Building theoretical insight through joint displays in mixed methods research.

This methodological article expands the conversation about the contribution of joint displays in theoretically driven mixed method research in psychological fields. The author makes a distinction between basic displays that align qualitative and quantitative data or findings side-by-side from more dynamic displays that are used as analytical tools. Highlighting three examples, the article illustrates the contribution of three types of joint displays to advancing theoretical insight: an integrated results display, a theory to design display, and a theory to finding display. The examples featured demonstrate that joint displays can be complex without necessarily being messy. Implications for mixed methods research and practical suggestions for enhancing joint displays are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Challenging procedures used in systematic reviews by promoting a case-based approach to the analysis of qualitative methods in nursing trials.

This methodological discussion invites critical reflection about the procedures used to analyze the contribution of qualitative and mixed methods research to nursing trials by mounting an argument that these should rest on multiple publications produced about a project, rather than a single article. We illustrate the value-added of this approach with findings from a qualitative, cross-case analysis of three critical case exemplars from nursing researchers that each used a qualitative approach with a mixed method phase. The holistic lens afforded by a case-based approach informs nursing inquiry by documenting that the critical case exemplars presented evidence of (a) a sustained commitment of resources and expertise for the qualitative methods that extended across more than one phase of the trial, (b) the impact of the qualitative methods on the trial or its aftermath, (c) deploying a theoretical or conceptual framework for a variety of purposes, and (d) integrating qualitative and quantitative data for purposes of extending explanatory power. Findings challenge the practice of linking purposes served by qualitative and mixed methods to a single trial phase.