In Type 1 diabetic patients with good glycaemic control, blood glucose variability is lower during continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion than during multiple daily injections with insulin glargine.

AIMS: The superiority of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) over multiple daily injections (MDI) with glargine is uncertain. In this randomized cross-over study, we compared CSII and MDI with glargine in patients with Type 1 diabetes well controlled with CSII. The primary end-point was glucose variability. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients [38.1 +/- 9.3 years old (mean +/- sd), diabetes duration 16.6 +/- 8.2 years, glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) 7.6 +/- 0.8%], already on CSII for at least 6 months, were randomly assigned to CSII with lispro or MDI with lispro and glargine. After 4 months they were switched to the alternative treatment. During the last month of each treatment blood glucose variability was analysed using glucose standard deviation, mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE), lability index and average daily risk range (ADRR). As secondary end-points we analysed blood glucose profile, HbA(1c), number of episodes of hypo- and hyperglycaemia, lipid profile, free fatty acids (FFA), growth hormone and treatment satisfaction. RESULTS: During CSII, glucose variability was 5-12% lower than during MDI with glargine. The difference was significant only before breakfast considering glucose standard deviation (P = 0.011), significant overall using MAGE (P = 0.016) and lability index (P = 0.005) and not significant using ADRR. Although HbA(1c) was similar during both treatments, during CSII blood glucose levels were significantly lower, hyperglycaemic episodes were fewer, daily insulin dose was less, FFA were lower and treatment satisfaction was greater than during MDI with glargine. The frequency of hypoglycaemic episodes was similar during both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: During CSII, glucose variability is lower, glycaemic control better and treatment satisfaction higher than during MDI with glargine.

Educating diabetic patients about insulin use: changes over time in certainty and correctness of knowledge.

AIM: Diabetic patients should understand their disease correctly and be sure of what they know, but certainty is rarely considered by educators. Furthermore little is known about how certainty changes with time after an educational intervention. To clarify this, in 38 patients with type 1 diabetes (0.3-36 years duration) we analysed the effect of a course on insulin use by administering a questionnaire before the course, after the course and 1 and 3 years later. METHODS: Answers, accompanied by a subjective estimate of the degree of certainty, were assigned to mastered knowledge (certainty>or=90%, correctness>or=90%), hazardous knowledge (certainty>or=90%, correctnessor=90%) and residual knowledge (total-[mastered+hazardous+uncertain]). Answers were then counted and changes in distribution among areas were analysed by the chi2 test. We also followed the fate of wrong answers. RESULTS: The course increased mastered knowledge, while other types of knowledge decreased. With time mastered knowledge decreased, patients losing both correctness and certainty. The loss affected declarative knowledge, based purely on theory, more than procedural knowledge, which concerns the way things are done. Wrong answers, mostly given with high degree of certainty, were heterogeneous since some became correct after the course, some remained wrong, some became wrong after the course, some became mistaken after having been corrected earlier. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of certainty helps in evaluating patient's knowledge; programmes tending to improve procedural knowledge are more likely to have long lasting effects; wrong answers need to be considered on a individual basis.

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in the Veneto region: efficacy, acceptability and quality of life.

AIM: To study the effect of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) on metabolic control and well-being in patients with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Efficacy, safety and interference with everyday life associated with CSII were studied retrospectively in 138 diabetic patients from the Veneto region treated for 7.4 +/- 0.4 years. RESULTS: Glycosylated haemoglobin decreased during the first year of CSII from 9.3 +/- 0.2% to 7.9 +/- 0.1% (P < 0.0001), and then remained unchanged. Serious hypoglycaemia decreased from 0.31 +/- 0.07/year to 0.09 +/- 0.02/year (P < 0.003), as did ketoacidosis (from 0.41 +/- 0.12/year to 0.11 +/- 0.03/year, P < 0.013). During the first year of therapy daily insulin requirement decreased from 49 +/- 1 to 42 +/- 2 U/day (P < 0.0001) and did not change thereafter. The number of out-patient consultations and hospital admissions per year also decreased significantly. CSII was associated with a progressive increase of body weight (P < 0.05) and with 0.2 +/- 0.04 infections/patient per year at the infusion site. Infection was rated as mild in 72%, moderate in 18%, severe in 10%. Patients reported that CSII improved metabolic control (71%), sense of well-being (41%), and allowed more freedom (40%). Quality of life, assessed using the DQOL, after 7 years of CSII was rated as good by patients (score of 73.0 +/- 1.8 on a scale from 0 to 100). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis suggests that CSII improves metabolic control in Type 1 diabetic patients, reduces hypoglycaemic and ketoacidotic events, is well accepted, allows a good quality of life and decreases out-patient consultations and hospital admissions.

Combination of continuous subcutaneous infusion of insulin and octreotide in Type 1 diabetic patients.

The effect of 7 day continuous subcutaneous infusion of octreotide (200 microg day(-1)) was evaluated in seven insulin-pump treated Type 1 diabetic patients (age 43+/-1.5 year; BMI 25.1+/-0.7 kg m(-2); HbA(1c) 7.4+/-0.3%). A 24-h metabolic and hormonal profile, and a euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp (0.25, 0.5, 1.0 mg kg(-1) min(-1)), with [3H]glucose infusion and indirect calorimetry, were performed before and after a 7-day octreotide infusion. Mean 24-h plasma glucose was similar before and after octreotide (9.7+/-0.8 vs. 9.1+/-1.0 mmol l(-1)) but insulin requirement dropped by 45% (49+/-4 vs. 27+/-2 U day(-1); P<0.01). Both 24-h plasma hGH and glucagon were suppressed by octreotide (1.85+/-0.35 vs. 0.52+/-0.04 microg l(-1), and 117+/-23 vs. 102+/-14 ng l(-1), respectively). Glucose utilisation increased after octreotide (insulin 0.5 mU kg(-1) min(-1) clamp 3.09+/-0.23 vs. 4.19+/-0.19 mg kg(-1) min(-1); 1 mU kg(-1) min(-1) clamp 5.64+/-0.61 vs. 7.93+/-0.57 mg kg(-1) min(-1); both P<0.05) and endogenous glucose production was similarly suppressed. Glucose oxidation was not affected by octreotide, while the improvement in glucose storage (insulin 1.0 mU kg(-1) min(-1) clamp 3.89+/-0.60 vs. 5.64+/-0.67 mg kg(-1) min(-1), P<0.05) entirely accounted for the increase in glucose disposal. Endogenous glucose production was more effectively suppressed at the two lower insulin infusion rates (P>0.05). Energy expenditure declined after octreotide. Continuous subcutaneous octreotide infusion suppresses counterregulatory hormones, increases insulin-mediated glucose metabolism by enhancing glucose storage, and reduces energy expenditure. These results support a role for counterregulatory hormones in the genesis of insulin resistance and the catabolic state of Type 1 diabetes.

Teaching and training programme on carbohydrate counting in Type 1 diabetic patients.

Carbohydrates (CHO) are a major determinant of post-prandial blood glucose in the diet of people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus, but patients frequently fail to evaluate CHO food content. Poor education is thought to contribute heavily to this failure. Our aim was to plan and evaluate a simple educational program to improve dietary knowledge and teach how to count CHO in Type 1 diabetic subjects. Forty-eight patients (age 27+/-1 yr, diabetes duration 11+/-1 yr, HbA1c 9%) attended 4 interactive meetings held at monthly intervals. The targets of the course were: 1) to identify sources of CHO, fats and proteins; 2) to count CHO and to split them among meals; 3) to assume CHO-rich foods without changing daily calorie or carbohydrate intake; 4) to modify the diet so as to correct hypoglycaemic events. To evaluate the effect of the course, patients completed a 7-day food record and answered a questionnaire covering the targets of the course at baseline, at the end of the course and 7 months later. After the course dietary knowledge improved significantly. The number of patients who weighed foods, estimated CHO food content and correctly distributed CHO among meals also increased. After the course patients reacted better when faced with hypoglycaemia. The knowledge acquired persisted 7 months after the end of the course. Therefore, we conclude that a simple teaching program can improve diet knowledge in Type 1 diabetics and establish a sustained habit of counting CHO.