RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The synergistic interactions between pharmacotherapy and pulmonary rehabilitation has been provided, but it remains to be established whether this may also apply to more severe patients. OBJECTIVES: We have examined whether tiotropium enhances the effects of exercise training in patients with advanced COPD (FEV(1)=60% predicted, hypoxemia at rest corrected with oxygen supplementation, and limitations of physical activity). METHODS: We enrolled 22 patients that were randomised to tiotropium 18mug or placebo inhalation capsules taken once daily. Both groups (11 patients in each group) underwent an in patient pulmonary rehabilitation program and were under regular treatment with salmeterol/fluticasone twice daily. Each rehabilitation session was held 5 days per week (3h/day) for a total of 4 weeks. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, tiotropium had larger impact on pulmonary function (FEV(1)+0.164L, FVC +0.112L, RV -0.544L after tiotropium, FEV(1)+0.084L, FVC -0.039L, RV -0.036L after placebo). The addition of tiotropium allowed a longer distance walked in 6min (82.3m vs. 67.7m after placebo) and reduced dyspnoea (Borg score) (-0.4 vs. +0.18 after placebo) when compared with baseline (pre pulmonary rehabilitation program). The changes in SGRQ from baseline to the end of treatment were: total score -28.3U, activity -27.8U, impact -14.5U, and symptoms -33.4U in the placebo group; and total score -19.1U, activity -18.9U, impact -16.4U, and symptoms -33.8U in the tiotropium group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study clearly indicates that there is an advantage in combining pulmonary rehabilitation with an aggressive drug therapy in more severe patients.
Assuntos
Albuterol/análogos & derivados , Androstadienos/administração & dosagem , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Dispneia/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Derivados da Escopolamina/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Albuterol/administração & dosagem , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Esquema de Medicação , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Dispneia/fisiopatologia , Dispneia/reabilitação , Tolerância ao Exercício/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Fluticasona , Humanos , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/reabilitação , Xinafoato de Salmeterol , Brometo de Tiotrópio , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Most outcomes do not deeply express the degree of disability in patients with respiratory failure (RF) following inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (IPR). The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of an IPR in patients with confirmed COPD and RF using functional independence measure (FIM) that determines the degree of disability experienced by patients and the progress they make during rehabilitation. This scale includes several items: self care, mobility, locomotion, communication and social recognition. Twenty-two patients (age 70+/-2 years, PO(2) 58.18+/-7.63mmHg, PCO(2) 46.82+/-9.11mmHg) were prospectively observed and studied. IPR included respiratory and peripheral muscle training, mucus evacuation techniques, and energy conservation techniques. FIM, Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale (MRC), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and 6-min walking distance (6-MWD) were assessed on admission (pre) and discharge (post) from IPR. After IPR there was a statistically significant improvement (p<0.01) in all the FIM items (total score in self care, mobility, locomotion, social recognition) except for communication. Changes of MRC (pre 4.32+/-0.84; post 3.00+/-1.15, p<0.001), SGRQ (%) (pre 69.86+/-4.62; post 46.50+/-11.94, p<0.001), and 6-MWD (pre 164.54+/-98.63; post 214.32+/-97.64, p<0.001) paralleled those improvements. An inverse correlation between MRC and FIM (r=-0.5042, p=0.016) was observed. Our preliminary study has shown that the benefits of IPR in COPD with RF do not only translate in dyspnoea, exercise capacity and quality of life but also within neuromotor disabilities as assessed by FIM. Our results warrant future studies in pulmonary rehabilitation using FIM as an outcome measure.
Assuntos
Avaliação da Deficiência , Insuficiência Respiratória/reabilitação , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comunicação , Dispneia/reabilitação , Tolerância ao Exercício , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/reabilitação , Qualidade de Vida , Insuficiência Respiratória/psicologia , Autocuidado , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Incontinência UrináriaRESUMO
Exercise tolerance is an important outcome measure in patients with COPD, mostly because there is evidence that exercise testing is superior to other functional measurements obtained at rest in demonstrating the positive effect of a specific intervention. We assessed the effect of a 5-day treatment with formoterol 12 microg twice daily on lung function, exercise capacity and dyspnea in 22 stable COPD patients, and compared 6-MWT with 12-MWT in evaluating formoterol efficacy. All subjects entered a crossover design. They underwent 6-MWT or 12-MWT in a randomised order and soon after started the 5-day treatment. After a 3-day washout, patients who had first performed 6-MWT, underwent 12-MWT, and the contrary. Formoterol induced a progressively significant increase in pre-drug FEV1 and IC and also significant changes in these parameters 2 h after its inhalation at each test day. Moreover, it increased the walked distance by 53.6 m at the end of 6-MWT and 59.9 m at the end of 12-MWT. Formoterol also induced a significant change in Borg score for dyspnea caused by the 6-MWT when compared with the pre-treatment values, whereas it significantly changed dyspnea induced by 12-MWT only after the first dose. Our study not only strengthens the importance of walking tests as a useful tool for evaluating the impact of a bronchodilator on some COPD patient-centred outcomes, but also indicates that 6-MWT seems to be a more appropriate instrument than 12-MWT for assessing the exercise response to a bronchodilator in COPD.
Assuntos
Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Etanolaminas/uso terapêutico , Teste de Esforço/métodos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Cross-Over , Tolerância ao Exercício/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado/efeitos dos fármacos , Fumarato de Formoterol , Humanos , Capacidade Inspiratória/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Resultado do Tratamento , CaminhadaRESUMO
Smoking is associated with an increased risk of respiratory tract infection in adults likely because components in the smoke might alter properties of the epithelial cell surface. In studies with smokers suffering from acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD), the most common bacterial pathogens found were mainly Haemophilus influenzae, but also Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Therefore, antibiotics should be effective against such possible pathogens. Prulifloxacin has demonstrated in vitro activity against all these pathogens. We designed the present study to evaluate the efficacy of prulifloxacin in the treatment of AECOPD in cigarette smokers. We enrolled 61 consecutive smokers hospitalized or out-patients of either sex with symptoms and signs compatible with the usual diagnosis criteria for AECOPD. Haemophilus influenzae was the most common bacterial species isolated in the sputum (in 42.6% of the total sample), followed by S. pneumoniae (16.5%), S. aureus (14.7%), M. catarrhalis (11.5%), and others (14.7%). Prulifloxacin 600 mg was given orally once daily for 10 days. Clinical success was observed in 91.8% of patients (67.2% cured and 24.6% improved). Bacteriological eradication rate of H. influenzae was 100%. Persistent pathogens were S. pneumoniae (2 out of 10), S. aureus (1 out of 8), M. catarrhalis (1 out of 7), and P. aeruginosa (1 out of 3). This study seems to indicate that prulifloxacin is of particular value in the treatment of AECOPD in cigarette smokers.