Bilateral remote ischemic conditioning in children: A two-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial in young children undergoing cardiac surgery.

Objective: The study objective was to determine whether adequately delivered bilateral remote ischemic preconditioning is cardioprotective in young children undergoing surgery for 2 common congenital heart defects with or without cyanosis. Methods: We performed a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial at 2 centers in the United Kingdom. Children aged 3 to 36 months undergoing tetralogy of Fallot repair or ventricular septal defect closure were randomized 1:1 to receive bilateral preconditioning or sham intervention. Participants were followed up until hospital discharge or 30 days. The primary outcome was area under the curve for high-sensitivity troponin-T in the first 24 hours after surgery, analyzed by intention-to-treat. Right atrial biopsies were obtained in selected participants. Results: Between October 2016 and December 2020, 120 eligible children were randomized to receive bilateral preconditioning (n = 60) or sham intervention (n = 60). The primary outcome, area under the curve for high-sensitivity troponin-T, was higher in the preconditioning group (mean: 70.0 ± 50.9 µg/L/h, n = 56) than in controls (mean: 55.6 ± 30.1 µg/L/h, n = 58) (mean difference, 13.2 µg/L/h; 95% CI, 0.5-25.8; P = .04). Subgroup analyses did not show a differential treatment effect by oxygen saturations (pinteraction = .25), but there was evidence of a differential effect by underlying defect (pinteraction = .04). Secondary outcomes and myocardial metabolism, quantified in atrial biopsies, were not different between randomized groups. Conclusions: Bilateral remote ischemic preconditioning does not attenuate myocardial injury in children undergoing surgical repair for congenital heart defects, and there was evidence of potential harm in unstented tetralogy of Fallot. The routine use of remote ischemic preconditioning cannot be recommended for myocardial protection during pediatric cardiac surgery.

Revisiting the anatomy of the left ventricle in the light of knowledge of its development.

Despite centuries of investigation, certain aspects of left ventricular anatomy remain either controversial or uncertain. We make no claims to have resolved these issues, but our review, based on our current knowledge of development, hopefully identifies the issues requiring further investigation. When first formed, the left ventricle had only inlet and apical components. With the expansion of the atrioventricular canal, the developing ventricle cedes part of its inlet to the right ventricle whilst retaining the larger parts of the cushions dividing the atrioventricular canal. Further remodelling of the interventricular communication provides the ventricle with its outlet, with the aortic root being transferred to the left ventricle along with the newly formed myocardium supporting its leaflets. The definitive ventricle possesses inlet, apical and outlet parts. The inlet component is guarded by the mitral valve, with its leaflets, in the normal heart, supported by papillary muscles located infero-septally and supero-laterally. There is but a solitary zone of apposition between the leaflets, which we suggest are best described as being aortic and mural. The trabeculated component extends beyond the inlet to the apex and is confluent with the outlet part, which supports the aortic root. The leaflets of the aortic valve are supported in semilunar fashion within the root, with the ventricular cavity extending to the sinutubular junction. The myocardial-arterial junction, however, stops well short of the sinutubular junction, with myocardium found only at the bases of the sinuses, giving rise to the coronary arteries. We argue that the relationships between the various components should now be described using attitudinally appropriate terms rather than describing them as if the heart is removed from the body and positioned on its apex.

Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries in Utero: Morphological Spectrum, Outcomes and Pitfalls in Fetal Diagnosis.

Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) is a rare malformation with diverse morphology. We assessed features of fetuses with ccTGA and evaluated neonatal and pediatric outcomes. This was a retrospective review of fetuses with ccTGA at Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital born from 2005 to 2019. Of thirty-six fetuses identified, six had unavailable prenatal data, one was postnatally diagnosed with isomerism and 29 fetuses were evaluated. ccTGA without associated cardiac lesions was found in 28% (8/29), ccTGA with significant VSD in 31% (9/29), ccTGA with pulmonary obstruction in 24% (7/29) and ccTGA with complex anomalies in 17% (5/29). Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) was observed in 17% (5/29) and heart block (HB) in 10% (3/29) prenatally. Six, that is 21% underwent genetic testing of which one was abnormal. Five extra-cardiac anomalies were reported prenatally and postnatally. Pregnancy was discontinued in five, of which two had moderate TR. There were thirty-one liveborn. Coarctation of the aorta was found in five postnatally but not suspected prenatally. In one, pulmonary stenosis was underestimated; otherwise, prenatal morphology was confirmed. Cardiac interventions were performed in 77% (24/31) liveborn with 39% (12/31) undergoing neonatal intervention. Overall, 6/31 liveborn died including all three with prenatal heart block and one with TR. Estimated survival for all liveborn at 1, 5 and 10 years was 87% (95% CI 76-100%), 83% (95% CI 72-98%) and 80% (95% CI 66-96%) respectively. Accurate prenatal diagnosis of ccTGA is critical for counseling. Early outcomes are favorable with 77% of liveborn undergoing surgery. Fetuses with prenatal diagnosis of complex associated abnormalities, HB and TR appear to do less well.

Revisiting the anatomy of the right ventricle in the light of knowledge of its development.

Controversies continue regarding several aspects of the anatomy of the morphologically right ventricle. There is disagreement as to whether the ventricle should be assessed in bipartite or tripartite fashion, and the number of leaflets to be found in the tricuspid valve. In particular, there is no agreement as to whether a muscular outlet septum is present in the normally constructed heart, nor how many septal components are to be found during normal development. Resolving these issues is of potential significance to those investigating and treating children with congenitally malformed hearts. With all these issues in mind, we have revisited our own experience in investigating the development and morphology of the normal right ventricle. To assess development, we have examined a large number of datasets, prepared by both standard and episcopic microscopy, from human and murine embryos. In terms of gross anatomy, we have compared dissections of normal autopsied hearts with virtual dissections of datasets prepared using computed tomography. Our developmental and postnatal studies, taken together, confirm that the ventricle is best assessed in tripartite fashion, with the three parts representing its inlet, apical trabecular, and outlet components. The ventricular septum, however, has only muscular and membranous components. The muscular part incorporates a small component derived from the muscularised fused proximal outflow cushions, but this part cannot be distinguished from the much larger part that is incorporated within the free-standing muscular infundibular sleeve. We confirm that the tricuspid valve itself has three components, which are located inferiorly, septally, and antero-superiorly.

Which Phenotypes Should We Include in the Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome?

The recent special issue of the World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery devoted to hypoplastic left heart syndrome, and its related anomalies, contained significant information of great clinical relevance. Very little attention, however, was devoted to the integrity of ventricular septum as providing a criterion to distinguish between the phenotypes to be included within the syndrome, as opposed to the related anomalies. In this commentary, we summarize the evidence in support of the notion that the phenotypes to be included within the syndrome can be interpreted on the basis of an acquired disease of fetal life. We suggest that it is the integrity of the ventricular septum that provided the major criterion for the distinction between the lesions making up the syndrome and the related anomalies. The subsets of lesions to be included within the syndrome can then be recognized in terms of the time, subsequent to the closure of the embryonic interventricular communication, at which the left ventricle ceased its growth relative to the remainder of the cardiac components. On this basis, it is possible to recognize the combinations of aortic and mitral atresia, mitral stenosis with aortic atresia, combined mitral and aortic stenosis, and hypoplasia of the left ventricle with commensurate hypoplasia of the aortic and mitral valves; the latter combination now recognized as the hypoplastic left heart complex.

Expert Consensus Statement: Anatomy, Imaging, and Nomenclature of Congenital Aortic Root Malformations.

Over the past 2 decades, several categorizations have been proposed for the abnormalities of the aortic root. These schemes have mostly been devoid of input from specialists of congenital cardiac disease. The aim of this review is to provide a classification, from the perspective of these specialists, based on an understanding of normal and abnormal morphogenesis and anatomy, with emphasis placed on the features of clinical and surgical relevance. We contend that the description of the congenitally malformed aortic root is simplified when approached in a fashion that recognizes the normal root to be made up of 3 leaflets, supported by their own sinuses, with the sinuses themselves separated by the interleaflet triangles. The malformed root, usually found in the setting of 3 sinuses, can also be found with 2 sinuses, and very rarely with 4 sinuses. This permits description of trisinuate, bisinuate, and quadrisinuate variants, respectively. This feature then provides the basis for classification of the anatomical and functional number of leaflets present. By offering standardized terms and definitions, we submit that our classification will be suitable for those working in all cardiac specialties, whether pediatric or adult. It is of equal value in the settings of acquired or congenital cardiac disease. Our recommendations will serve to amend and/or add to the existing International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code, along with the Eleventh iteration of the International Classification of Diseases provided by the World Health Organization.

Expert Consensus Statement: Anatomy, Imaging, and Nomenclature of Congenital Aortic Root Malformations.

Over the past 2 decades, several categorizations have been proposed for the abnormalities of the aortic root. These schemes have mostly been devoid of input from specialists of congenital cardiac disease. The aim of this review is to provide a classification, from the perspective of these specialists, based on an understanding of normal and abnormal morphogenesis and anatomy, with emphasis placed on the features of clinical and surgical relevance. We contend that the description of the congenitally malformed aortic root is simplified when approached in a fashion that recognizes the normal root to be made up of 3 leaflets, supported by their own sinuses, with the sinuses themselves separated by the interleaflet triangles. The malformed root, usually found in the setting of 3 sinuses, can also be found with 2 sinuses, and very rarely with 4 sinuses. This permits description of trisinuate, bisinuate, and quadrisinuate variants, respectively. This feature then provides the basis for classification of the anatomical and functional number of leaflets present. By offering standardized terms and definitions, we submit that our classification will be suitable for those working in all cardiac specialties, whether pediatric or adult. It is of equal value in the settings of acquired or congenital cardiac disease. Our recommendations will serve to amend and/or add to the existing International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code, along with the Eleventh iteration of the International Classification of Diseases provided by the World Health Organization.

Outcomes of the arterial switch for transposition during infancy using a standardized approach over 30 years.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the early and late outcomes of the arterial switch for transposition. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted to assess the early and late outcomes of arterial switch performed during infancy using a standardized institutional approach between 1988 and 2018, compared by morphological groups. RESULTS: A total of 749 consecutive patients undergoing arterial switch during infancy were included, 464 (61.9%) with intact septum, 163 (21.8%) with isolated ventricular septal defect and 122 (16.3%) with complex transposition with associated lesions, including 67 (8.9%) with Taussig-Bing anomaly. There were 34 early deaths [4.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1-6.1] with only 10 (2.6%) early deaths since 2000. Complex morphology (odds ratio 11.44, 95% CI 4.76-27.43) and intramural coronary artery (odds ratio 5.17, 95% CI 1.61-15.91) were identified as the most important risk factors for 90-day mortality. Overall survival was 92.7% (95% CI 90.8-94.6) at 5 years and 91.9% (95% CI 89.9-94.1) at 20 years; in hospital survivors, there were 15 (2.1%) late deaths during a median follow-up of 13.7 years. Cumulative incidence of surgical or catheter reintervention was 16.0% (95% CI 14.5-17.5) at 5 years and 22.7% (95% CI 21.0-24.0) at 20 years; early and late reinterventions were more common in the complex group, with no difference between the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Using a standardized approach, the arterial switch can be performed with low early mortality, moderate rates of reintervention and excellent long-term survival. Concomitant lesions were the most important risk factor for early death and were associated with increased risk of late reintervention.

What Is the Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome?

As yet, there is no agreed definition for the so-called "hypoplastic left heart syndrome". Even its origin remains contentious. Noonan and Nadas, who as far as we can establish first grouped together patients as belonging to a "syndrome" in 1958, suggested that Lev had named the entity. Lev, however, when writing in 1952, had described "hypoplasia of the aortic outflow tract complex". In his initial description, as with Noonan and Nadas, he included cases with ventricular septal defects. In a subsequent account, he suggested that only those with an intact ventricular septum be included within the syndrome. There is much to commend this later approach. When assessed on the basis of the integrity of the ventricular septum, the hearts to be included can be interpreted as showing an acquired disease of fetal life. Recognition of this fact is important to those seeking to establish the genetic background of left ventricular hypoplasia. Flow is also of importance, with septal integrity then influencing its effect on the structure of the hypoplastic ventricle. In our review, we summarise the evidence supporting the notion that an intact ventricular septum should now be part of the definition of the hypoplastic left heart syndrome.

The Significance of Ventricular Topology in the Analysis of Congenitally Malformed Hearts.

There are still confusing descriptions of how congenitally malformed hearts should be categorised, even in their simplest forms. Despite repeated attempts toward a unified and simplified analysis, morphologists and clinicians continue to use different nomenclatures. This variability has a profound impact not only on how we communicate with patients but also on how the healthcare professionals produce clinical reports, research papers and educational and training materials, not to mention the impact on other levels such as managerial, administrative, coding, financial and media communications. Moreover, there are influences on how we actually treat patients based on a different understanding of nomenclature. This paper aims to explain a method of analysing the cardiac segments and their connections based on the current understanding of structural development.

Nomenclature for Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Care: Unification of Clinical and Administrative Nomenclature - The 2021 International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code (IPCCC) and the Eleventh Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11).

Substantial progress has been made in the standardization of nomenclature for paediatric and congenital cardiac care. In 1936, Maude Abbott published her Atlas of Congenital Cardiac Disease, which was the first formal attempt to classify congenital heart disease. The International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code (IPCCC) is now utilized worldwide and has most recently become the paediatric and congenital cardiac component of the Eleventh Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). The most recent publication of the IPCCC was in 2017. This manuscript provides an updated 2021 version of the IPCCC.The International Society for Nomenclature of Paediatric and Congenital Heart Disease (ISNPCHD), in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO), developed the paediatric and congenital cardiac nomenclature that is now within the eleventh version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). This unification of IPCCC and ICD-11 is the IPCCC ICD-11 Nomenclature and is the first time that the clinical nomenclature for paediatric and congenital cardiac care and the administrative nomenclature for paediatric and congenital cardiac care are harmonized. The resultant congenital cardiac component of ICD-11 was increased from 29 congenital cardiac codes in ICD-9 and 73 congenital cardiac codes in ICD-10 to 318 codes submitted by ISNPCHD through 2018 for incorporation into ICD-11. After these 318 terms were incorporated into ICD-11 in 2018, the WHO ICD-11 team added an additional 49 terms, some of which are acceptable legacy terms from ICD-10, while others provide greater granularity than the ISNPCHD thought was originally acceptable. Thus, the total number of paediatric and congenital cardiac terms in ICD-11 is 367. In this manuscript, we describe and review the terminology, hierarchy, and definitions of the IPCCC ICD-11 Nomenclature. This article, therefore, presents a global system of nomenclature for paediatric and congenital cardiac care that unifies clinical and administrative nomenclature.The members of ISNPCHD realize that the nomenclature published in this manuscript will continue to evolve. The version of the IPCCC that was published in 2017 has evolved and changed, and it is now replaced by this 2021 version. In the future, ISNPCHD will again publish updated versions of IPCCC, as IPCCC continues to evolve.

Nomenclature for Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Care: Unification of Clinical and Administrative Nomenclature - The 2021 International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code (IPCCC) and the Eleventh Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11).

Substantial progress has been made in the standardization of nomenclature for paediatric and congenital cardiac care. In 1936, Maude Abbott published her Atlas of Congenital Cardiac Disease, which was the first formal attempt to classify congenital heart disease. The International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code (IPCCC) is now utilized worldwide and has most recently become the paediatric and congenital cardiac component of the Eleventh Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). The most recent publication of the IPCCC was in 2017. This manuscript provides an updated 2021 version of the IPCCC.The International Society for Nomenclature of Paediatric and Congenital Heart Disease (ISNPCHD), in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO), developed the paediatric and congenital cardiac nomenclature that is now within the eleventh version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). This unification of IPCCC and ICD-11 is the IPCCC ICD-11 Nomenclature and is the first time that the clinical nomenclature for paediatric and congenital cardiac care and the administrative nomenclature for paediatric and congenital cardiac care are harmonized. The resultant congenital cardiac component of ICD-11 was increased from 29 congenital cardiac codes in ICD-9 and 73 congenital cardiac codes in ICD-10 to 318 codes submitted by ISNPCHD through 2018 for incorporation into ICD-11. After these 318 terms were incorporated into ICD-11 in 2018, the WHO ICD-11 team added an additional 49 terms, some of which are acceptable legacy terms from ICD-10, while others provide greater granularity than the ISNPCHD thought was originally acceptable. Thus, the total number of paediatric and congenital cardiac terms in ICD-11 is 367. In this manuscript, we describe and review the terminology, hierarchy, and definitions of the IPCCC ICD-11 Nomenclature. This article, therefore, presents a global system of nomenclature for paediatric and congenital cardiac care that unifies clinical and administrative nomenclature.The members of ISNPCHD realize that the nomenclature published in this manuscript will continue to evolve. The version of the IPCCC that was published in 2017 has evolved and changed, and it is now replaced by this 2021 version. In the future, ISNPCHD will again publish updated versions of IPCCC, as IPCCC continues to evolve.

Congenitally Malformed Hearts: Aspects of Teaching and Research Involving Medical Students.

To appreciate congenital heart disease fully, a detailed understanding of the anatomical presentation, as well as the physiology, is required. This is often introduced at an advanced stage of training. Professor Anderson has been influential in the Clinical Anatomy Intercalated BSc programme at the University of Birmingham, in particular in his teaching on Sequential Segmental Analysis. This article describes the experiences of the latest cohort of students on this programme, who undertook varying research projects using the Birmingham Cardiac Archive, with the guidance of Professor Anderson. The projects outlined include various aspects of isomerism, encompassing both the cardiac and abdominal manifestations, as well as details of congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries and prenatally diagnosed right aortic arch and double arch. These studies all aimed to increase the knowledge base of their respective cardiac malformations and provide a basis for further research.

Defining transposition: What have we learnt?

Understanding transposition is important for all who hope to effectively treat patients with the condition. The variants of the condition are frequently debated in the literature. We describe an unusual variant of transposition, in which despite the arterial roots being supported by morphologically inappropriate ventricles, the roots themselves were normally related, with the intrapericardial arterial trunks spiraling as they extended into the mediastinum. The specimen was identified following the re-categorization of our archive, and we subsequently conducted a detailed analysis of the underlying morphology. Using the principles of sequential segmental analysis, we compared the morphology with standard examples previously described. We show how it was the recognition of such hearts that promoted that concept that the combination of connections across the atrioventricular and ventriculo-arterial junctions was the essence of transposition. In the most common variant, the arrangements are concordant at the atrioventricular junctions, but discordant at the ventriculo-arterial junctions. We suggest that the overall arrangement of discordant ventriculo-arterial connections is best described simply as "transposition." When the discordant ventriculo-arterial connections are combined with similarly discordant connections at the atrioventricular junctions, the transposition is congenitally corrected. We point out that the use of "d" and "l" as prefixes does not distinguish between transposition and its congenitally corrected variant. For those using segmental notations, the correct description for the rare variant found in the setting of a posteriorly located aortic root with the usual atrial arrangement is transposition (S, D, NR).

Morphology of vascular ring arch anomalies influences prognosis and management.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the anatomical features of aortic arch anomalies associated with vascular rings, hoping to identify those which may increase the risk of symptomatic presentation and surgical intervention. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study at a single cardiac unit. Individuals diagnosed with an aortic arch anomaly, either isolated or non-isolated, between June 2014 and September 2018 were included. The morphology of the aortic arch was established via analysis of postnatal echocardiography, CT or MRI scans. CT and magnetic resonance studies were evaluated for the presence of a Kommerell diverticulum in those with aberrant vessels. Case notes were reviewed for relevant clinical data. RESULTS: Of those with aberrant subclavian arteries, 24/79 (30.4%) were shown to have a Kommerell diverticulum. Additional forms of congenital heart disease were present in 133/227 (58.6%) individuals. Surgical division of the vascular ring was performed in 30/227 (13.2%), most commonly in the setting of a double aortic arch (70.8%). In those with aberrant subclavian arteries, no children without a Kommerell diverticulum were referred for surgery. In those with a Kommerell diverticulum confirmed on imaging, 11/24 underwent surgery. CONCLUSION: Individuals with a double aortic arch, or an aberrant subclavian artery arising from a Kommerell diverticulum, have the highest requirement for surgical intervention, especially in isolated anomalies. These individuals should remain under monitoring. The subjective nature of symptoms remains problematic. Longitudinal research is required further to understand the natural history of vascular rings and how it links to morphology.

Anatomical Studies of Transposition - An Argument for a Unifying Morphological Classification.

In the setting of transposition, recognition of the variability in the morphology of the outflow tracts and the arterial trunks is essential for surgical repair. Presence of a unifying system for classification would minimize the risk of misunderstanding. We examined an archive of 142 unrepaired hearts with transposition, defined as the combination of concordant atrioventricular and discordant ventriculoarterial connections, combined with the clinical records of 727 patients undergoing the arterial switch procedures. In the setting of usual atrial arrangement, we found the aortic root in leftward or posterior location in up to 5% of our cohorts, making the common term "d-transposition" ambiguous. Variability in the relationship of the trunks was commoner in the setting of deficient ventricular septation, especially when the trunks were side-by-side (14% vs 5.5% when the ventricular septum was intact). Bilateral infundibulums were present in 14% of cases, and bilaterally deficient infundibulums in 3.5%. Both of these findings were more common with deficient ventricular septation. Fibrous continuity between the tricuspid and pulmonary valves was not always seen with perimembranous defects, particularly when there were bilateral infundibulums. Fibrous continuity between the leaflets of the tricuspid and mitral valves, in contrast, proved a unifying characteristic of the perimembranous defect. The combination of concordant atrioventricular and discordant ventriculoarterial connections is best described simply as "transposition," with precision provided when details are given of atrial arrangement and the relationships of the arterial trunks.

Borders as opposed to so-called geography: which should be used to classify isolated ventricular septal defects?

OBJECTIVES: Ventricular septal defects can be classified according to their borders or according to the fashion in which they open to the right ventricle, so-called geography. As yet, there is no consensus as to how they should be classified. In an attempt to achieve agreement, the International Society for Nomenclature of Congenital and Paediatric Heart Disease, in 2018, proposed a system incorporating both approaches. We have assessed the subjectivity of their suggested terms hoping to determine their suitability in the desired universal system for classification. METHODS: We examined 212 specimens held in the archive of Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital. Each defect was described by 3 independent examiners on the basis of borders and their relationship to the landmarks of the right ventricle. The interobserver agreement was then calculated using Fleiss' method. RESULTS: Calculations to assess interobserver agreement showed that the examiners were more likely to agree on the borders of the defects than their so-called geography (κ = 0.804 vs κ = 0.518). The landmarks of the right ventricle proved to be highly variable such that the application of 'geographic' terms to hearts with perimembranous defects proved particularly challenging. CONCLUSIONS: Interobserver agreement is lower when using terms based on 'geography' as opposed to borders. Whilst providing important morphological detail, the terms based on right ventricular landmarks are highly subjective. They should not be prioritized in a universal system of classification. Instead, the defects can be classified simply by using 'perimembranous', 'muscular', or 'doubly committed and juxta-arterial' as first-order terms.

An Unusual Combination of Double Inlet Left Ventricle With Discordant Ventriculoarterial Connections and Bilateral Arterial Ducts.

The presence of bilaterally persistent arterial ducts is an uncommon abnormality. Here, we describe the anatomy and successful management of an unusual patient with bilateral ducts in the setting of double inlet left ventricle, discordant ventriculoarterial connections, aortic atresia, and a severely hypoplastic and serpentine aortic arch.