Cytomegalovirus Immunity Assays Predict Viremia but not Replication Within the Lung Allograft.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection causes significant morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients. Current guidelines use pretransplant donor and recipient CMV serostatus to predict the risk of subsequent CMV replication and length of antiviral prophylaxis. Immunological monitoring may better inform the risk of CMV infection in patients, thereby allowing for improved tailoring of antiviral prophylaxis. In this study, we compared 2 commercially available assays, the QuantiFERON-CMV (QFN-CMV) and T-Track-CMV (enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay), to predict the risk of CMV disease in lung transplant recipients. Methods: We performed CMV immunity assays on 32 lung transplant recipients at risk of CMV disease as defined by serostatus (CMV-seropositive recipients, n = 26; or CMV-seronegative lung transplant recipient receiving a CMV-seropositive donor organ, n = 6). QFN-CMV and T-Track were performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and episodes of CMV replication in both serum and bronchoalveolar lavage were found to be correlated to the CMV immune assays. The predictive ability of the assays was determined using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: There was a degree of concordance between tests, with 44% of recipients positive for both tests and 28% negative for both tests; however, test results were discordant in 28% of cases. A negative result in either the QFN-CMV (P < 0.01) or T-Track (P < 0.05) assays was obtained in a significantly higher number of recipients who experienced CMV replication in the blood. Using these assays together gave higher predictability of CMV replication, with only 1 recipient experiencing CMV replication in the blood who obtained a positive test result for both assays. Neither assay was able to predict recipients who experienced CMV replication in the lung allograft. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that CMV immunity assays can predict viremia; however, the lack of association with allograft infection suggests that CMV-specific T-cell immunity in the circulation is not associated with the control of CMV replication within the transplanted lung allograft.

Real-world experience of Quantiferon-CMV directed prophylaxis in lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The Quantiferon-Cytomegalovirus (QF-CMV) assay was introduced to predict CMV infection and inform prophylaxis duration in our lung transplant recipients (LTR) from 2012. The aims of this retrospective cohort study were to review our QF-CMV experience, understand factors associated with positive results and further explore its predictive utility. METHODS: LTR with QF-CMV testing performed at 5 months post-transplant were included. Patients receiving QF-directed prophylaxis (5 or 11 months) were compared to those receiving our prior standard of care (5 months). Outcomes were CMV infection >1,000 IU/mL in blood and/or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Factors associated with positive QF-CMV results were identified. Patients were compared based on serostatus, QF-CMV results and prophylaxis duration. RESULTS: Our cohort included 263 LTR (59 D+/R-, 204 R+). QF-directed prophylaxis was used in 195 of 263 (74%) and was associated with reduced CMV infection (84/195, 43% vs 41/68, 60%, p < .001). Patients receiving extended prophylaxis experienced less CMV if negative and/or indeterminate (43% vs 70%, p < .01) or positive (10% vs 51%, p < .01). Only 5 of 59 (8%) D+/R- patients were QF-CMV positive compared to 155 of 204 (76%) R+ patients (adjusted OR 0.03, 0.01-0.07, p < .001). After controlling for prophylaxis duration, only D+/R- serostatus remained independently associated with CMV infection (adjusted HR 4.90, 95% CI 2.68-9.00, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: QF-CMV results were strongly correlated with serostatus, with D+/R- patients unlikely to test positive while receiving prophylaxis. Extended prophylaxis was associated with delayed onset, reduced frequency and severity of CMV infection across all subgroups. After accounting for serostatus, the incremental predictive value of QF-CMV in this cohort was limited.

Evaluation of Quantiferon®-Monitor as a biomarker of immunosuppression and predictor of infection in lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing immunosuppression in lung transplant recipients (LTR) is crucially important in minimizing the risk of infection and rejection. Quantiferon®-Monitor (QFM) is a candidate immune function biomarker which has not yet been rigorously evaluated in the lung transplant setting. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to explore relationships between QFM results, immunosuppression, and infection/rejection in LTR. METHODS: QFM, which measures interferon-γ after stimulation with innate and adaptive immune antigens, was tested before and at 2, 6, 12, 24 and 52 weeks post-transplant. Immunosuppression relationships were assessed with linear mixed effects models. Clinical outcomes were analyzed based on the preceding QFM result. RESULTS: Eighty LTR were included. Median pre-transplant QFM levels were 171 IU/mL (IQR 45-461), decreasing to 3 IU/mL (IQR 1-8) at 2 weeks post-transplant then progressively recovering toward baseline with time from transplant. Prednisolone was strongly inversely associated with QFM level (0.1 mg/kg dose increase correlating with 88 IU/mL QFM decrease, 95% CI 61-114, P < .001). Patients with QFM values <10 and <60 IU/mL were more likely to develop a serious opportunistic infection between 3 and 6 months (HR 6.38, 95% CI 1.37-29.66, P = .02) and 6-12 months (HR 3.25, 95% CI 1.11-9.49, P = .03) post-transplant, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: QFM values declined significantly post-transplant, with patients recovering at different rates. Prednisolone dose significantly impacted QFM results. Low levels were associated with infection beyond 3 months post-transplant, suggesting that QFM may be able to identify overly immunosuppressed patients who could be targeted for dose reduction. Larger prospective studies are needed to further evaluate this promising assay.

Cytomegalovirus replication is associated with enrichment of distinct γδ T cell subsets following lung transplantation: A novel therapeutic approach?

BACKGROUND: Anti-viral treatments to control cytomegalovirus (CMV) after lung transplantation (LTx) are associated with toxicity and anti-viral resistance. Cellular immunotherapy with virus-specific cytotoxic T cells has yielded promising results but requires donor/recipient matching. γδ T cells are involved in anti-viral immunity and can recognize antigens independently of major histocompatibility complex molecules and may not require the same level of matching. We assessed the phenotype of circulating γδ T cells after LTx to identify the candidate populations for CMV immunotherapy. METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from lung transplant recipients before transplantation and at routine bronchoscopies after LTx. Patients were stratified by risk of CMV disease into moderate risk (recipient CMV seropositive, n = 15) or high risk (HR) (recipient CMV seronegative/donor CMV seropositive, n = 10). CMV replication was classified as polymerase chain reaction positive (>150 copies/ml) in blood and/or bronchoalveolar lavage within the first 18 months. The phenotype of γδ T cells was assessed by multicolor flow cytometry, and T-cell receptor (TCR) sequences were determined by deep sequencing. RESULTS: In HR lung transplant recipients with CMV replication, we observed striking phenotypic changes in γδ T cells, marked by an increase in the proportion of effector Vδ1+ γδ T cells expressing the activating natural killer cell receptor NKG2C. Moreover, we observed a remarkable increase in TCR diversity. CONCLUSIONS: NKG2C+ Vδ1+ γδ T cells were associated with CMV replication and may indicate their potential to control infection. As such, we propose that they could be a potential target for cellular therapy against CMV.

A Randomized Study of Quantiferon CMV-directed Versus Fixed-duration Valganciclovir Prophylaxis to Reduce Late CMV After Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: We provide the results of the first interventional study of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific immune monitoring to direct the length of antiviral prophylaxis in lung transplantation (LTx). METHODS: Patients (n = 118) at risk of CMV infection were randomized 1:2 to either 5 months or variable length valganciclovir prophylaxis (5-11 mo post-LTx), as determined by the QuantiFERON (QFN)-CMV assay. Patients with a negative QFN-CMV assay (< 0.2 IU/mL) received prolonged valganciclovir prophylaxis. RESULTS: The primary endpoint that was the incidence of CMV infection in the lung allograft within 18 months of LTx was significantly reduced in the QFN-CMV directed arm (37% versus 58%, P = 0.03). Secondary endpoints that included blood viremia, acute rejection, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction did not differ between the 2 arms. Of the 80/118 patients who ceased antiviral prophylaxis at 5 months, the incidence of viremia (> 600 copies/mL) within the blood was significantly reduced in patients with a positive QFN-CMV assay compared with those without protective immunity (13% versus 67%, P = 0.0003), as was the incidence of severe viremia (> 10 000 copies/mL) (3% versus 50%, P < 0.001). Ceasing antiviral prophylaxis at 11 months in patients with a negative assay was associated with a 25% incidence of late CMV viremia. CONCLUSIONS: Cytomegalovirus immune monitoring allows an individualized approach to CMV prophylaxis and reduces late CMV infection within the lung allograft.

Enrichment of Cytomegalovirus-induced NKG2C+ Natural Killer Cells in the Lung Allograft.

BACKGROUND: In lung transplant recipients, immunosuppressive medications result in impaired antiviral immunity and a propensity for cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation within the lung allograft. Natural killer (NK) cells play a key role in immunity to CMV, with an increase in the proportion of NK cells expressing activating CD94-NKG2C receptors in the blood being a strong correlate of CMV infection. Whether a similar increase in NKG2C NK cells occurs in lung transplant recipients following CMV reactivation in the allograft and if such cells contribute to viral control remains unclear. METHODS: In this pilot study, we longitudinally assessed the frequency and phenotype of NKG2C NK cells in the blood and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of lung transplant recipients and stratified recipients based on their risk of developing CMV disease. RESULTS: We observed an increase in the proportion of NKG2C NK cells in the blood and BAL of CMV high-risk patients, coincident with both the cessation of antiviral prophylaxis and subsequent detection of actively replicating CMV in the blood and lung allograft. Additionally, these NKG2C NK cells expressed killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors distinct from those of other NK subsets and BAL NKG2C NK cells possessed an activated phenotype. Finally, the frequency of NKG2C NK cells in the BAL may be inversely correlated with CMV blood titers. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring the phenotype of NK cells postlung transplant may be a useful biomarker for monitoring patient levels of CMV immunity.