RESUMO
Introduction: The decision to use circular frame fixation for lower limb trauma, or elective deformity correction, often accompanies the assertion that the patient will be able to fully weight-bear through the limb immediately following surgery. Materials and methods: About 53 patients underwent retrospective review. Included in the study were current attendees of adult specialist physiotherapy, following circular frame application to the lower leg at our Institution between August 2018 and January 2020. Cases with incomplete data, cases given postoperative status of non-weight-bearing, those with physiotherapy follow-up conducted elsewhere, or cases of polytrauma were excluded from the study.Weight-bearing assessment and rehabilitation supervision were at the discretion of the physiotherapy team. The clinical concept of 'full weight-bearing' is poorly defined, but was documented in the context of displaying a stable gait using elbow crutches and subsequently without walking aids. Comparative data was analysed using an unpaired, two-tailed Welch's t-test. Results: Mean postoperative time to full weight-bearing using crutches was 28.3 days (0-159) (n = 40).Mean postoperative time to independent full weight-bearing with no walking aids was 230.6 days (35-393), or 7.1 months (0-12) (n= 34).No significant differences were seen between:Frames for open injuries (n= 5) vs closed injuries (n = 17; p > 0.4).Joint-spanning constructs (n= 18) vs non-spanning constructs (n = 21; p > 0.6), orTreatment of intra-articular injuries (n = 14) vs extra-articular injuries (n = 17; p > 0.2).Interpretation of these results should be made with caution due to sample size. Conclusion: The ability to permit patients to fully weight-bear immediately after surgery is often a distinct advantage of the circular frame over other fixation modalities, for a variety of indications. However, it does not follow that patients are capable of doing so; there is a long dependency on walking aids. This would appear to be the case irrespective of open/closed injuries, intra-/extra-articular injuries, or the use of a spanning construct across the knee or ankle. How to cite this article: Craig A, Barron E, Sharma H, et al. Do Patients Achieve "Full Weight-bearing" Immediately Following Application of Circular Frame Fixation of the Lower Limb? Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(1):40-44.
RESUMO
Use of articular antibiotic-eluting cement spacers during two-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a long-established and proven adjunctive technique during first-stage surgery. Articular spacers come in many forms, either static or dynamic. The authors present an instructional review of current evidence regarding their use. A total of 45 studies (for spacer use in PJI involving either hip or knee) were analysed for data regarding eradication rate, functional outcomes, mechanical complications and the impact on second-stage surgery. A large number of case series and retrospective cohort studies were retrieved, with only a small number of prospective studies (2). High levels of infection eradication were commonly reported (>80%). Outcome scores were commonly reported as indicating good-to-excellent function and pain levels. Second-stage procedures were often not required when dynamic spacers were used. Static spacers were associated with more mechanical complications in both the hip and the knee. In the hip, dynamic spacers were more commonly associated with instability compared to static spacers. Consideration should be given to the use of dual-mobility or constrained definitive acetabular components in these cases at second-stage surgery. The use of antibiotic-eluting polymethylmethacrylate articular spacers in two-stage revision for PJI of hip and knee arthroplasty achieves a high rate of infection eradication. Dynamic spacers may confer a variety of benefits compared to static spacers, with a similar rate of infection eradication.
RESUMO
Parents play an important role in the treatment of their children's symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD); thus, developing effective, efficient, socially acceptable, and accessible procedures for training parents to implement applied-behavior-analysis (ABA) interventions is critically important. One potential approach involves delivering training via a virtual private network (VPN) over the internet (Fisher et al., 2014). In this study, we conducted a randomized clinical trial to evaluate a virtual parent-training program with e-learning modules and scripted role-play via a VPN. We evaluated parent implementation of ABA skills using direct-observation measures in structured-work and play-based training contexts. Parents in the treatment group showed large, statistically significant improvements on all dependent measures; those in the waitlist-control group did not. Parents rated the training as highly socially acceptable. Results add to the growing literature on the efficacy and acceptability of virtually delivered training in ABA.
