Safe and Effective Restoration of Jawline Definition With Hyaluronic Acid Injectable Gel VYC-25L: Results From a Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: A well-defined jawline improves overall facial aesthetics, thus motivating patients to seek jawline augmentation. OBJECTIVES: This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the hyaluronic acid injectable gel VYC-25L for restoring jawline definition. METHODS: A US multicenter, evaluator-blinded study randomized adults with grade 2 (moderate) or 3 (severe) Allergan Loss of Jawline Definition Scale (ALJDS) scores. Participants were randomized to VYC-25L treatment group or control group at study onset, with 12 months follow-up. The control group had the option to receive treatment after 6 months (primary endpoint completion). Effectiveness measures included month 6 ALJDS responders rate (proportion of participants with ≥1-grade improvement from baseline on both sides), FACE-Q Satisfaction With Lower Face and Jawline scores, and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) responders (improved/much improved) as assessed by the investigator and participants. Injection site responses (ISRs) and adverse events (AEs) were monitored. RESULTS: At month 6, ALJDS responder rates were 69.0% versus 38.0% in the VYC-25L treatment (n = 157) and control (n = 49) groups, respectively (p = .0001). In the VYC-25L treatment group, FACE-Q scores improved by a mean of 45.9 points versus baseline at month 6 (p < .0001). Furthermore, 88.4% and 89.0% of participants in the VYC-25L treatment group were GAIS responders on month 6 by participant- and investigator-assessment, respectively. Most ISRs were mild or moderate and resolved within 2 weeks. Most treatment-related AEs were mild and resolved within a week. CONCLUSIONS: VYC-25L safely and effectively restores jawline definition through 1 year.

Safety and Duration of Effect of 40U PrabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines in Adult Patients: A Phase II, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double Blind, Active-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Extending the duration of effect of botulinum toxins - by administering doses beyond those of the approved labels - has been an area of increasing interest in the field of aesthetics. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the safety and duration of effect of 40U prabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs (twice the approved dose and concentration) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines. METHODS: 154 adult patients were randomized 1:1:1 to a single treatment of either 40U prabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs (PRA 40, 5 injections of 8U/0.05 mL), or 20U of either prabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs (PRA 20) or onabotulinumtoxinA (ONA 20). Both 20U controls were administered as 5 injections of 4U/0.1 mL. Efficacy and safety were assessed on Days 2, 7 (by phone), 30 and every 30 days thereafter up to 365 days or until the patient had returned to Baseline. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the duration of effect (estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis), defined as the number of days from Treatment Day (Baseline) to the day that glabellar line severity at maximum frown by investigator assessment returned to the baseline value. RESULTS: Patients had a mean age of 47 years (20-72 years); 69.5% had severe glabellar lines at Baseline. Of the 36 adverse events, 32 (88.9%) were mild and 4 (11.1%) were moderate in severity; none were serious. The median durations of effect were estimated to be 183, 149 and 148 days for PRA 40-, PRA 20- and ONA 20-treated patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this Phase II pilot study, 40U prabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs was observed to be safe and had a duration of 6 months.

LetibotulinumtoxinA Attenuates the Psychological Burden of Glabellar Lines and Is Associated With High Subject Satisfaction in Phase 3 Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: Hyperfunctional glabellar frown lines can transmit facial miscues that adversely affect emotional communication, increase perceptions of age, and diminish self-esteem. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of letibotulinumtoxinA in mitigating the negative psychological impact associated with moderate to severe glabellar lines and to assess subject satisfaction with treatment outcome in the BLESS phase 3 clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Baseline and posttreatment assessments were made using validated subject-administered instruments: Modified Skindex-16 Glabellar Line Quality of Life (GL-QoL) Scale, Facial Assessment and Cosmetic Evaluation Questionnaire (FACE-Q) Appraisal of Lines Between Eyebrows Scale, FACE-Q Age Appraisal Visual Analog Scale, and FACE-Q Satisfaction with Outcome Scale. An integrated analysis using pooled BLESS data was conducted on these secondary end points. RESULTS: Among enrolled and treated subjects ( N = 1,272), 85.5% had moderate to severe psychological impact at baseline. LetibotulinumtoxinA subjects experienced significant improvements compared with placebo on all measures. Mean improvement to Week 4 for the Modified Skindex-16 GL-QoL Scale overall score was -33.84 for letibotulinumtoxinA subjects compared with -1.37 for placebo subjects ( p < .001). Attenuation of psychological burden was highly correlated with improvement in glabellar line severity ( p < .0001). CONCLUSION: LetibotulinumtoxinA significantly improved the psychosocial burden associated with glabellar lines across all trials. Treated subjects experienced improved quality of life, younger perceived age, and satisfaction with treatment outcome.

Efficacy and Safety of Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers Injected with a Cannula: A Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Split-Face Controlled Study.

Purpose: Cannulas are increasingly used for injecting hyaluronic acid fillers, as they are thought to improve patient comfort safety and treatment tolerability. This study aimed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of a Resilient Hyaluronic Acid 4 (RHA 4) filler injected with a cannula versus a needle for the treatment of moderate to severe nasolabial folds (NLF). Patients and Methods: A total of 50 subjects were included in a randomized, evaluator-blinded, split-face trial. The NLF were injected with RHA 4 using a cannula on one side of the face and using a needle on the other side on Day 0. A touch-up could be performed 4 weeks later. The subjects were followed up for 12 weeks after the last injection, ie, injection on Day 0 or touch-up. Efficacy was evaluated using a Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and patient-reported outcomes. Safety assessments included the injection-site pain, common treatment reactions (CTRs), and adverse events (AEs). Results: Twelve weeks after the last injection, the efficacy of the cannula treatment was found to be non-inferior to that of the needle treatment, based on the WSRS score improvements. The other study endpoints showed the equivalent efficacy and safety of the two methods. No serious or unexpected AEs were reported. Conclusion: RHA 4 may be effectively and safely injected into the NLF using a cannula or a needle, provided it is administrated by a trained practitioner.

PrabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of glabellar lines in adults, 65 years of age and older: The fourth in a series of post hoc analyses of the phase III clinical study data.

BACKGROUND: Despite the absence of Phase III clinical trial data to support their use, 3.4% of all neurotoxin treatments performed internationally for esthetic purposes in 2020 were performed in patients 65 years of age and older. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and safety of prabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines in the subset of Phase III clinical trial participants who were 65 years of age and older. METHODS: Post hoc analyses were performed on all patients who had been treated with a single dose of 20 U prabotulinumtoxinA in the three 150-day, placebo-controlled Phase III glabellar line clinical studies. Patients were grouped by age: ≥65 years (n = 70) versus <65 years (n = 667). The endpoints of primary interest were the proportion of responders with a ≥1-point improvement from baseline at maximum frown on the 4-point Glabellar Line Scale and treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: For the efficacy endpoint of primary interest, responder rates among patients 65 years of age and older were numerically less than those of patients less than 65 years by an absolute mean difference of just -2.7% across all visits; none of the differences at any visit were statistically significant. The most common treatment-related adverse event was headache, occurring in 5.7% of those 65 years of age and older and in 9.7% of those less than 65 years. CONCLUSIONS: 20 U prabotulinumtoxinA administered for the treatment of glabellar lines was efficacious in patients 65 years of age and older; it was also well tolerated by this cohort.

Infraorbital Hollow Rejuvenation: Considerations, Complications, and the Contributions of Midface Volumization.

Infraorbital hollows are one of the most common target areas for facial aesthetic treatment; however, they are often perceived to be challenging to treat due to the complex anatomy of the periorbital area, concurrent deformities, and risk of complications. Treatment options include surgical (eg, lower eyelid blepharoplasty with fat transposition or injections) and nonsurgical approaches (eg, fillers). Among these approaches, filler injections have become common practice because they are minimally invasive and provide long-term patient satisfaction. In particular, hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers have been shown to be safe and effective for infraorbital hollow rejuvenation. This review provides an overview of infraorbital hollows, including periorbital anatomy, etiology, clinical assessment, and overlapping deformities, such as malar mounds, festoons, and dark circles under the eyes. Patient and HA filler product selection, injection techniques, as well as potential adverse events, such as bruising/swelling, lower eyelid and malar edema, and vascular occlusions, are discussed. This review also highlights the importance of midfacial volumization to improve outcomes in the infraorbital region and in the overall aesthetic appearance. By selecting appropriate patients and attaining proficiency in periorbital anatomy and infraorbital hollow rejuvenation techniques, clinicians can safely and successfully perform HA filler injections that result in high patient satisfaction.

High Patient Satisfaction for up to 6 Months With OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment for Upper Facial Lines.

BACKGROUND: OnabotulinumtoxinA safety and efficacy are well established for upper facial lines (UFL), including forehead lines (FHL), glabellar lines (GL), and crow's feet lines (CFL). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of onabotulinumtoxinA efficacy with patient-reported psychological impacts and satisfaction in UFL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pooled analysis of data from 4 pivotal Phase 3 trials (onabotulinumtoxinA vs placebo in FHL ± GL, FHL + GL ± CFL, CFL, and CFL + GL for ≤180 days) evaluated investigator-assessed ≥1-grade severity improvement on the Allergan Facial Wrinkle Scale at Day 30 (responders). Facial Line Outcomes (FLO-11) Questionnaire, Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire (FLSQ), and Subject Assessment of Satisfaction of Appearance (SASA) were used to evaluate responder appearance-related psychological impacts and satisfaction. RESULTS: OnabotulinumtoxinA patients, by primary study focus (FHL, GL, or CFL), totaled 921, 921, and 833, respectively; 786 patients received placebo. Most patients were female, White, and aged 45 to 50 years (median). Through 150 days, >42% FHL, >43% GL, and ≥32% CFL patients were onabotulinumtoxinA responders. Responders reported improvements in appearance-related psychological impacts (FLO-11) and high satisfaction (FLSQ and SASA), sustained through ≥150 days. CONCLUSION: A ≥1-grade improvement with onabotulinumtoxinA is a clinically meaningful outcome in UFL, associated with long-lasting improved patient-reported psychological impacts and high satisfaction.

Safety, Pharmacodynamic Response, and Treatment Satisfaction With OnabotulinumtoxinA 40 U, 60 U, and 80 U in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Dynamic Glabellar Lines.

BACKGROUND: OnabotulinumtoxinA 20 U reduces glabellar line (GL) severity at maximum frown for approximately 3 to 4 months. Small studies have suggested that >20-U doses may increase the efficacy and duration of response for GLs. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate safety, pharmacodynamic response, and treatment satisfaction with onabotulinumtoxinA doses ≥20 U for GLs. METHODS: This 48-week, double-blind study compared 40, 60, and 80 U onabotulinumtoxinA vs 20 U and placebo in women with moderate or severe dynamic GLs on the Allergan Facial Wrinkle Scale. The following parameters were evaluated: the percentage of subjects with investigator-assessed ≥1-grade Facial Wrinkle Scale improvement from baseline at maximum frown (responders) at Week 24; the estimated median duration of response; the proportion of mostly/very satisfied responders on the Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire follow-up Items 1 to 5; and treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: The modified intent-to-treat population (N = 226) had a mean age of 48.0 years, with similar baseline GL severity between treatment groups. Week 24 responder rates were 0% for placebo and 16.0%, 32.0%, 30.6%, and 38.5% for onabotulinumtoxinA 20, 40, 60, and 80 U, with significant (P < 0.05) differences for 40 and 80 U vs 20 U. Median duration of response was longer with all higher doses vs 20 U (≥24.0 vs 19.7 weeks; P < 0.05 vs 20 U at Week 24). Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire results indicated high subject satisfaction. The incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events did not exhibit a dose-response effect. CONCLUSIONS: GL treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA doses >20 U demonstrated longer duration of response and higher patient-reported satisfaction vs the on-label 20-U dose with no apparent impact on safety variables.

Subject satisfaction and psychological well-being with escalating abobotulinumtoxinA injection dose for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicate that the efficacy and durability of a single AbobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) treatment for moderate to severe glabellar lines may be enhanced with increasing dose, while safety outcomes remain consistent with those of the licensed dose (50 U). AIMS: Evaluation of subject-reported indicators of treatment efficacy, satisfaction, and psychological well-being with ABO dose escalation. METHODS: A Phase 2, 36-week, multicenter, randomized, dose-ranging, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in adults with moderate to severe glabellar lines. Subjects received a single ABO treatment, dosed at 50, 75, 100, or 125 U, or placebo. Efficacy endpoints comprised subject-assessed improvement in line severity of ≥1-grade from baseline at maximum frown, global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) grade, FACE-Q™ appraisal of lines, psychological well-being and age, and subject satisfaction. RESULTS: The study included 399 subjects (88.2% were female). Respective responder rates (≥1-grade improvement) with ABO 50-125 U doses ranged between 96.3%-100% at Week 4, 65.0%-67.9% at Week 24, and 33.8%-44.4% at Week 36. GAIS responder rate and FACE-Q appraisal of lines showed a similar pattern of change. Satisfaction was high and psychological well-being was improved from Week 4 through Week 36, with natural, youthful, and refreshed appearance reported for all ABO doses. CONCLUSIONS: A single ABO treatment (dosed at 50-125 U) provided significant and sustained improvements in glabellar line severity over durations up to 36 weeks, versus placebo. Treatment satisfaction was high with all doses. Participants reported natural and youthful appearance, alongside improvements in psychological well-being.

Efficacy and Safety of Letibotulinumtoxin A in the Treatment of Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study.

BACKGROUND: Letibotulinumtoxin A (Hugel, Inc., Chuncheon, Republic of Korea and CROMA Pharma, Leobendorf, Austria) is a newly manufactured neurotoxin derived from Clostridium botulinum strain CBFC26. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of letibotulinumtoxin A in reducing glabellar line severity (GLS) and to evaluate long-term safety and efficacy following repeated injections. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled Phase III clinical trial, 355 subjects with moderate to severe glabella frown lines received injections of 20 U of letibotulinumtoxin A or placebo. GLS, onset and duration of effect, time to retreatment, and adverse events were evaluated. Response to treatment was defined as a GLS score of 0 or 1 (assessed by the subject and the investigator) and an improvement at Week 4 of ≥2 points in GLS score relative to baseline. RESULTS: At 4 weeks, 78.6% of the active treatment subjects were responders based on the investigator's assessment and 68.8% based on the subject's assessment, resulting in a composite responder rate of 64.7% for the active treatment group, whereas the corresponding rate was 0.0% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Subjects noted a substantial improvement in GL severity as early as Day 2, with the median time to onset of effect being 3 days. The mean [standard deviation] time until first retreatment for the letibotulinumtoxin A group was 127.26 [65.6] days. Letibotulinumtoxin A was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Letibotulinumtoxin A demonstrates high efficacy and a convincing safety profile in the treatment of glabellar lines.

Safety and Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid Filler, VYC-20L, via Cannula for Cheek Augmentation: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Using cannulas to deliver facial fillers may reduce adverse events (AEs) compared with needle injection. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of VYC-20L (20 mg/mL hyaluronic acid gel with lidocaine) via cannula for midface age-related volume deficit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter, evaluator-blind, randomized, within-subject, controlled study enrolled adults with moderate to severe Mid-Face Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS) scores. VYC-20L was administered in one cheek via cannula (with optional needle use in the zygomaticomalar region) and in the other cheek via needle. The primary effectiveness end point was the mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) paired difference between treatments in MFVDS score change from baseline to Month 1; an upper CI limit of less than 0.5 determined noninferiority. Injection-site responses (ISRs), procedural pain, and AEs were assessed. RESULTS: Of 60 randomized and treated subjects, the mean change in MFVDS score from baseline to Month 1 was -1.8 with cannulas and -1.9 with needles, providing a mean (95% CI) paired difference of 0.1 (-0.05 to 0.25). Most ISRs were mild/moderate and resolved within 2 weeks. Procedural pain was minimal, and no serious AEs were reported. CONCLUSION: VYC-20L for cheek augmentation was safe and effective using a cannula and noninferior to needle injection.

High-Dose Neuromodulators: A Roundtable on Making Sense of the Data in Real-World Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: For aesthetic treatment with botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNTA), interest in maximizing treatment duration and efficacy has prompted study of doses higher than those used in registration studies. As data emerge, it is important that physicians understand how to apply study findings to their own practice so that patient demand is satisfied. OBJECTIVES: To bring together leading experts in neuromodulators for a roundtable discussion on the implications of high-dose BoNTA studies for patient care. METHODS: The authors reviewed and discussed recent data from high-dose BoNTA studies for abobotulinum toxin A, incobotulinum toxin A, and Oonobotulinumtoxin A. RESULTS: Discussion focused on the challenges of data interpretation and extrapolation of study findings for real-world patient care. The authors participated in a candid discussion of whether the observed improvements in treatment duration and patient satisfaction warrant treatment with high-dose regimens delivered as high-concentration injections. Safety was also discussed, as well as economic considerations for both practices and patients. Of note, for BoNTA products, the registration dose, when administered in a smaller total volume, appears to give rise to more durable results than those observed in pivotal trials, implicating product concentration as an important consideration. Importantly, at higher doses, extended duration of effect does not appear to be at the expense of natural-looking results. CONCLUSIONS: While the authors provide considerations for the development of individual clinical practice, there is no one-size-fits-all recommendation. It may be that "high-dose" BoNTA is in reality the optimal dose; however, important economic considerations may prevent rapid uptake for all patients.

AbobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Dose-Escalating, Double-Blind Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of AbobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) dose escalation in the correction of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines. DESIGN: Phase 2, 36-week, multicenter, randomized, dose-ranging, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. METHODS: Adults with moderate-to-severe glabellar lines received a single ABO treatment, dosed at 50, 75, 100, or 125 U, or placebo. Primary endpoint was week 4 composite ≥2-grade responder rate among those achieving a severity score of 0 (none) or 1 (mild) at maximum frown, evaluated using concurrent investigator and subject assessments. Secondary endpoints included ≥1-grade severity improvement, duration of effect, and reporting of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: Overall, 399 subjects were included (88.2% were female). Week 4 composite ≥2-grade ABO responder rate was 80.0% (50 U), 88.8% (75 U), 90.0% (100 U) and 95.1% (125 U), versus 2.6% with placebo (P<0.001). Responder rate (≥1-grade) ranged between 53% (50 U) and 69% (125 U) at week 24 and between 18% (50 U) and 31% (125 U) at week 36. Median time (weeks) to return to baseline severity/worse, among those scoring 0 (none) or 1 (mild), was 32.3 (50 U), 34.3 (75 U), 36.0 (100 U) and 36.6 (125 U), versus 23.7 (placebo). ABO-related TEAEs were reported in 4% of subjects (80% were mild). No seroconversion to ABO neutralizing antibodies was seen. CONCLUSION: A single ABO treatment provided rapid and effective improvements in glabellar line severity at all doses. Higher doses tended to demonstrate elevated response rates and longer duration of effect. All ABO doses were well-tolerated with low TEAE incidence. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(9):980-987. doi:10.36849/JDD.6263.

Botulinum Toxin Type A for Glabellar Frown Lines: What Impact of Higher Doses on Outcomes?

Botulinum toxin serotype-A (BoNT-A) preparations are widely used to improve the appearance of wrinkles. While effective and well tolerated, patients require retreatment over time to re-establish the effects. There is growing interest from patients as to whether higher doses can prolong response without significantly increasing side effects. We reviewed the efficacy and safety evidence for high-dose BoNT-A treatment of glabellar lines, by evaluating high-dose studies published since 2015. Toxins approved for glabellar line treatment in the US or Europe were considered. "High-dose" indicated doses above the licensed dose for each BoNT-A preparation. Five studies met the inclusion criteria and most were randomized, double-blind trials; designs and population sizes varied. Findings suggested that higher-dose BoNT-A treatment is feasible and may improve response duration without increased safety issues. Around 9 months' median duration was achieved with a 2-2.5-fold increase of the abobotulinumtoxinA on-label dose, or with a 5-fold increase in incobotulinumtoxinA dose. A 2-4-fold increase of the onabotulinumtoxinA on-label dose yielded a median duration of around 6 months. Importantly, patient satisfaction and natural look remained with increasing abobotulinumtoxinA doses. While more data are needed, these findings may lead to more effective, individually tailored treatment plans to meet patient expectations.

The Second of Two One-Year, Multicenter, Open-Label, Repeat-Dose, Phase II Safety Studies of PrabotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines in Adult Patients.

BACKGROUND: PrabotulinumtoxinA is a 900-kDa botulinum toxin type A produced by Clostridium botulinum. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to investigate the safety of prabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of glabellar lines. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, repeat-dose, 1-year phase II safety study. Adults with moderate to severe glabellar lines at maximum frown, as independently assessed by both investigator and patient on the validated 4-point photonumeric Glabellar Line Scale (0 = no lines, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe), were enrolled. On day 0, patients received an initial treatment (IT) of 20 U prabotulinumtoxinA (4 U/0.1 mL final vacuum-dried formulation injected into 5 glabellar sites). On and after day 90, patients received a repeat treatment (RT) if their Glabellar Line Scale score was ≥2 at maximum frown by investigator assessment. Safety outcomes were evaluated throughout the study. RESULTS: The 570 study patients received a median total dose of 60 U, that is, 3 treatments. Sixty-one patients (10.7%) experienced adverse events (AEs) assessed as possibly study drug related; 6.5% experienced study drug-related AEs after the IT. With each RT, progressively lower percentages of patients experienced study drug-related AEs. Eight patients (1.4%) experienced study drug-related AEs of special interest: 5 experienced eyelid ptosis (0.9%), 3 eyebrow ptosis (0.5%), 1 blepharospasm (0.2%), and 1 blurred vision (0.2%). Seven patients (1.2%) experienced serious AEs, but none were study drug related. A total of 4060 serum samples were tested for antibotulinum toxin antibodies; no seroconversion was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The safety of RTs of 20 U of prabotulinumtoxinA for moderate to severe glabellar lines was confirmed in this second phase II study based on a broad range of outcomes.

Feasibility Study of Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation and Cryolipolysis for Abdominal Contouring.

BACKGROUND: In addition to reducing subcutaneous fat for body contouring, some patients are interested in toning the underlying muscle layer. OBJECTIVE: This feasibility study evaluated the safety and efficacy of electromagnetic muscle stimulation (EMMS) alone, cryolipolysis alone, and cryolipolysis with EMMS for noninvasive contouring of abdomen. METHODS: Abdomens of 50 subjects were treated in a study with 3 cohorts: EMMS alone, Cryolipolysis alone, and Cryolipolysis + EMMS in combination. Electromagnetic muscle stimulation treatments were delivered in 4 sessions over 2 weeks. Cryolipolysis treatments were delivered in one session. Combination treatments consisted of one cryolipolysis and 4 EMMS visits. Efficacy was assessed by independent physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), circumferential measurement, Subject GAIS (SGAIS), and Body Satisfaction Questionnaire (BSQ). RESULTS: Safety was demonstrated for all study cohorts with no device- or procedure-related adverse events. Independent photo review showed greatest mean GAIS score for the Cryolipolysis + EMMS cohort followed by Cryolipolysis only, then EMMS only cohort. BSQ showed greatest average score increase for Cryolipolysis + EMMS cohort followed by Cryolipolysis only cohort, then EMMS only cohort. Mean circumferential reduction measurements were greatest for Cryolipolysis + EMMS cohort followed by Cryolipolysis only, and then EMMS only cohort. The mean SGAIS improvement score was equal for the Cryolipolysis only and Cryolipolysis + EMMS cohorts, followed by the EMMS only cohort. CONCLUSION: A multimodal approach using cryolipolysis and EMMS was safe and demonstrated enhanced body contouring efficacy for this feasibility study.