Robotic and endoscopic mitral valve repair for degenerative disease.

Background: Minimally invasive mitral valve repair has been proven to be a safe alternative to open sternotomy and may be accomplished through classic endoscopic and robotic endoscopic approaches. Outcomes across different minimally invasive techniques have been insufficiently described. We compare early and late clinical outcomes across matched patients undergoing robotic endoscopic and classic endoscopic repair. Methods: From 2011 to 2020, 786 patients underwent minimally invasive mitral surgery, from which we were able to generate 124 matched patients (62 patients in each cohort). Clinical results were then compared between the two matched populations. Survival analysis was used to compare freedom from mortality to 10 years among matched classic endoscopic and robotic endoscopic mitral valve repair cohorts and to calculate freedom from moderate or severe mitral insufficiency at latest follow-up. Histograms of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp times were constructed, and mean bypass and cross-clamp times were compared between classic endoscopic and robotic endoscopic cohorts. Results: There was no difference in early or late mortality at 10 years in either cohort. Freedom from moderate or severe mitral regurgitation or mitral valve replacement at last echocardiogram was 86.4% vs. 73.5% at 10 years, P=0.97. Patients undergoing robotic endoscopic mitral repair had a significantly longer CPB run when compared to the classic endoscopic cohort, with 148 min of CPB in the robotic endoscopic cohort compared to 133 min in the classic endoscopic group, P=0.03. Overall post-operative length of stay was not statistically significant between the robotic endoscopic and classic endoscopic groups, 6.3±0.5 and 6.0±0.3 days, respectively. No patients in either cohort developed renal failure or wound infection. The classic endoscopic group had a slightly higher risk of prolonged ventilation when compared to the robotic endoscopic group, with three classic endoscopic patients remaining intubated >8 hours post-operatively, compared to a single patient in the robotic endoscopic group. There were no unplanned reoperations in either group. Rates of postoperative stroke were comparable between groups (three in the classic endoscopic cohort, and two in the robotic endoscopic cohort). Conclusions: Index mitral valve surgery via a classic endoscopic approach yields similar clinical outcomes when compared to robotic endoscopic surgery. We demonstrate that both classic endoscopic and robotic endoscopic approaches allow repair of degenerative mitral valves with excellent short- and medium-term outcomes in a tertiary referral center.

Decreasing Readmissions After Ileostomy Creation Through a Perioperative Quality Improvement Program.

BACKGROUND: Readmission after ileostomy creation in patients undergoing colorectal surgery creates a significant burden on health care cost and patient quality of care, with a 30-day readmission rate of 40%. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of our perioperative quality improvement program, Decreasing Readmissions After Ileostomy Creation. DESIGN: Perioperative interventions were administered to patients who underwent ileostomy creation. SETTINGS: A single tertiary care academic center. PATIENTS: Eighty patients participated in this program from February 2020 to January 2021. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were 30-day readmission rates and causes of readmission, which were compared to a historical national database. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the effectiveness of this quality improvement program. RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled in this prospective quality improvement program. The mean age was 52 (±15.06) years. The most common indication for patients undergoing creation of an ileostomy was colorectal cancer (40%; n = 32). The overall 30-day readmission rate was 8.75% (n = 7) throughout the study period, which was significantly lower than historical cohort data (20.10%; p = 0.01). Among the 7 readmitted patients, 3 (3.75%) were readmitted due to dehydration. The most significant associated risk factor for all-cause readmission was urgent/emergent operative status, which was associated with an increased risk of readmission ( p = 0.01). The 3 readmitted patients with dehydration had a mean Dehydration Readmission After Ileostomy Prediction risk score of 11.71 points, compared to 9.59 points in nondehydrated patients, who did not require readmission ( p = 0.38). LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by its small sample size (N = 80). CONCLUSIONS: The Decreasing Readmissions After Ileostomy Creation program has been successful in reducing both the all-cause readmission rate and readmission due to dehydration both within an academic tertiary care referral center and in comparison with historical readmission rates. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B894 . DISMINUCIN DE LA READMISIN DESPUS DE LA CREACIN DE UNA ILEOSTOMA MEDIANTE UN PROGRAMA DE MEJORA DE LA CALIDAD PERIOPERATORIA: ANTECEDENTES:La readmisión después de la creación de una ileostomía en pacientes de cirugía colorrectal crea una carga significativa sobre el costo de la atención médica y la calidad de la atención del paciente, con una tasa de readmisión a los 30 días que llega al 40%.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tiene como objetivo evaluar la implementación de nuestro programa de mejora de la calidad perioperatoria que disminuyen los reingresos después de la creación de ileostomía.DISEÑO:Se administraron intervenciones perioperatorias a pacientes que se sometieron a la creación de una ileostomía.AJUSTE:Se trataba de un único centro académico de atención terciaria.PACIENTES:Participaron 80 pacientes en este programa desde febrero de 2020 hasta enero de 2021.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los principales resultados medidos fueron las tasas de reingreso a los 30 días y las causas de reingreso, que se compararon con una base de datos histórica nacional. Se utilizaron estadísticas descriptivas para evaluar la eficacia de este programa de mejora de la calidad.RESULTADOS:Ochenta pacientes se inscribieron en este programa prospectivo de mejora de la calidad. La edad media fue de 52 (± 15,06) años. La indicación más común para los pacientes que se sometieron a la creación de una ileostomía fue el cáncer colorrectal (40%, n = 32). La tasa general de reingreso a los 30 días fue del 8,75% (n = 7) durante todo el período de estudio, lo que fue significativamente más bajo que los datos históricos de la cohorte (20,10%, p = 0,01). Entre los 7 pacientes readmitidos, tres (3,75%) fueron readmitidos por deshidratación. El factor de riesgo asociado más significativo para la readmisión por todas las causas fue el estado operatorio urgente / emergencia, que se asoció con un mayor riesgo de readmisión (p = 0,01). Los tres pacientes readmitidos con deshidratación tuvieron una puntuación de riesgo promedio de readmisión por deshidratación después de la predicción de ileostomía de 11,71 puntos, en comparación con los pacientes no deshidratados, que no requirieron readmisión (media, 9,59 puntos, p = 0,38).LIMITACIONES:Este estudio está limitado por su pequeño tamaño de muestra (n = 80).CONCLUSIONES:El programa de disminución de las readmisiones después de la creación de una ileostomía ha logrado reducir tanto la tasa de readmisión por todas las causas como la readmisión por deshidratación, tanto dentro de un centro académico de referencia de atención terciaria como en comparación con las tasas históricas de readmisión. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B894 . (Traducción-Dr Yolanda Colorado ).

Long-term Survival After Heart Transplantation: A Population-based Nested Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation is the mainstay of treatment for patients in end-stage heart failure. This study sought to contrast survival after transplantation with that of the general population to quantify standardized mortality rates using a nested case-control study design. METHODS: Control subjects were noninstitutionalized inhabitants of the United States identified through the National Longitudinal Mortality study. Case subjects were adults who underwent heart transplantation between 1990 and 2007 and identified through the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Propensity-matching (5:1, nearest neighbor, caliper = 0.1) was utilized to identify suitable control subjects based on age, sex, race, and state of permanent residency. The primary study endpoint was 10-year survival. RESULTS: In all, 31,883 heart transplant recipients were matched to 159,415 noninstitutionalized residents of the United States. The 10-year survival of heart transplant recipients was 53%. The population expected mortality rate was 15.9 deaths per 100 person-years with an observed rate of 45.1 deaths per 100 person-years (standardized mortality rate [SMR] 2.84; 95% confidence interval, 2.82 to 2.87). The broadest gaps between observed and expected survival were evident in female (SMR 3.63), black (SMR 3.67), and Hispanic (SMR 4.12) recipients. Standardized mortality ratios declined over time (1990 to 1995, 3.09; 1996 to 2000, 2.90; 2001 to 2007, 2.58). The long-term standardized survival of older recipients was closest to that expected for their age. CONCLUSIONS: Heart transplant recipients have considerable long-term survival and have a threefold higher standardized long-term mortality rate than that of the noninstitutionalized population. Long-term mortality rates have consistently declined over time and will likely continue to decrease.

Impact of the New Pulmonary Hypertension Definition on Heart Transplant Outcomes: Expanding the Hemodynamic Risk Profile.

BACKGROUND: At the recent 6th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension (PH), the definition of PH was redefined to include lower pulmonary artery pressures in the setting of elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). However, the relevance of this change to subjects with PH due to left-heart disease as well as the preoperative assessment of heart transplant (HT) recipients is unknown. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried to identify adult recipients who underwent primary HT from 1996 to 2015. Recipients were subdivided into those with mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) < 25 mm Hg and ≥ 25 mm Hg. Exploratory univariable analysis was undertaken to identify candidate risk factors associated with 30-day and 1-year survival (conditional on 30-day survival) in recipients with mPAP < 25 mm Hg, and subsequently, parsimonious multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to assess the independent association with PVR. RESULTS: Over the study period, 32,465 patients underwent HT, including 12,257 (38%) with mPAP < 25 mm Hg. The median age was 55 years (interquartile range, 47-62) and the median PVR was 1.5 Wood units (WU) (interquartile range, 1-2.2) in recipients with mPAP < 25 mm Hg. After controlling for confounders, PVR was independently associated with increased risk for 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.27; P < .01), but not conditional 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.94-1.12; P = .55). PVR ≥ 3 WU was associated with an absolute 1.9% increase in 30-day mortality in those with mPAP < 25 mm Hg, a similar risk to recipients with PVR ≥ 3 WU and mPAP ≥ 25 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated PVR remains associated with a significant increase in the hazard for 30-day mortality after cardiac transplantation, even in the setting of lower pulmonary artery pressures. These data support the validity of the new definition of pulmonary hypertension.

Management of the aortic arch in patients with Loeys-Dietz syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to develop strategies for management of the aortic arch in patients with Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) through a review of our clinical experience with these patients and a comparison with our experience in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). METHODS: We reviewed hospital and follow-up records of 79 patients with LDS and compared them with 256 patients with MFS who served as reference controls. RESULTS: In the LDS group, 16% of patients presented initially with acute aortic dissection (AAD) (67% type A, 33% type B) or developed AAD during follow-up, compared with 10% of patients with MFS (95% type A, 5% type B). There was no difference between patients with LDS or MFS in need for subsequent arch interventions after aortic root surgery (46% vs 50%, P = 1.0). Among the patients who never had AAD, the need for arch repair at initial root surgery was greater in patients with LDS (5% vs 0.4%, P = .04), as was the need for any subsequent aortic surgery (12% vs 1.3%, P = .0004). Late mortality in patients with LDS after arch repair was greater than in those patients who had no arch intervention (33% vs 6%, P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of dissection, patients with LDS have a greater rate of arch intervention after root surgery than patients with MFS. After a dissection, arch reintervention rates are similar in the 2 groups. Arch intervention portends greater late mortality in LDS.

Effects of Systemic and Device-Related Complications in Patients Bridged to Transplantation With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

BACKGROUND: The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) as a bridge to heart transplantation has increased rapidly over the last 2 decades. We aim to explore the effect of pretransplant systemic and device-related complications on posttransplant survival for patients bridged with LVADs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The United Network of Organ Sharing (Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network) database was queried for all adult heart transplant recipients (aged ≥ 18 y) transplanted from April 1, 2015, to June 31, 2018. Device-related complications included thrombosis, device infection, device malfunction, life-threatening arrhythmia, and other device complications. Systemic complications included a new dialysis need or ventilator dependence between the time of listing and transplantation, transfusion, or systemic infection requiring treatment with intravenous antibiotics within 2 wk of transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 2131 patients were identified as requiring LVAD support before transplantation. LVAD patients had high rates of preoperative systemic complications (53%) and high rates of device-related complications (42.7% experienced at least one device-related complication). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly decreased 1-y survival for LVAD patients bridged to transplantation who experienced a pretransplant systemic complication (P = 0.041). Interestingly, preoperative device-related complications had no effect on 1-y posttransplantation survival (P = 0.93). Multivariate Cox modeling revealed that systemic complications were associated with a significantly increased risk of posttransplant mortality for LVAD patients (hazard ratio 1.45; P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Recipients who suffered a systemic complication while awaiting heart transplantation experienced higher short-term mortality rates. Device-related complications do not appear to impact posttransplantation outcomes.

Discrepancies in access and institutional risk tolerance in heart transplantation: A national open cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of center volume on heart transplantation is widely recognized and serves as a benchmark for certification and reimbursement. STUDY AIMS: Study sociodemographic variables associated with access to high-volume centers and substantiate the importance of extending access to underserved populations. METHODS: This study focused on adults undergoing heart transplantation between 2006 and 2015. Centers were clustered into terciles (>25, 14-25, or <14 transplants per year) and factors associated with receiving care in different terciles were identified through multinomial regression. RESULTS: During the study period, 18 725 patients were transplanted at 145 centers. Younger age (<30 years) (P = .005), lower educational level (P < .001), and government-based insurance (P < .001) were associated to lower odds of receiving care at a high-volume center. These centers had higher risk recipients and accepted organs from higher risk donors, when compared to intermediate- and low-volume centers. Receiving care at high (odds ratio [OR], 1.212; P = .017) and intermediate-volume centers (OR, 1.304; P = .001) was associated with greater odds of 1-year survival when compared with low-volume centers. CONCLUSION: Social, demographic, and geographic factors affect access to high- and intermediate-volume centers. High-volume centers tolerate more risk while providing excellent survival. Awareness of this impact should prompt an extension of access to care for underserved patient populations.

Predictors of operative mortality among cardiac surgery patients with prolonged ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged ventilation after cardiac surgery affects survival and increases morbidity. Previous studies have focused on predicting this complication preoperatively; however, indicators of poor outcome in those requiring prolonged ventilation remain ill-defined. We sought to identify predictors of operative mortality in cardiac surgery patients who experience prolonged mechanical ventilation. METHODS: 1698 patients who underwent cardiac surgery (CAB, aortic valve replacement ± CAB, or mitral valve repair/replacement ± CAB) required prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation (>24 hours) between 2012 to 2016 in a statewide consortium. Perioperative factors were evaluated to identify the association with operative mortality. Covariates were selected through bootstrap aggregation to fit multivariable logistic regression models. The relative strength of association was determined by the Wald chi-square statistic. RESULTS: Median patient age was 68 years [IQR 61 to 76], 38% (644/1,698) were female, median duration of mechanical ventilation was 65 hours [IQR 38 to 143], median STS predicted risk of mortality was 3.1% [IQR 1.4 to 6.9%], and 15.7% (266/1698) suffered operative mortality. Among preoperative and operative characteristics, patient age and intraoperative initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were the strongest correlates of operative mortality on the multivariate analysis. Among postoperative factors, cardiac arrest and renal failure requiring dialysis were the strongest predictors of risk-adjusted operative mortality. Type of operation or surgical center had no association to mortality after risk adjustment. CONCLUSION: Prolonged ventilation following cardiac surgery is associated with a five-fold increase in operative mortality. In these patients, operative mortality is associated with older age, intraoperative initiation of ECMO, postoperative cardiac arrest, and renal failure requiring dialysis.

Children's Heart Assessment Tool for Transplantation (CHAT) Score: A Novel Risk Score Predicts Survival After Pediatric Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Given the shortage of donor organs in pediatric heart transplantation (HTx), pretransplant risk stratification may assist in organ allocation and recipient optimization. We sought to construct a scoring system to preoperatively stratify a patient's risk of one-year mortality after HTx. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for pediatric (<18 years) patients undergoing HTx between 2000 and 2016. The population was randomly divided in a 4:1 fashion into derivation and validation cohorts. A multivariable logistic regression model for one-year mortality was constructed within the derivation cohort. Points were then assigned to independent predictors ( P < .05) based on relative odds ratios (ORs). Risk groups were established based on easily applicable, whole-integer score cutoffs. RESULTS: A total of 5,700 patients underwent HTx; one-year mortality was 10.7%. There was a similar distribution of variables between derivation (n = 4,560) and validation (n = 1,140) cohorts. Of the 12 covariates included in the final model, nine were allotted point values. The low-risk (score 0-9), intermediate-risk (10-20), and high-risk (>20) groups had a 5.18%, 10%, and 28% risk of one-year mortality ( P < .001), respectively. Both intermediate-risk (OR = 2.46, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.93-3.15; P < .001) and high-risk (OR = 9.24, 95% CI: 6.92-12.35; P < .001) scores were associated with an increased risk of one-year mortality when compared to the low-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: The Children's Heart Assessment Tool for Transplantation score represents a pediatric-specific, recipient-based system to predict one-year mortality after HTx. Its use could assist providers in identification of patients at highest risk of poor outcomes and may aid in pretransplant optimization of these children.

Comparing Frailty Markers in Predicting Poor Outcomes after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

INTRODUCTION: Frailty is an important component of risk prognostication in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Objective markers of frailty, including sarcopenia, the modified Frailty Index (mFI), and albumin levels, have emerged, but little is known how such markers compare to each other in predicting outcomes after TAVR. We sought to define and compare these markers in predicting long-term outcomes after TAVR. METHODS: Patients who underwent TAVR at our institution from 2011 to 2016 were included. Indexed cross-sectional areas of the lumbosacral muscles on preoperative computed tomography scans were used to assess sarcopenia. Optimal cutoffs for sarcopenia were defined using a statistically validated method. mFI was calculated using an 11-point scale of clinical characteristics. The primary outcome was 2-year all-cause mortality. Adjusted survival analysis was used to analyze outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 381 patients were included in this study. Sarcopenia of the psoas muscles was associated with an increased risk of mortality on univariate (HR: 2.3, P = 0.01) and multivariate (HR: 2.5, P = 0.01) analysis. Sarcopenia of the paravertebral muscles was associated with increased risk of mortality only on univariate analysis (HR: 2.1, P = 0.03). Increased preoperative albumin levels were associated with decreased risk of mortality on univariate (HR: 0.3, P < 0.01) and multivariate analysis (HR: 0.3, P < 0.01). The (mFI) was not associated with mortality on univariate or multivariate analysis. DISCUSSION: Novel cutoffs for sarcopenia of the psoas muscles were determined and associated with decreased survival after TAVR. Sarcopenia and albumin levels may be better tools for risk prediction than mFI in TAVR.

Early Outcomes After Heart Transplantation in Recipients Bridged With a HeartMate 3 Device.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices are increasingly used as bridge-to-transplantation in eligible patients. The HeartMate 3 (HM3; Abbott Laboratories, Abbot Park, IL) is the latest device to obtain US Food and Drug Administration approval as bridge-to-transplantation. This study examines early outcomes of transplant recipients after HM3 in comparison with recipients bridged with the HeartMate 2 (HM2; Abbott Laboratories) and HeartWare Ventricular Assist System (HVAD; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) devices. METHODS: Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database, we identified all adult patients who were slated for bridge-to-transplantation with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (HM2, HVAD, or HM3) between April 1, 2015 and January 31, 2018. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality 6 months after transplantation. The independent influence of the bridging device on outcomes was determined using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Patients (N = 1,978) were successfully bridged to transplantation with the HM2 (n = 881), HVAD (n = 920), or HM3 (n = 177) device. Six-month mortality rates were similar across these devices (HM2, 5.9%; HVAD, 7.7%; HM3, 4.7%; log-rank p = 0.30). On average HM2 patients were on a left ventricular assist device for 2 months longer (p < 0.01). The HVAD had the lowest rate of device exchange before transplant (p = 0.01). The HM3 had no events of pump thrombosis (p < 0.01). HVAD patients had the lowest rate of device malfunction before to transplant (p < 0.01). Panel reactive antibodies at the time of transplantation were lower for HM3 patients (p < 0.01); however rates of graft rejection at 6 months were not different (p = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: The HM3 device provides excellent early outcomes as a bridge to transplantation and may be associated with a reduction in comorbidities. Longer follow-up is needed to better define differences between durable left ventricular assist devices.

Variation in Platelet Transfusion Practices in Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Although the morbidity associated with red blood cell transfusion in cardiac surgery has been well described, the impacts of platelet transfusion are less clearly understood. Given the conflicting results of prior studies, we sought to investigate the impact of platelet transfusion on outcomes after cardiac surgery across institutions in Maryland. METHODS: Using a multiinstitutional statewide database created by the Maryland Cardiac Surgery Quality Initiative, we retrospectively analyzed data from 10,478 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass across 10 centers. Platelet transfusion practices were compared between institutions. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze the association between platelet transfusion and 30-day mortality and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Rates of platelet transfusion varied between institutions from 4.4% to 24.7% ( P < 0.001), a difference that remained statistically significant in propensity score-matched cohorts. Among patients on preoperative antiplatelet therapy, transfusion rates varied from 8.5% to 46.4% ( P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant relationship between case volume and transfusion rates ( P = 0.815). In multivariate logistic regression, platelet transfusion was associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality (OR 2.43, P = 0.008), postoperative pneumonia (OR 2.21, P = 0.004), prolonged intubation (OR 2.05, P < 0.001), and readmission (OR 1.43, P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Significant variation existed in platelet transfusion rates between institutions, even after controlling for various risk factors. This variation may be associated with increased mortality and length of stay. Further study is warranted to better understand risks associated with platelet transfusion. Standardizing practice may help reduce risk and conserve resources.

Impact of Traumatically Brain-Injured Donors on Outcomes After Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplant recipients of traumatically brain-injured (TBI) donors have been reported to have inferior survival and increased rates of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in single-center studies. This study sought to examine the impact of TBI donors on outcomes after heart transplantation across all transplantation centers. METHODS: We identified all adult heart transplants performed during 2007-2016 in the OPTN database. Recipients were dichotomized based on donor cause of death (TBI versus non-TBI), propensity-scored across 22 variables with known associations with mortality, and matched 1:1 without replacement. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were conditional survival and rates of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. RESULTS: In total, 20,244 patients underwent heart transplantation. TBI was the primary cause of death in 53.4% of donors (10,816/20,244), and among TBI donors, blunt injury (59.6%; 6443/10,816) and gunshot wound (35%; 3781/10,816) were the most common mechanisms of injury. Propensity matching generated 6919 pairs (all absolute mean differences < 0.07). Risk-adjusted survival was similar between recipients of TBI donors and non-TBI donors at 5 y (78.1% versus 77.5%, log-rank P = 0.34). Risk-adjusted survival conditional on 1-y survival was also similar at 5 y (86.2% versus 86.1%, log-rank P = 0.74). The 5-y risk-adjusted rates of cardiac allograft vasculopathy did not differ either (30.6% versus 30.4%; log-rank P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: In the largest analysis of TBI donors in heart transplantation, we found similar survival and rates of cardiac allograft vasculopathy to those who received hearts from non-TBI donors out to 5 y. These findings should allay concerns over continued transplantation with this unique donor population.

Size Mismatching Increases Mortality After Lung Transplantation in Preadolescent Patients.

BACKGROUND: The effect of size mismatch between donor and recipient in pediatric lung transplantation (PLTx) is currently unknown. Previous studies in adults have suggested that oversized allografts are associated with improved outcomes after lung transplantation. We investigated this relationship to quantify its effect on posttransplant outcomes in children. METHODS: The United Network of Organ Sharing database was queried for preadolescent (age <13 years) patients undergoing PLTx. Donor-to-recipient height, weight, and predictive total lung capacity (pTLC; ages 4 to 13; pTLC = 0.160 x exp[0.021 x height]) ratios were calculated. Exploratory analysis was performed to identify disjoint intervals at which survival was statistically different. Patients were categorized as well-matched, undersized, or oversized. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression modeling assessed the adjusted effect of mismatching on mortality. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The analysis included 540 children. One-year mortality was higher with a height mismatch of 5% or less (hazard ratio [HR], 2.97; p = 0.001) and above 5% (HR, 2.22; p = 0.009). Similarly, 1-year mortality was worse with weight mismatch of 10% or less (HR, 1.99; p = 0.035) and above 10% (HR, 2.04; p = 0.028). On unadjusted analysis, a pTLC ratio of less than 0.9 was associated with worse survival (p = 0.017). This finding persisted after multivariate risk adjustment (HR, 2.93; p = 0.02). Contrary to findings in adults, an oversized allograft (pTLC ratio > 1.1) was not associated with improved survival (HR, 1.95; p = 0.147). CONCLUSIONS: In preadolescent children undergoing PLTx, size mismatching is associated with increased death. Our findings differ from studies in adults, which demonstrated improved survival associated with oversized allografts. Accordingly, well-matched allografts should be prioritized when assessing donor-recipient pairs for transplantation.

Five-Year Mortality Hazard Is Reduced In Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients Receiving Double- versus Single-Lung Transplants.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest double-lung transplant (DLT) may be associated with superior survival compared to single-lung transplantation (SLT) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recipients. The purpose of this study was to compare survival in patients with COPD undergoing DLT versus SLT since the inception of the lung allocation score. METHODS: We used the United Network for Organ Sharing database to retrospectively identify adult patients with COPD who underwent isolated lung transplantation from 5/4/2005-12/31/2014. We then separated patients into DLT versus SLT. Short-term (1 y) and long-term survival (5 y) were compared between DLT and SLT cohorts by the method of Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to adjust for case mix. RESULTS: Four thousand eight hundred thirty-two COPD patients were listed, and 3554 underwent lung transplantation over the study period, including 1358 SLTs (38%) and 2196 DLTs (62%). Survival 1 y after listing was 93% for those remaining wait listed (n = 1892) versus 91% for SLT (n = 1093) versus 89% for DLT (n = 1847) (log-rank P < 0.01). Survival at 1 y after transplant was 88% for both SLT and DLT groups (log-rank P = 0.93); however, 5-y survival was significantly lower after SLT (51% versus 59%, log-rank P < 0.01). After risk adjustment, hazard for 1-y mortality after DLT was not significantly reduced compared to SLT (hazard ratio 0.89 [0.69-1.14], P = 0.36) but was significantly reduced 5 y after DLT (hazard ratio 0.88 [0.78-0.99], P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In the largest survival analysis of COPD recipients since the inception of the lung allocation score, the hazard for 5-y mortality was significantly reduced in recipients who underwent DLT as compared to SLT.