Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 12(1): 113-8, 1989.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2714067

RESUMO

In this prospective, comparative study, 129 patients who sustained penetrating abdominal trauma were randomized to receive preoperatively, and for 3-5 days postoperatively, one of three antibiotic regimens: Group I--cefotaxime (CTX) (2 Gm Q8H), Group II--cefoxitin (2 Gm Q6H), or Group III--clindamycin (900 mg Q8H) and gentamicin (3-5 mg/kg/day in divided doses Q8H). The three groups were similar in terms of the following: age, sex, severity of injury, number of organs injured, colon injuries, shock, blood transfusions, or positive intraoperative cultures. Septic complications occurred as follows: Group I--6.9%, Group II--2.3%, and Group III--6.9%. The three regimens ranked as follows in terms of therapy costs: CTX less than cefoxitin less than clindamycin and gentamicin. It is concluded that single agent therapy with a cephalosporin is preferable to combination therapy on the basis of equivalent effectiveness, lower toxicity, and lower costs.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Clindamicina/uso terapêutico , Gentamicinas/uso terapêutico , Ferimentos Penetrantes/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Cefotaxima/uso terapêutico , Cefoxitina/uso terapêutico , Custos e Análise de Custo , Quimioterapia Combinada/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Distribuição Aleatória
3.
Drugs ; 35 Suppl 2: 100-5, 1988.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3396471

RESUMO

In this open, prospective, comparative study, 75 patients who sustained penetrating abdominal trauma were randomised to receive 1 of 3 antibiotic regimens preoperatively and for 3 to 5 days postoperatively. Group I received cefotaxime 2g 8-hourly, group II received cefoxitin 2g 6-hourly and group III received clindamycin (900 mg 8-hourly) and gentamicin 3 to 5 mg/kg/day in divided doses 8-hourly. The 3 groups were not statistically different in terms of age, sex, severity of injury, number of organs injured, colon injuries, shock, blood transfusions or positive intra-operative cultures. Septic complications occurred in 8% of patients in group I, in 4% of group II patients and in 8% of group III patients. Cefotaxime was the least costly regimen, followed by cefoxitin, then clindamycin and gentamicin. It may be concluded that single agent therapy with a broad spectrum cephalosporin is preferable to combination therapy on the basis of equivalent effectiveness, less toxicity and lower costs.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais/complicações , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Clindamicina/uso terapêutico , Gentamicinas/uso terapêutico , Ferimentos Penetrantes/complicações , Infecções Bacterianas/etiologia , Cefotaxima/uso terapêutico , Cefoxitina/uso terapêutico , Custos e Análise de Custo , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Distribuição Aleatória
5.
Clin Pharm ; 4(3): 316-20, 1985.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3891203

RESUMO

The effectiveness and total costs of moxalactam administered every 12 hours versus a combination of gentamicin and clindamycin for prophylactic use in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma were compared. Fifty patients scheduled for laparotomy after penetrating abdominal wounds were randomly assigned to receive either clindamycin phosphate 600 mg every six hours with gentamicin (as the sulfate salt) 3-5 mg/kg/day in three divided doses or moxalactam disodium 2 g every 12 hours. Therapy was begun preoperatively and continued for a minimum of three days in patients without hollow-organ injury and five days in patients with hollow-organ injury; total duration of therapy could not exceed four weeks. Patients receiving moxalactam also received phytonadione 10 mg intramuscularly once a week. Although wound cultures from several patients were positive for Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and enterococci, no symptomatic infections developed. No direct toxic effects of moxalactam or gentamicin-clindamycin were seen; transient abnormalities in blood-coagulation tests or serum creatinine concentration occurred in several patients. Although mean drug costs per patient for moxalactam and gentamicin-clindamycin were similar, the mean cost of therapy per patient was $125.23 higher for the combination regimen than for moxalactam when laboratory, personnel-time, and supply costs were added to drug costs. Moxalactam given every 12 hours was a safe and effective alternative to the combination of gentamicin and clindamycin for preventive use in the study patients with penetrating abdominal trauma.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais/complicações , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Clindamicina/uso terapêutico , Gentamicinas/uso terapêutico , Moxalactam/uso terapêutico , Ferimentos Penetrantes/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Custos e Análise de Custo , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Distribuição Aleatória
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...