Systematic Review of Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Interventional Radiology.

INTRODUCTION: A patient-reported outcome (PRO) is any outcome reported directly by the patient, in contradistinction to a clinician-reported outcomes, which have dominated clinical research. This systematic review evaluates the ways in which PROs have been used in the interventional radiology literature. METHODS: Systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and was designed and conducted by a medical librarian. Studies were screened for inclusion by two independent members, with a third member as a conflict resolver. The data were extracted from each study in a consistent and structured manner. RESULTS: In all, 354 studies met criteria for full-text analysis; 218 of 354 (62%) used a prospective design and most frequently provided level III (249 of 354, 70%) or level I (68 of 354, 19%) evidence. The manner in which PROs were obtained was reported in 125 of 354 (35%) of studies. Questionnaire response rate was documented in 51 of 354 (14%) studies, and questionnaire completion rate was documented in 49 of 354 (14%) studies. Of 354 studies, 281 (79%) studies used at least one independently validated questionnaire. The disease domains most commonly assessed via PRO were women's health (62 of 354, 18%) and men's health (60 of 354, 17%). DISCUSSION: Wider development, validation, and systematic use of PROs in IR would enable more informed patient-centered decision making. A greater focus on PROs in clinical trials would elucidate expected outcomes from the patient's perspective, simplifying comparisons with therapeutic alternatives. To produce more convincing evidence, trials must apply validated PROs rigorously and report possible confounding factors consistently.

The Latest on Lung Ablation.

Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women. Despite smoking cessation efforts and advances in lung cancer detection and treatment, long-term survival remains low. For early-stage primary lung carcinoma, surgical resection offers the best chance of long-term survival; however, only about one-third of patients are surgical candidates. For nonsurgical candidates, minimally invasive percutaneous thermal ablation therapies have become recognized as safe and effective treatment alternatives, including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation. Lung ablation is also an acceptable treatment for limited oligometastatic and oligorecurrent diseases. This article discusses the technologies and techniques available for tumor ablation of thoracic malignancies, as well as new treatments on the horizon.

Prevalence of hypercoagulable states in stented thrombotic iliac vein compression syndrome with comparison of re-intervention and anticoagulation regimens.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy is playing an increasing role in the treatment of iliofemoral venous disease. Iliac stent patency is multifactorial, and current management is based on best clinical practices, varying by institution. AIM: To evaluate how thrombophilia influences management and outcomes of patients who undergo venous stenting for thrombotic iliac vein compression syndromes. METHODS: A retrospective observational analysis was performed on 65 patients with thrombotic iliac vein compression syndrome that underwent common iliac vein (CIV) stenting between December 2013 and December 2019 at a large academic center. Search criteria included CIV stenting and iliac vein compression. Non-thrombotic lesions and iliocaval thrombosis and/or occlusions were excluded. A total of 65 patients were selected for final analysis. Demographic information, procedural data points, and post-procedural management and outcomes were collected. Statistical analyses included Fisher's exact and Chi-square tests to compare discrete variables and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare continuous variables between thrombophilia positive and negative patients. RESULTS: 65 patients underwent successful balloon angioplasty and CIV stenting. Of these patients, 33 (50.8%) underwent thrombophilia testing, with 16 (48.5%) testing positive. Stent patency on ultrasound did not significantly differ between thrombophilia positive and negative patients at 1 mo (92.3% vs 81.3%, P = 0.6), 6 mo (83.3% vs 80%, P > 0.9), or 12 mo (77.8% vs 76.9%, P = 0.8). Immediately after stent placement, thrombophilia patients were more likely to be placed on dual therapy (aspirin and anticoagulation) or triple therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, and anticoagulation) (50% vs 41.2%, P > 0.9), and remain on dual therapy at 6 mo (25% vs 12.5%, P = 0.5) and 12 mo (25% vs 6.7%, P = 0.6). There was no significant difference in re-intervention rates (25% vs 35.3%, P = 0.7) or number of re-interventions (average 2.3 vs 1.3 per patient, P = 0.4) between thrombophilia positive and negative patients. CONCLUSION: Half of patients with stented thrombotic iliac vein compression syndrome and thrombophilia testing were positive. The presence of thrombophilia did not significantly impact stent patency or re-intervention rates.

Misclassification of bicuspid aortic valves is common and varies by imaging modality and patient characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most prevalent adult congenital heart defect. BAV causes lifelong progressive disease that can be prevented by early diagnosis and long-term surveillance, but may be compromised by misclassification of valve morphology. METHODS: The study population was derived from the UTHealth Bicuspid Aortic Valve Registry, which includes serial images on more than 200 participants over a mean follow-up interval of 2.8 years. We abstracted descriptions of aortic valve morphology from transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography reports. We used chi-square and t tests to determine associations between reported valve morphologies (definitely bicuspid, possibly bicuspid, tricuspid, or uncertain) and clinical characteristics and assessed image quality using a validated tool. RESULTS: About 40% of participants were misclassified in at least one imaging report. The mean interval between misclassification and correct diagnosis was 22 months. TEE, MR and CT were more sensitive than TTE and successfully reclassified 20% of participants, but were only used in 14% of patients. Misclassification was associated with age, the extent of valve calcification and image quality, but was not significantly associated with aortic regurgitation, gender, or cusp configuration. CONCLUSION: Misclassification of BAV is prevalent, frequently leads to delayed diagnosis, and is more likely to occur in the most severely affected cases. TEE, CT and MR may increase diagnostic accuracy in up to half of BAV cases but are underutilized. Additional studies are needed to determine if misclassification of BAV patients leads to increased long-term morbidity and mortality.

Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Complications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Gastrointestinal complications are very common in patients undergoing cancer treatment. Some of these complications can be life threatening and require prompt and appropriate diagnosis and treatment. The purpose of this review is to address luminal gastrointestinal and hepatic complications associated with a new class of anticancer drugs, immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), and focuses on the identification, evaluation, and management of the complications associated with this class of drugs. RECENT FINDINGS: It is now recognized that immune checkpoint inhibitors are frequently associated with luminal GI side effects such as diarrhea and enterocolitis and hepatic complications such as hepatitis. While colitis associated with CPIs, to some extent, mimics that found in idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease, the complex interplay of genes, the environment, the immune system, and the microbiome make it difficult to fully differentiate these conditions clinically. CPI-induced hepatitis is most often associated with a pattern of hepatocellular injury with panlobular hepatitis. A variety of biomarkers have been proposed to predict an adverse response to CPIs and are under investigation. It has been proposed that alterations in the microbiome may impact the risk of developing colitis, and these studies are reviewed. In contrast to idiopathic chronic inflammatory bowel disease, CPI-induced colitis is often reversible if rapidly treated in accordance with the immune-mediated adverse reaction management guidelines. Treatment algorithms have been suggested but are, to some extent, empiric and based on algorithms for the treatment of idiopathic inflammatory bowel disorders. CPIs may be associated with significant GI complications which impact their successful use in the treatment of neoplastic diseases. Much of what we currently know about the mechanisms and treatment of these complications is empiric and extrapolated from experience with idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease and other immune disorders. Current research focuses on understanding genetic predisposition and the role of the microbiome and identifying predictive risk markers for developing complications.