The Association Between Plasma Amyloid-ß 42/40 and Percentage of Semantic Intrusion Errors in Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Background: Semantic intrusion errors (SIEs) are both sensitive and specific to PET amyloid-ß (Aß) burden in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). Objective: Plasma Aß biomarkers including the Aß42/40 ratio using mass spectrometry are expected to become increasingly valuable in clinical settings. Plasma biomarkers are more clinically informative if linked to cognitive deficits that are salient to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: This study included 119 older adults enrolled in the 1Florida Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC), 45 aMCI participants scored below the established Aß42/40 ratio cut-off of 0.160 using the Quest AD-Detect™ assay indicating Aß positivity (Aß+), while 50 aMCI participants scored above this cut-off indicating Aß negative status (Aß-). Additionally, 24 cognitively unimpaired (CU) persons scored above the cut-off of 0.160 (Aß-). Results: The aMCI plasma Aß+ group evidenced the greatest percentage of SIEs, followed by the aMCI Aß-. The CU Aß- group exhibited the lowest percentage of SIEs. After adjustment for global cognitive impairment, aMCI plasma Aß+ continued to demonstrate greater SIEs on tests tapping the failure to recover from proactive semantic interference (frPSI) as compared to the aMCI Aß-group. Using pre-established cut-offs for frPSI impairment, 8.3% of CU Aß- participants evidenced deficits, compared to 37.8% of aMCI Aß-, and 74.0% of aMCI Aß+. Conclusions: SIEs reflecting frPSI were associated with aMCI Aß+ status based on the Aß42/40 ratio. Results suggest the importance of SIEs as salient cognitive markers that map onto underlying AD pathology in the blood.

The computerized LASSI-BC Test versus the Standard LASSI-L Paper-and-Pencil Version in Community-Based-Samples.

Proactive Semantic Interference (PSI) and failure to recover from PSI (frPSI), are novel constructs assessed by the LASSI-L. These measures are sensitive to cognitive changes in early Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and preclinical AD determined by Aß load using PET. The goal of this study was to compare a new computerized version of the LASSI-L (LASSI-Brief Computerized) to the standard paper-and-pencil version of the test. In this study, we examined 110 cognitively unimpaired (CU) older adults and 79 with amnestic MCI (aMCI) who were administered the paper-and-pencil form of the LASSI-L. Their performance was compared with 62 CU older adults and 52 aMCI participants examined using the LASSI-BC. After adjustment for covariates (degree of initial learning, sex, education, and language of evaluation) both the standard and computerized versions distinguished between aMCI and CU participants. The performance of CU and aMCI groups using either form was relatively commensurate. Importantly, an optimal combination of Cued B2 recall and Cued B1 intrusions on the LASSI-BC yielded an area under the ROC curve of .927, a sensitivity of 92.3% and specificity of 88.1%, relative to an area under the ROC curve of .815, a sensitivity of 72.5%, and a specificity of 79.1% obtained for the paper-and-pencil LASSI-L. Overall, the LASSI-BC was comparable, and in some ways, superior to the paper-and-pencil LASSI-L. Advantages of the LASSI-BC include a more standardized administration, suitability for remote assessment, and an automated scoring mechanism that can be verified by a built-in audio recording of responses.