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: The use of InternalBrace for ligamentous Lisfranc injuries appears to provide a biomechanically viable alternative for withstanding early postoperative protected weight bearing. Furthermore, the use of a supplementary limb in addition to the InternalBrace fibertape fixation method appears to enhance its biomechanical efficacy.