[Design and validation of a questionnaire for the detection of major depression in elderly patients]. / Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para la detección de depresión mayor en pacientes ancianos.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to design and validate a scale to detect major depressive disorders in elderly individuals in primary care (Detection of Depression in the Elderly Scale [DDES]). METHODS: We performed an observational and cross-sectional study for the validation of a scale, administered by means of a personal interview, in 259 patients aged 65 years old or older. Available instruments were reviewed and the questions were designed. Subsequently, a first pilot study was performed. In a second pilot study the reproducibility of the instrument was analyzed. The gold standard was the result of a standardized psychiatric interview performed by psychiatrists (DSM-IV criteria and SCAN interviews). RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficients corresponding to the test-retest and inter-rater reliability were 0.858 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.634-0.946) and 0.908 (95% CI, 0.726-0.969) respectively. Two hundred sixteen subjects underwent an assessment, in which primary care and psychiatric evaluations were blinded. Major depression was diagnosed in 81 patients (37.5%; 95% CI, 31.1-44.4). The internal consistency of the DDES was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79). Exploratory factorial analysis revealed an 8-component structure (55.8% of explained variance). A cutoff score of 15 or more for the DDES showed sensitivity of 90.1% (95% CI, 80.95-95.33), specificity of 74.8% (95% CI, 66.48-81.71) and a likelihood ratio (+) of 3.58 (95% CI, 2.65-4.83). CONCLUSIONS: The DDES is a clinically useful instrument for the detection of major depression in elderly patients in primary care.

Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para la detección de depresión mayor en pacientes ancianos / Design and validation of a questionnaire for the detection of major depression in elderly patients

Fundamento y objetivo: Elaborar y validar una escala para detectar trastornos depresivos mayores (TDM) en ancianos que utilizan las consultas de atención primaria (Escala para la Detección de Depresión en Ancianos [EDDA]). Métodos: Estudio observacional transversal para validar una escala, administrada mediante entrevista personal, en 259 pacientes de 65 o más años. Tras revisar los instrumentos disponibles y elaborar los ítems, se realizó una primera prueba piloto o pretest. En una segunda prueba piloto se analizó la reproducibilidad del instrumento. El estándar de oro fue el resultado de una entrevista psiquiátrica estandarizada realizada por psiquiatras (criterios DSM-IV y entrevista SCAN). Resultados: Los coeficientes de correlación intraclase (CCI) correspondientes a la fiabilidad intra e interobservador fueron, respectivamente, de 0,858 (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 0,634-0,946) y 0,908 (IC del 95%, 0,726-0,969). El número de sujetos válidos para el estudio fue de 216 ancianos, en quienes se realizó, de forma ciega, una valoración en consultas de atención primaria y de psiquiatría. En éstas se objetivó la existencia de un TDM en 81 de ellos (37,5%; IC del 95%, 31,1-44,4). La EDDA mostró una elevada coherencia interna (* de Cronbach = 0,79). El análisis factorial determinó que existían 8 factores capaces de explicar el 55,8% de la varianza total. Para una puntuación mayor o igual a 15, la EDDA presenta una sensibilidad del 90,1% (IC del 95%, 80,95-95,33), una especificidad del 74,8% (IC del 95%, 66,48-81,71) y un cociente de probabilidad positivo de 3,58 (IC del 95%, 2,65-4,83). Conclusiones: La EDDA es un instrumento clínicamente útil para la detectar los TDM de los ancianos en la atención primaria

Background and objective: The aim of this study was to design and validate a scale to detect major depressive disorders in elderly individuals in primary care (Detection of Depression in the Elderly Scale [DDES]). Methods: We performed an observational and cross-sectional study for the validation of a scale, administered by means of a personal interview, in 259 patients aged 65 years old or older. Available instruments were reviewed and the questions were designed. Subsequently, a first pilot study was performed. In a second pilot study the reproducibility of the instrument was analyzed. The gold standard was the result of a standardized psychiatric interview performed by psychiatrists (DSM-IV criteria and SCAN interviews). Results: The intraclass correlation coefficients corresponding to the test-retest and inter-rater reliability were 0.858 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.634-0.946) and 0.908 (95% CI, 0.726-0.969) respectively. Two hundred sixteen subjects underwent an assessment, in which primary care and psychiatric evaluations were blinded. Major depression was diagnosed in 81 patients (37.5%; 95% CI, 31.1-44.4). The internal consistency of the DDES was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79). Exploratory factorial analysis revealed an 8-component structure (55.8% of explained variance). A cutoff score of 15 or more for the DDES showed sensitivity of 90.1% (95% CI, 80.95-95.33), specificity of 74.8% (95% CI, 66.48-81.71) and a likelihood ratio (+) of 3.58 (95% CI, 2.65-4.83). Conclusions: The DDES is a clinically useful instrument for the detection of major depression in elderly patients in primary care