Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Innovations (Phila) ; 14(6): 545-552, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31739719

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Robot-assisted lobectomy is the fastest growing technique for pulmonary lobectomy, but the diversity of approaches has led to apprehension about port placement among learning surgeons. The aim of this study was to survey high-volume thoracic surgeons who perform robot-assisted lobectomy to understand and consolidate common themes of port placement. METHODS: An electronic online survey was created, and the link was emailed to the 100 highest volume robotic thoracic surgeons in the United States. The survey included an interactive graphical interface, which allowed each respondent to mark the preferential robotic port placement in the chest wall for each of the 5 pulmonary lobectomies. Results were analyzed individually and in aggregate. A heat map was generated to show trends. RESULTS: One hundred surgeons were surveyed (response rate: 62%). Most (90%) respondents utilized a 4-arm approach and 79% used a completely 4-arm portal approach with CO2 insufflation. Exact locations for each robotic port were reported by 60% of the surveyed surgeons and the results varied; however, most surgeons generally used the seventh to ninth interspaces for the camera and instruments. The use of multiple different interspace levels was common. Ninety-four percent of respondents used an additional nonrobotic assistant port. CONCLUSIONS: There is not a universal port strategy for robot-assisted lobectomy. However, placement of the camera and robotic ports low in the seventh to ninth interspaces is the most common approach. There are some nuances of stapling port strategies and sequence of port placement, which are identified.


Assuntos
Pulmão/cirurgia , Pneumonectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos/instrumentação , Dióxido de Carbono/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Insuflação/métodos , Autorrelato/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/tendências , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos/normas , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos/tendências , Inquéritos e Questionários , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Torácicos/tendências , Parede Torácica/anatomia & histologia , Parede Torácica/cirurgia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Drugs R D ; 13(2): 153-7, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23737454

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Orally available ticagrelor in combination with low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg/day) is indicated for adult patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, patients with swallowing difficulties may be unable to consume the currently available 90-mg tablet. It is hypothesized that ticagrelor could be given to this patient cohort as a crushed dose administered either orally or via a naso-gastric (NG) tube. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potential use of crushed ticagrelor tablets (90- and 180-mg doses) for oral dose or NG tube administration. METHODS: Ticagrelor tablets (90 or 180 mg [two 90-mg tablets]) were prepared to emulate oral and NG tube administration by similar methods. For the oral dose, ticagrelor tablets were crushed using a mortar and pestle and transferred to a dosing cup. 100 mL of water was added to the mortar, stirred, and the contents were transferred to the dosing cup and stirred to form a suspension. At this stage, where the suspension would normally be administered to a patient, it was collected for high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. The mortar was then flushed with 100 mL of water, and the contents were again transferred to the dosing cup, stirred, and collected for HPLC analysis. For the NG dose, polyvinylchloride, polyurethane, and silicone size CH10 NG tubes were used. The tablets were crushed using a mortar and pestle, diluted with 50 mL of water, and stirred. At this stage, where the suspension would normally be administered to a patient through an NG tube using a syringe, it was collected for HPLC analysis. The mortar was then flushed with two additional 50 mL aliquots of water and the contents were passed through the NG tube. HPLC analysis examined the recoverability of ticagrelor in each of the dose suspensions and flushes and the stability of the suspension when held in a syringe for up to 2 h. RESULTS: One or two crushed 90-mg ticagrelor tablets, prepared for either oral or NG tube administration, delivers a mean dose of ≥97% of the original tablet. No degradation of the suspensions was detected after ticagrelor had been held in the syringe for up to 2 h. CONCLUSION: Although not an approved method of administration, these results suggest that ticagrelor tablets can be crushed and prepared for oral administration or for administration via an NG tube. From a clinical perspective, a syringe hold-time of up to 2 h should allow for enough time between preparation and administration (orally or via an NG tube) of the dispersed tablets to the patient. Future studies are required to test the effect of crushed dosing on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters.


Assuntos
Adenosina/análogos & derivados , Estabilidade de Medicamentos , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/análise , Adenosina/administração & dosagem , Adenosina/análise , Administração Oral , Intubação Gastrointestinal , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/administração & dosagem , Suspensões , Comprimidos , Ticagrelor
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA