Screening for Osteoporosis Risk Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Due to potential health-related consequences of osteoporosis (OP), health care providers who do not order imaging, such as physical therapists, should be aware of OP screening tools that identify individuals who need medical and rehabilitation care. However, current knowledge and guidance on screening tools is limited. Therefore, we explored OP screening tools that are appropriate and feasible for physical therapy practice, and evaluated tools' effectiveness by examining their clinimetric properties. METHODS: A systematic search of the following databases was performed: PubMed, PEDro, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Articles were included if the study population was 50 years and older, had a diagnosis of OP, if the screening tool was within the scope of physical therapy practice, and was compared to either a known diagnosis of OP or bone densitometry scan results. Included articles underwent multiple reviews for inclusion and exclusion, with each review round having a different randomly selected pair of reviewers. Data were extracted from included articles for participant demographics, outcome measures, cut-off values, and clinimetric properties. Results were categorized with positive and negative likelihood ratios (+LR/-LR) based on the magnitude of change in the probability of having or not having OP. RESULTS: +LRs ranged from 0.15 to 20.21, with the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) and Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) having a large shift in posttest probability. -LRs ranged from 0.03 to 1.00, with the FRAX, Male Osteoporosis Risk Estimation Scores, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool (OST), and Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation having a large shift in posttest probability. CONCLUSION: Tools with moderate-large shift for both +LR and -LR recommended for use are: (1) OST; (2) FRAX; and (3) SOF. The variability in cut-off scores and clinimetric properties based on gender, age, and race/ethnicities made it impossible to provide one specific recommendation for an OP screening tool. Future research should focus on OP risk prediction among males and racial and ethnic groups.

Reliability, responsiveness, and validity of slow walking speed in community dwelling older adults.

BACKGROUND: Independent ambulation requires adaptability. Self-selected and maximum walking speeds are often both assessed to demonstrate the ability to adapt speed to different tasks and environments. However, purposefully walking at a slow speed (slowWS) could also be an appropriate adaptation in certain situations but has rarely been investigated. RESEARCH QUESTION: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability, responsiveness, and concurrent validity of slowWS in community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: This was an observational, cross-sectional study of 110 community-dwelling older adults. Test-retest and inter-rater reliabilities of slowWS were assessed with intra-class correlation coefficients. Standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC95) were calculated to determine responsiveness. Concurrent validity was assessed with Spearman rank-order correlations between slowWS and a battery of tests previously shown to be related to walking speed. RESULTS: Walking speed measurement for slowWS was shown to have excellent test-retest and interrater reliability (ICCs values of 0.971-0.997). Standard error of measurement value was small (0.015 m/sec) and MDC95 was 0.04 m/sec. SlowWS was not found to significantly correlate to any other study variable. SIGNIFICANCE: Walking speed, whether self-selected, maximum, or slow, can be measured reliably with a stopwatch and specific verbal commands. While slowWS could be beneficial for certain tasks or environments, walking slowly was not associated with age, sex, comorbidity, or measures of cognition, depression, strength, balance, disability, or life-space in this sample.

Examining physical activity participation barriers among adults 50 years and older: a scoping review.

Background: Addressing physical activity (PA) barriers is essential for increasing PA levels in middle-aged and older adults. However, there are no recommendations on selecting PA barrier assessment tools. Objectives: Thus, we aimed to identify and provide clinimetric properties on PA barrier assessment tools that healthcare providers, exercise experts, and public health officials can use to examine potential barriers faced by community-dwelling adults 50 years and older. Methods: We performed a systematic search of the following databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Articles were included if they presented clinimetric data on a PA participation barrier assessment tool for community-dwelling participants with a mean age of 50 years and older. The 561 identified articles underwent multiple rounds of blinded reviews. Included articles underwent data extraction for participant characteristics, scoring, constructs, reference tests, and clinimetric properties. Results: The 35 included articles reported on 33 different PA participation barrier assessment tools. Eighteen articles reported on participants with cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, or neurological diagnoses, diabetes, hemodialysis, history of cancer, or mobility limitations. Tools with two or more supporting publications included the Exercise Benefits/Barrier Scale (EBBS), Episode-Specific Interpretations of Exercise Inventory (ESIE), and Inventory of Physical Activity and Barriers (IPAB). Due to differences in methodologies, across-tool comparison was not possible. Conclusion: The EBBS, ESIE, and IPAB are promising tools for community-dwelling adults 50 years and older. However, additional research is warranted to identify the best PA barrier assessment tool among adults 50 years and older.

Wellness Aging Model Related to Inactivity, Illness, and Injury (WAMI-3): A Tool to Encourage Prevention in Practice.

It is a steep challenge to fully implement the wide range of evidence that supports rehabilitation interventions for the prevention of chronic disease. Proactive physical activity (PA) promotion can lead to increased PA levels to improve and maintain physical function. Higher levels of PA throughout the lifespan lead to better overall population health, wellness, aging, disease prevention, and chronic condition management. This article introduces the Wellness Aging Model related to Inactivity, Illness, and Injury (WAMI-3) as a simple visual tool to educate patients on the importance of PA and exercise for primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention. As a clinical construct, the WAMI-3 can be applied to all body systems affected by aging, inactivity, illness, and/or injury and exemplifies the concept of Exercise is Medicine®. The WAMI-3 framework is intended for easy integration into clinical practice; a clinician-friendly resource, based on health promotion, is provided to serve as a catalyst for enhancing the patient interview and education on the importance of PA and exercise. Video Abstract available: For more insight from the authors, see Supplemental Digital Content 1 (available at: http://links.lww.com/JGPT/A115).

APTA Geriatrics' Guiding Principles for Best Practices in Geriatric Physical Therapy: An Executive Summary.

Geriatric physical therapy requires a unique skill set and knowledge to provide best practice care. The skill set requires clinicians to recognize the significance of the continuum of aging from optimal to pathology-influenced aging and how psychosocial, environmental, behavioral, accessibility, and economic factors affect this aging continuum, optimal health, and wellness. Employing this distinctive skill set while also utilizing evidence-based practice, acknowledging the variability observed in older adults, and utilizing interwoven care systems that impact outcomes are key characteristics of best practice. The Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy developed best practice guidelines consisting of 6 principles needed to ensure patients receive the care that they deserve. Best practice principles include person-centered care, anti-ageist beliefs, holistic assessment using sound outcome measures, evidence-based interventions, physical activity promotion, and interprofessional collaborative practice. This executive summary presents these principles along with suggested action steps for each element of best practice. The aims are to encourage individual self-assessment, promote improvement in practice on an individual and facility/system level, increase communication and collaboration with other health care providers about global best practices for older adults, and to further target education, resources, and advocacy toward achieving best practice on a larger scale.

Examining physical activity participation barriers among adults 50 years and older: a scoping review protocol.

Background: Despite the benefits of physical activity (PA), 61% of adults 50 years and older do not meet the recommended levels of PA. One method of increasing PA participation is assessing and addressing PA participation barriers. Currently, no guidance on methodologies for assessing PA participation barriers exist. Objective: The primary objective of this scoping review is to map the methodologies used to examine potential PA participation barriers faced by community-dwelling adults 50 years and older. A secondary objective is to evaluate the clinimetric properties of these methodologies. Methods: This scoping review protocol is registered with Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/wd2hx). A systematic search of the following databases will be performed: PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PEDro. Included studies will 1) present either a) data on development or clinimetric properties of PA participation barrier tool (s); or b) relative risk or odds ratios of PA participation barrier(s); 2) compare PA participation barriers or PA participation barrier tool(s) to either subjective or objective measures of PA; and 3) comprise of community-dwelling participants with a mean age of 50 years and older. A two-phase blinded independent screening process will be conducted to select the included publications. Data will be extracted using a standardized form and cross-checked by the first author. A narrative summary will accompany the results presented in tables and figures. Conclusion: This scoping review will provide a comprehensive understanding of current literature and gaps related to PA participation barrier methodologies used with adults 50 years and older.