[LGBTQIA+ people: care issues in the emergency department]. / Personnes LGBTQIA+ : enjeux de prise en charge aux urgences.

Visits to the emergency department are often a difficult time for LGBTQIA+ people, mainly because of the frequent discrimination in healthcare environments and the lack of knowledge of medical and nursing staff. This article begins by presenting some epidemiological features, before discussing specific issues such as contraception and fertility, hormone therapy, sexually transmitted infections, surgical complications, psychiatric pathologies, and traumatology, from the perspective of the emergency physician. Finally, suggestions for further reflection and improvement are proposed.

Les visites aux urgences représentent souvent des moments difficiles pour les personnes LGBTQIA+, principalement en raison des discriminations particulièrement fréquentes dans les milieux de soins et du manque de connaissances du personnel médico-soignant. Cet article présente dans un premier temps quelques chiffres épidémiologiques, avant de discuter des enjeux spécifiques, comme la contraception et la fertilité, l'hormonothérapie, les infections sexuellement transmissibles, les complications opératoires, les pathologies psychiatriques ou la traumatologie, le tout sous le prisme de l'urgentiste. Enfin, des pistes de réflexion et d'amélioration sont proposées.

Patients leaving the emergency department without being seen by a physician: a retrospective database analysis.

QUESTIONS UNDER STUDY: To describe characteristics of patients leaving the emergency department (ED) before being seen by a physician and to identify factors associated with a greater risk of leaving the ED too early. DESIGN: retrospective database analysis. SETTING: emergency department (ED) of an urban teaching hospital admitting 60,000 patients per year. STUDY SUBJECTS: all patients older than 18 years admitted to the ED over one year. Collected data: patient's and ED visit characteristics. RESULTS: Among the 57,645 patients admitted, we identified 2,413 patients (4.2%) who left without being seen (LWBS). LWBS patients were more likely to be male (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI 95%]: 1.03-1.23), single (OR 1.12, CI 95%: 1.01-1.23), unemployed (OR 1.27, CI 95%: 1.13-1.44), dependent on welfare (OR 1.29, CI 95%: 1.12-1.50) or Muslim (OR 1.19, CI 95%: 1.00-1.42). LWBS patients were also more likely to present with less acute emergency triage levels. As complaints, alcohol and/or other substance abuse (OR 6.08, CI 95%: 5.04-7.34), neurological problems (OR 2.23, CI 95%: 1.88-2.64) or dermatological problems (OR 1.63, CI 95%: 1.37-1.94) were over-represented in this population. Patients admitted at week-ends (OR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.16-1.39) and/or during the night (OR = 2.67, 95% C: 2.35-3.02) also were at higher risk of leaving the ED prematurely. CONCLUSIONS: LWBS patients share some characteristics and a better understanding of these characteristics as well as time and logistic issues could ease to implement strategies to reduce premature leaving from the ED.