Anatomic Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction with and without Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Biomechanical Study.

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine if adding a reconstructed superior acromioclavicular (AC) joint ligament adds significant biomechanical stability to the AC joint over anatomic coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction alone. Methods: Fourteen cadaver shoulders were used for the comparison of biomechanical stability among the anatomic CC ligament reconstruction alone, CC and AC ligament reconstruction, and the intact groups by measuring the displacement under cyclic loads. A load to failure test was then performed in the vertical direction at a loading rate of 2 mm /sec to determine surgical-repair joints' tolerance to the maximum failure load. Results: The average peak-to-peak displacement induced by cyclic load in the sagittal axis and vertical axis direction was not significantly different between CC ligament reconstruction, CC and AC ligament reconstruction, and intact groups. The maximum failure load for the CC reconstruction (224.9 ± 91.8 N (Mean ± SEM)) was lower than CC/AC reconstruction groups (326.2 ± 123.3 N). The CC/AC reconstruction group failed at a significantly higher load (t test, p = 0.016) than the CC reconstruction group. Conclusion: CC/AC reconstruction surgical technique yielded a better shoulder stability than CC ligament alone reconstruction that may better maintain reduction of the AC joint.Level of Evidence: Level II.

Radial Tears of the Lateral Meniscus-Two Novel Repair Techniques: A Biomechanical Study.

BACKGROUND: A common treatment for radial tears of the meniscus has historically been partial meniscectomy. Owing to the poor outcomes associated with partial meniscectomy, repair of the meniscus is an important treatment option. It is important to evaluate different repair techniques for radial tears of the meniscus. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate 2 novel techniques to repair radial tears of the lateral meniscus. The 2 techniques were compared biomechanically with the cross-suture method with an inside-out technique. The authors hypothesized that novel repair techniques would result in less displacement after cyclic loading, increased load required to displace the repair 3 mm, greater load to failure, decreased displacement at load to failure, and increased stiffness of the repair, resulting in a construct that more closely re-creates the function of the intact meniscus. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 36 fresh-frozen cadaveric tibial plateaus containing intact menisci were obtained. The menisci were divided into 3 groups (n = 12 in each group), and each meniscus was repaired simulating an inside-out technique. The 3 repairs completed were the hashtag, crosstag, and cross-suture techniques. Radial tears were created at the midbody of the lateral meniscus and repaired via the 3 techniques. The repaired menisci were attached to an axial loading machine and tested for cyclic and failure loading. RESULTS: After cyclic loading, the cross-suture repair displaced 4.78 ± 1.65 mm; the hashtag, 2.42 ± 1.13 mm; and the crosstag, 3.13 ± 1.77 mm. The hashtag and cross-tag repairs both resulted in significantly less displacement (P = .003 and .024, respectively) as compared with the cross-suture repair. The cross-suture technique had a load to failure of 81.43 ± 14.31 N; the hashtag, 86.08 ± 23.58 N; and the crosstag, 62.50 ± 12.15 N. The cross-suture and hashtag repairs both resulted in a greater load to failure when compared with the crosstag (P = .009 and .009, respectively). There was no difference comparing the load required to displace the cross-suture technique 3 mm versus the hashtag or crosstag technique (P = .564 and .094, respectively). However, when compared with the crosstag technique, the hashtag technique required a significantly greater load to displace the repair 3 mm (P = .015). CONCLUSION: This study introduced 2 novel repair techniques-hashtag and crosstag-that did not demonstrate superiority in terms of load to failure or stiffness, but both repairs were statistically superior to the cross-suture repair in terms of displacement after cyclic loading. Considerations that may influence the validity of these techniques include cost, surgical time, and increased technical demand. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Radial tears of the meniscus are difficult to repair. Further research into more stable constructs is necessary.

Comparison of ACL Strain in the MCL-Deficient and MCL-Reconstructed Knee During Simulated Landing in a Cadaveric Model.

BACKGROUND: Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after valgus landing has been reported and studied biomechanically. However, the role of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) in dissipating these forces has not been fully elucidated. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to investigate the role that the MCL plays in ACL strain during simulated landing. The hypothesis was that ACL strain would increase significantly in MCL-incompetent knees compared with the native knee and that reconstructing the MCL would return the values to those of the intact knee. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were used in this study. A materials testing machine applied a force of 2× body weight over 60 milliseconds to simulate landing after a jump. The knees were tested in 12 loading conditions, consisting of full extension or 15° of flexion combined with 7° of valgus or neutral alignment while the tibia was in external rotation, neutral rotation, or internal rotation. This test procedure was repeated on each specimen with the MCL transected and reconstructed. The superficial and deep MCL was transected along with the posterior oblique ligament, which was thought to simulate a worst case scenario. The MCL was reconstructed by use of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts. RESULTS: During internal rotation at 0° of flexion and 0° of valgus, both the intact ( P = .005) and the reconstructed ( P = .004) MCL states placed significantly lower strain on the ACL than did the transected MCL. The reconstructed MCL state at 0° of flexion and 7° of valgus ( P = .049) along with 15° of flexion and 0° of valgus ( P = .020) also placed significantly lower strain on the ACL than did the transected MCL. For external rotation testing at 0° of flexion and 7° of valgus, the reconstructed MCL state placed significantly lower strain on the ACL than did the transected MCL ( P = .039). Finally, during neutral rotation, the ACL strain at 0° of valgus and 0° of flexion, and at 7° of valgus and 0° of flexion was significantly lower for the MCL-intact groups ( P < .028) and MCL-reconstructed groups ( P < .016) than the MCL-transected groups. CONCLUSION: The current findings demonstrate that during valgus landing, a knee with an incompetent MCL puts the ACL under increased strain. These values are highest in full extension with the tibia in internal and neutral rotation. This increased strain can be reduced to baseline levels with reconstruction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A knee with an incompetent MCL puts the ACL under increased strain. Once the MCL has healed in an elongated manner, MCL reconstruction should be considered.

Biomechanical properties of tenotomy versus biceps knot in a cadaver model.

BACKGROUND: Biceps tenotomy and biceps tenodesis are the primary methods of treating biceps pathology. This study describes a new technique of tenotomy with the goal of autotenodesis to give the biceps a higher load to failure and decreased chance of a Popeye deformity. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the strength of the "biceps knot", which is an outlet tenodesis of the biceps tendon and compare the biomechanical properties of this technique to tenotomy. METHODS: Ten matched cadaver shoulder pairs were used. In the tenotomy group, an arthroscopic tenotomy was performed at the labral biceps junction using a narrow angled biter. For the biceps knot group, a self-retrieving suture passing device was used to pass a suture as far lateral as possible. The suture was passed from just distal to the biceps insertion on the superior labrum and tied with a standard non-sliding arthroscopic knot. The humerus and biceps tendon were rigidly fixed to a materials testing machine and cyclically loaded at 10-20 N for 100 cycles at 1 Hz. After cyclic testing, a 2 N preload was placed on the tendon and the tendon was pulled in line with the bicipital groove until failure. RESULTS: The peak load to failure for the biceps knot was 58.9 N (SEM 8.2 N) and 37.3 N (SEM 4.6 N) for the tenotomy group (p = 0.046). The average stiffness for the biceps knot group was 4.2 N/mm (SEM 0.4 N/mm) and 3.2 N/mm (SEM 0.2 N/mm) for the tenotomy group (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Performing the biceps knot is a quick, easy and cost effective alternative to the current tenodesis options available.

A Biomechanical Comparison of Isometric and Anatomic Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.

The purpose of this study was to compare two different methods of medial patellar femoral ligament (MPFL) reconstructions: isometric and anatomic. These were then compared with the native MPFL. Fourteen fresh frozen cadaveric knees were carefully dissected to expose the MPFL. The patella was laterally translated 10 mm using an Instron and values were recorded for the intact ligament and the reconstructions. Neither the anatomic nor the isometric reconstructions completely restored the biomechanical properties of the intact MPFL. There were fewer differences between the isometric reconstruction and the intact specimens. The higher forces and stiffer constructs that occurred with the anatomic reconstruction may suggest that this reconstruction technique could overconstrain the patellofemoral joint.

Temperature Change When Drilling Near the Distal Femoral Physis in a Skeletally Immature Ovine Model.

BACKGROUND: The possibility of physeal injury during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the pediatric population is a concern. The purpose of this study was to determine whether drilling at or near the physis could cause a temperature increase that could trigger chondrolysis. METHODS: Skeletally immature cadaveric lamb distal femurs were used for this study and randomly placed in 1 of 6 groups (n=10 in each group). We examined the 8 and 10 mm Flipcutter at a distance of 0.5 mm from the physis and an 8 and 10 mm acorn-tipped reamer at a distance of 0.5 and 3.0 mm from the physis. During drilling, temperature change at the distal femoral physis was continuously measured until the temperature decreased to the original value. RESULTS: An interreamer comparison yielded a significant difference when drilling 0.5 mm from the physis (P=0.001). Pair-wise Mann-Whitney post hoc tests were performed to further evaluate the differences among the groups. The 8 mm FlipCutter had a significantly higher maximum temperature (39.8±1.4°C) compared with the 10 mm FlipCutter (38.0±0.6°C, P=0.001), 8 mm acorn-tipped reamer (38.1±0.9°C, P=0.007), and 10 mm acorn-tipped reamer (37.5±0.3°C, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of thermal-induced injury to the physis is low with an all epiphyseal drilling technique, when a traditional acorn-tipped reamer over a guidepin is utilized, even if the drilling occurs very close to the physis. In addition, the risk of drilling with a FlipCutter is low, but may be greater than a traditional reamer. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Thermal-induced necrosis is a realistic concern, due to the characteristics of the distal femoral physis, and the propensity for this physis to respond poorly to injury. Our study supports that drilling near the physis can be done safely, although smaller reamers and nontraditional designs may generate higher heat. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I-basic science.

Medial Femoral Condyle Cartilage Defect Biomechanics: Effect of Obesity, Defect Size, and Cartilage Thickness.

BACKGROUND: Medial femoral condyle (MFC) chondral defects cause knee pain. Clinical studies have shown worse functional outcomes and cartilage defect fill rates after microfracture in obese patients (BMI ≥30) and for defects with size ≥2 cm(2). PURPOSE: To determine the effect of obesity, defect size, and cartilage thickness on the force sustained at the base of full-thickness MFC cartilage defects during weightbearing. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eight human cadaveric knees were loaded in 15° of flexion. A sensor measured force across the medial compartment. The area at the base of the defect protected from load, termed the "area of containment," was quantified, and loads simulating weightbearing for BMIs of 20, 30, and 40 were applied. A full-thickness cartilage defect was created on the MFC. Cycles of loads were applied for defect sizes with diameters of 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, and 20 mm. A second sensor recorded force at the base of the defect for defects with diameters of 14, 16, 18, and 20 mm. RESULTS: Loads simulating BMI ≥30 led to a decrease in the area of containment for all defects ≥14 mm in diameter (P ≤ .038). Base of defect force increased for defects ≥16 mm in diameter (area, ≥2 cm(2)) between loaded and unloaded states (P ≤ .042) and for loads simulating BMI ≥30 (P ≤ .045). Cartilage rim thickness <2 mm showed higher base of defect force than did thickness ≥2 mm, for all BMI groups (P ≤ .025). CONCLUSION: Increased force at the base of MFC cartilage defects was observed for weightbearing loads simulating BMI ≥30, for defect size ≥2 cm(2), and for rim thickness <2 mm. This may lead to a biomechanically unfavorable environment after microfracture in these patient subsets. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These biomechanical findings corroborate clinical studies that have noted worse outcomes after microfracture in patients with BMI ≥30 and cartilage defects of size ≥2 cm(2). Further clinical studies are needed to compare microfracture with other cartilage restoration procedures in these patient subsets.