Factors predicting health-related quality of life following necrotizing fasciitis.

BACKGROUND: Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a debilitating soft tissue infection that results in disfiguring scars and often amputations. While mortality rates have improved, long-term outcomes in survivors of NF are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to analyze the impact of NF on survivors' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) influenced by age, sex, comorbidities, %TBSA, and confidence with appearance. METHODS: We surveyed 56 adult patients with NF treated at either of two regional referral centers in Manitoba, Canada, between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2014. Necrotizing soft tissue infections involving the fascial planes were identified during surgical debridement. HRQoL was measured by the Medical Outcomes Short Form-36. Derriford Appearance Scale-24, age, sex, comorbidities, and %TBSA were recorded, and group comparisons and stepwise regression models were developed for the mental and physical component scores separately. RESULTS: Mean Mental Component Score (MCS) was 44.5 ± 14.3 and mean Physical Component Score (PCS) was 36.5 ± 11.5; both means were lower than the Canadian population norm of 50. Although stepwise linear regression analyses with block entry indicated influence from age, sex, and comorbid conditions for the MCS and PCS, the only factors that were statistically significant in the final models were confidence with appearance for the MCS and %TBSA for the PCS. CONCLUSIONS: NF has long-term impact on mental and physical health-related quality of life. Distress regarding confidence with appearance affects mental quality of life, whereas the size of the injured area impacted physical quality of life. These findings can help guide targeted interventions that could potentially improve recovery from NF.

Evaluation of a multidisciplinary burn care journal club: Lessons learned.

BACKGROUND: Journal clubs allow discussion of the quality and findings of recent publications. However, journal clubs have not historically been multidisciplinary. Burn care is recognized as a true collaborative care model, including regular multidisciplinary rounds. Since 2011 we have offered a multidisciplinary burn journal club at our institution. We present an evaluation of the factors that have made the sessions successful to facilitate others to commence their own club. METHODS: At the end of each journal club session participants anonymously completed a structured evaluation. Five-point scales were used to evaluate understanding, meeting objectives, presentation and appropriateness of information. Qualitative questions were asked to identify beneficial factors, suggestions for improvements, ideas for future sessions and feedback for the facilitator. RESULTS: Attendance grew from six to a maximum of 19. Members included physicians, nurses, dieticians, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, social workers, basic scientists and students. Presentations were undertaken by all of these disciplines. Ratings improved steadily over time. Understanding increased from a score of 4.5 to 4.8; meeting objectives from 4 to 4.9; satisfaction with method of presentation from 4.3 to 4.9 and with level of information from 3 to 4.9. CONCLUSIONS: Over time, the journal club has evolved to better meet the needs of our team. Successful multidisciplinary journal club implementation requires identification of champions and ongoing evaluation. APPLICABILITY OF RESEARCH TO PRACTICE: The success of the journal club has been possible through the engagement of the entire burn team. Champions within each discipline, facilitated discussion and evaluation tools have helped nurture a nonthreatening team based learning environment.