Noninvasive Assessment of Impaired Gas Exchange with the Alveolar Gas Monitor Predicts Clinical Deterioration in COVID-19 Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic magnified the importance of gas exchange abnormalities in early respiratory failure. Pulse oximetry (SpO2) has not been universally effective for clinical decision-making, possibly because of limitations. The alveolar gas monitor (AGM100) adds exhaled gas tensions to SpO2 to calculate the oxygen deficit (OD). The OD parallels the alveolar-to-arterial oxygen difference (AaDO2) in outpatients with cardiopulmonary disease. We hypothesized that the OD would discriminate between COVID-19 patients who require hospital admission and those who are discharged home, as well as predict need for supplemental oxygen during the index hospitalization. METHODS: Patients presenting with dyspnea and COVID-19 were enrolled with informed consent and had OD measured using the AGM100. The OD was then compared between admitted and discharged patients and between patients who required supplemental oxygen and those who did not. The OD was also compared to SpO2 for each of these outcomes using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Thirty patients were COVID-19 positive and had complete AGM100 data. The mean OD was significantly (p = 0.025) higher among those admitted 50.0 ± 20.6 (mean ± SD) vs. discharged 27.0 ± 14.3 (mean ± SD). The OD was also significantly (p < 0.0001) higher among those requiring supplemental oxygen 60.1 ± 12.9 (mean ± SD) vs. those remaining on room air 25.2 ± 11.9 (mean ± SD). ROC curves for the OD demonstrated very good and excellent sensitivity for predicting hospital admission and supplemental oxygen administration, respectively. The OD performed better than an SpO2 threshold of <94%. CONCLUSIONS: The AGM100 is a novel, noninvasive way of measuring impaired gas exchange for clinically important endpoints in COVID-19.

Implementing Holistic Review Practices in a Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellowship.

Background: Medical schools have used holistic review in admissions to increase mission-aligned enrollment of students from backgrounds underrepresented in medicine. Graduate medical education programs have increasingly followed suit. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding holistic review at the fellowship level. Objective: Here, we share our experience implementing the Association of American Medical Colleges core principles of holistic review during the 2021 recruitment cycle. Methods: We used a partially asynchronous and online learning strategy to train division members on the principles of holistic review. Following the match, we conducted a survey of faculty members and fellows to understand their opinions on our holistic review training and implementation. Results: Although few of our colleagues clearly understood holistic review before the training, they were able to identify broad-based criteria that aligned with our division's mission and balanced applicants' experiences, attributes, competencies, and metrics. These were viewed as better selection criteria than traditional measures and were incorporated into the individualized consideration of applicants. Our survey had a 41.5% response rate, with 10 of 22 fellows and 24 of 60 faculty members responding. Most faculty members and fellows agreed that holistic review decreases socioeconomic disparities in fellowship recruitment (79.2% and 80.0%, respectively) and promotes inclusion and diversity (83.3% and 90.0%, respectively). Faculty members appeared more confident than fellows that our training efforts had influenced recruitment. All respondents agreed that it would be critical for such training to be repeated yearly. Conclusion: Although this was a single-institution experience, implementing holistic review was feasible and well received by faculty and fellows.

Noninvasive measurement of pulmonary gas exchange: comparison with data from arterial blood gases.

A new noninvasive method was used to measure the impairment of pulmonary gas exchange in 34 patients with lung disease, and the results were compared with the traditional ideal alveolar-arterial Po2 difference (AaDO2) calculated from arterial blood gases. The end-tidal Po2 was measured from the expired gas during steady-state breathing, the arterial Po2 was derived from a pulse oximeter if the SpO2 was 95% or less, which was the case for 23 patients. The difference between the end-tidal and the calculated Po2 was defined as the oxygen deficit. Oxygen deficit was 42.7 mmHg (SE 4.0) in this group of patients, much higher than the means previously found in 20 young normal subjects measured under hypoxic conditions (2.0 mmHg, SE 0.8) and 11 older normal subjects (7.5 mmHg, SE 1.6) and emphasizes the sensitivity of the new method for detecting the presence of abnormal gas exchange. The oxygen deficit was correlated with AaDO2 ( R2 0.72). The arterial Po2 that was calculated from the noninvasive technique was correlated with the results from the arterial blood gases ( R2 0.76) and with a mean bias of +2.7 mmHg. The Pco2 was correlated with the results from the arterial blood gases (R2 0.67) with a mean bias of -3.6 mmHg. We conclude that the oxygen deficit as obtained from the noninvasive method is a very sensitive indicator of impaired pulmonary gas exchange. It has the advantage that it can be obtained within a few minutes by having the patient simply breathe through a tube.

A New, Noninvasive Method of Measuring Impaired Pulmonary Gas Exchange in Lung Disease: An Outpatient Study.

BACKGROUND: It would be valuable to have a noninvasive method of measuring impaired pulmonary gas exchange in patients with lung disease and thus reduce the need for repeated arterial punctures. This study reports the results of using a new test in a group of outpatients attending a pulmonary clinic. METHODS: Inspired and expired partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) and Pco2 are continually measured by small, rapidly responding analyzers. The arterial PO2 is calculated from the oximeter blood oxygen saturation level and the oxygen dissociation curve. The PO2 difference between the end-tidal gas and the calculated arterial value is called the oxygen deficit. RESULTS: Studies on 17 patients with a variety of pulmonary diseases are reported. The mean ± SE oxygen deficit was 48.7 ± 3.1 mm Hg. This finding can be contrasted with a mean oxygen deficit of 4.0 ± 0.88 mm Hg in a group of 31 normal subjects who were previously studied (P < .0001). The analysis emphasizes the value of measuring the composition of alveolar gas in determining ventilation-perfusion ratio inequality. This factor is largely ignored in the classic index of impaired pulmonary gas exchange using the ideal alveolar PO2 to calculate the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient. CONCLUSIONS: The results previously reported in normal subjects and the present studies suggest that this new noninvasive test will be valuable in assessing abnormal gas exchange in the clinical setting.