Immune Reconstitution in Severely Immunosuppressed Antiretroviral-Naive HIV-1-Infected Patients Starting Efavirenz, Lopinavir-Ritonavir, or Atazanavir-Ritonavir Plus Tenofovir/Emtricitabine: Final 48-Week Results (The Advanz-3 Trial).

BACKGROUND: Few randomized clinical trials have investigated antiretroviral regimens in very advanced HIV-1-infected patients. The objective was to study the immune reconstitution in very immunosuppressed antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected individuals by comparing an efavirenz-based regimen with 2 ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor regimens. METHODS: Randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter clinical trial. Eighty-nine HIV-1-infected antiretroviral-naive patients with <100 CD4 cells per cubic millimeter were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to efavirenz (n = 29), atazanavir/ritonavir (n = 30), or lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 30) combined with tenofovir plus emtricitabine. The primary outcome was median increase in CD4 cell count at week 48. Secondary end points were the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per milliliter, adverse events, disease progression, and death. RESULTS: In the on-treatment analysis, the median (interquartile range) increase in the CD4 count after 48 weeks was +193 (129-349) cells per microliter in the efavirenz arm, +197 (146-238) cells per microliter in the ritonavir-boosted atazanavir arm, and +205 (178-327) cells per microliter in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir arm (P = 0.73). The percentage of patients achieving viral suppression was similar in all 3 treatment arms at 48 weeks {efavirenz, 85.71% [95% confidence interval (CI): 68.5 to 94.3]; atazanavir, 80% [95% CI: 62.7 to 90.5]; and lopinavir, 82.8% [95% CI: 65.5 to 92.4]; P = 0.88}. Bacterial translocation, inflammation, immune activation, and apoptotic markers, but not D-dimer, declined significantly and similarly in the 3 treatment arms. Adverse events had a similar incidence in all 3 antiretroviral regimens. No patients died. CONCLUSIONS: The immune reconstitution induced by an efavirenz-based regimen in very advanced HIV-1-infected patients was similar to that induced by a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based regimen (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00532168).

Immunological function restoration with lopinavir/ritonavir versus efavirenz containing regimens in HIV-infected patients: a randomized clinical trial.

CD4(+) count increase has been reported to be different with lopinavir/r (LPV/r) and efavirenz (EFV)-containing regimens. The different effect of these two regimens on other immune function parameters and the relationship with the gain of CD4(+) count have not been assessed in a randomized clinical trial. Fifty antiretroviral treatment (cART) naïve HIV-infected individuals were randomized to receive LPV/r or EFV both with tenofovir/emtricitabine for 48 weeks. A substudy of immunological function restoration was performed in 22 patients (LPV/r n=10 and EFV n=12). Activation, thymic function, apoptosis, senescence, exhaustion, Treg cells, interleukin (IL)-7-receptor/IL-7 system, thymic volume, and lymphoid tissue fibrosis were evaluated at baseline and at week 48. Both groups experienced a CD4(+) count increase that was higher in the EFV group (ΔCD4(+) 88 vs. 315 cells/µl LPV/r vs. EFV, respectively, p<0.001). Despite this difference in CD4(+) gain, the change in other immune function parameters was similar in both treatment groups. Most of parameters evaluated tended to normalize after 48 weeks of cART. A significant decrease in levels of activation, senescence, exhaustion, and apoptosis on CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells (p<0.001 for all) and a significant increase in markers of thymic function, IL-7 receptor, and in the levels of central memory CD4(+) T cells and naive subsets of CD8(+) T cells (p<0.001 for all) with respect to baseline values were observed without any difference between groups. These data indicate that the differences in CD4(+) gain with different cART regimens are not immunologically meaningful and might explain the similar clinical efficacy of these regimens.

Post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection: a clinical trial comparing lopinavir/ritonavir versus atazanavir each with zidovudine/lamivudine.

BACKGROUND: A clinical trial comparing the rate of discontinuation and tolerability of two post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) regimens was performed. METHODS: A total of 255 individuals attending the emergency rooms of six hospitals for exposure to HIV and criteria to receive PEP were randomized to receive zidovudine/lamivudine plus either lopinavir/ritonavir (n=131) or atazanavir (n=124; day 0). The primary end point was the rate of PEP discontinuation before day 28 of follow-up. Secondary end points were incidence of side effects, follow-up at days 90 and 180 and rate of seroconversions. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients (29 in lopinavir/ritonavir and 26 in atazanavir arms) did not attend the first scheduled appointment (day 1) and were excluded from the analysis. The rate of discontinuation before day 28 owing to any cause was similar between groups (37/102 [36%] in lopinavir/ritonavir and 35/98 [36%] in atazanavir arms, P=0.82). Adverse events were the reason for discontinuation or switching of PEP in 33 individuals (16/102 [16%] in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm and 17/98 [17%] in the atazanavir arm, P=0.84). Adverse events were reported in 92/200 (46%) of individuals on PEP who attend at least the day 1 appointment (50/102 [49%] in the lopinavir/ritonavir arm and 42/98 [43%] in the atazanavir arm, P=0.38). There were no seroconversions. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of discontinuation of PEP before day 28 was similar with zidovudine/lamivudine plus either lopinavir/ritonavir or atazanavir. The rate of discontinuation of PEP because of adverse events was low in both arms. Almost 50% of the patients of both arms suffered side effects. New strategies are needed to improve the tolerance.

Immune reconstitution in severely immunosuppressed antiretroviral-naive HIV type 1-infected patients using a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based or a boosted protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral regimen: three-year results (The Advanz Trial): a randomized, controlled trial.

Late diagnosis of HIV-1 infection is quite frequent in Western countries. Very few randomized clinical trials to determine the best antiretroviral treatment in patients with advanced HIV-1 infection have been performed. To compare immune reconstitution in two groups of very immunosuppressed (less than 100 CD4(+) cells/microl), antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected adults, 65 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive zidovudine + lamivudine + efavirenz (group A, 34 patients) or zidovudine + lamivudine + ritonavir-boosted indinavir (group B, 31 patients). The median (interquartile range) CD4(+) cell increase after 12 and 36 months was +199 (101, 258) and +299 (170, 464) cells/microl in the efavirenz arm and +136 (57, 235) and +228 (119, 465) cells/microl in the ritonavir-boosted indinavir arm (p > 0.05 for all time points). The proportion (95% confidence interval) of patients achieving HIV-1 RNA levels under 50 copies/ml was significantly greater in the efavirenz arm at 3 years by the intention-to-treat analysis [59% (41%, 75%) vs. 23% (10%, 41%)], whereas no differences were found in the on-treatment analysis. Immune activation (CD8(+)CD38(+) and CD8(+)CD38DR(+) T cells) was significantly lower for the efavirenz arm from month 6 to month 24. Adverse events were more frequent in the ritonavir-boosted indinavir arm. Almost all cases of disease progression and death were observed in the first year of treatment, with no significant differences between the two arms (p = 0.79 by the log-rank test). At 1 and 3 years, the immune reconstitution induced by an efavirenz-based regimen in very immunosuppressed patients was at least as potent as that induced by a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral regimen.

Therapeutic immunization with dendritic cells loaded with heat-inactivated autologous HIV-1 in patients with chronic HIV-1 infection.

Therapeutic immunization with autologous monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs) loaded with heat-inactivated autologous human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in 12 patients with chronic HIV-1 infection who were receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was feasible, safe, and well tolerated. Virus was obtained during an initial interruption of HAART (hereafter, "stop 1") so that DCs could be pulsed. After immunization and a second interruption of HAART (hereafter, "stop 2"), set-point plasma viral load (PVL; 24 weeks after stop 2) decreased > or =0.5 log(10) copies/mL relative to baseline PVL in 4 of 12 patients. We observed a significant lengthening in mean doubling time of PVL rebound and significant decreases in the area under the curve and the mean peak of PVL rebound after stop 2, compared with those after stop 1. This response was associated with changes in HIV-1-specific CD4(+) lymphoproliferative and CD8(+) T cell responses. These changes were not observed in a group of nonimmunized control patients.

Long-term clinical follow-up, without antiretroviral therapy, of patients with chronic HIV-1 infection with good virological response to structured treatment interruption.

The present study assessed the long-term clinical follow-up of 26 of 60 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients who followed structured treatment interruption (STI) protocols and who, because of good virological response, did not resume receipt of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The plasma viral load (pVL) noted after > or =2 years without antiretroviral therapy remained significantly lower than the pVL noted before initiation of HAART, for 11 of the 26 patients (i.e., for 18% of the 60 patients who had STI performed). The CD4+ T cell count remained stable throughout the study. A low pVL at the end of follow-up was independently associated with a low CD8+CD38+ T lymphocyte count and a high stimulation index to p24 antigen after STI. In conclusion, approximately 2 years after STI, only a low proportion of patients who had a good immunological profile at the end of the STI period still had a good virological response.

Relevance of HIV-1-specific CD4+ helper T-cell responses during structured treatment interruptions in patients with CD4+ T-cell nadir above 400/mm3.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the dynamics of both HIV-1-specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses during structured treatment interruptions (STIs) in chronically HIV-1-infected (CHI) patients and to correlate them with the viral set point achieved. METHODS: Forty-five early-stage CHI patients who were on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for at least 1 year and underwent STI were included. Plasma viral load (VL), peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) lymphoproliferative (LPR) response to HIV p24 protein, and HIV-1 epitope-specific interferon-gammarelease from CD8 T cells were measured over a minimum study period of 2 years. RESULTS: VL set point during final STI was both significantly lower than, and positively correlated to, baseline VL (P < 0.0001: mean VL reduction 0.77 log10, and r = 0.42, P = 0.004, respectively). CD4 LPRs to p24 increased significantly (P = 0.001) between day 0 of the first STI cycle and 4th STI but decreased thereafter. VL set point during final STI was significantly and negatively correlated with LPRs to p24 at both 2nd STI and 4th STI. Nevertheless, at week 52, 12 weeks after the end of the last STI, LPRs were weak and transient in all patients and were not correlated with VL set point. Moreover, the magnitude and breadth of HIV-1-specific CD8 T-cell responses increased significantly (P < 0.0001) between day 0 and week 52. The largest increases occurred during the final STI. Even though VL reached set point by week 12 of the final STI, HIV-1-specific CD8 T-cell responses did not stabilize but rather increased until the end of the follow-up and did not correlate with plasma VL (r = 0.01, P = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: STIs do not lead to control of viral replication in CHI patients, probably due to the fact that boosted CTL responses lack strong and durable helper T-cell responses. To reset the VL set point, new approaches that effectively augment and preserve helper T-cell responses should be investigated.

Predictors of tonsillar tissue HIV-1 viral burden at baseline and after 1 year of antiretroviral therapy.

In 81 antiretroviral-navie HIV-1 chronic-infected patients, we found a correlation among tonsillar tissue viral load, and virological and immunological measures in blood at baseline. No correlation was observed after 1 year of antiretroviral therapy. A protease inhibitor-containing regimen was the best predictor of good tonsillar tissue virological response.

Metabolic and immunological effects of antiretroviral agents in healthy individuals receiving post-exposure prophylaxis.

We have assessed metabolic and immunological effects of a nelfinavir-containing regimen in healthy HIV-1-uninfected individuals receiving post-exposure prophylaxis. Our data suggest that this regimen is well tolerated and did not modify the lipid or hepatic profiles. This antiretroviral regimen seems to have no effect on lymphocyte T cell subsets, however, it could have an immune-modulator role, inducing an increase in the proliferative responses to mitogens.

Immunological and virological factors at baseline may predict response to structured therapy interruption in early stage chronic HIV-1 infection.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to analyse which baseline factors could predict a favourable outcome after structured therapy interruption (STI). METHODS: Data of three Spanish pilot studies of STI in early stage chronic HIV-1-infected patients were analysed. A set of 37 variables at baseline was used. Plasma and tonsillar tissue viral load (VL), lymphocyte immunophenotyping and proliferative responses (LPR) to mitogens and specific antigens, and HIV-1 specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses were assessed at baseline. Response was defined as a VL set-point after 6 months off antiretroviral therapy after the last interruption of < 5000 copies/ml and 0.5 log(10) below baseline PVL before any antiretroviral therapy. RESULTS: After STI, the 44 patients were classified as follows: 18 (41%) as responders, 26 (59%) as non-responders. In the univariate analysis patients who responded had a significantly lower baseline level of CD4CD38 (P = 0.0068) and naive CD4 T cells (P = 0.03), and a higher level of memory CD4 T cells (P = 0.03) and proliferative response to tetanus toxoid (TT) (P = 0.01) and HIV-1 p24 (P = 0.03) than non-responders. A model incorporating five qualitative variables transformed according to the median value (CD4CD38, CD4 naive and memory T cells and stimulation index to TT and HIV-1 p24) at baseline could classify 97% of patients correctly (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A level of memory CD4 T cells and proliferative response to recall antigens above the median may predict a good response to STI, suggesting that preserved memory response in CD4 T cells is important factor.

Immunologic reconstitution after 1 year of highly active antiretroviral therapy, with or without protease inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of two triple antiretroviral combinations (2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTIs] + 1 protease inhibitors [PI] vs. 2 NRTIs + 1 nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor [NNRTI]) to correct T-cell subsets abnormalities and to restore immune functions in asymptomatic antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients with a baseline CD4 T-cell counts >500/mm3 and plasma viral load >5000 copies/mL. DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty randomized patients from 2 cohort studies receiving either stavudine (d4T) + lamivudine (3TC) + indinavir (n = 9), or d4T + didanosine (ddI) + nevirapine (NVP) (n = 11) were studied. Viral load, T-cell subsets and T-cell functions were analyzed at baseline and after 1 year of treatment. RESULTS: After 1 year of follow-up, the PI regimen was significantly more effective in reducing plasma and lymphoid tissue VL to undetectable levels. A significant increase in CD4+ T cells was observed in patients treated with PI (p =.0007) compared with those treated with NVP. Percentages of CD8+ T-cells and of activated CD8+ T-cells (CD38+ and DR+ as well as memory CD45RO+) decreased in all patients. An increase of the CD28+ subset of CD8+ T-cells also occurred in both groups of treatment. Naive T cells were maintained in the CD4+ subset and augmented in the CD8+ subset in all patients. In both PI and NVP groups, memory CD4+ T-cells increased significantly (p =.03). Peripheral blood mononuclear cell responsiveness to polyclonal stimuli and to tetanus toxoid and cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigen was similar in both groups of treatment. HIV-infected patients treated for 1 year with both triple combinations lacked significant T-cell responsiveness to HIV-1 proteins. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that immune reconstitution achieved after 1 year of therapy with PI-containing or PI-sparing regimens is similar, despite the higher effectiveness of PI-containing regimens in reducing viral load. Additional therapeutic approaches should be designed to restore HIV-1-specific responses.

Reflexiones acerca del abuso de antibióticos en España: el individuo frente a la colectividad / Thoughts about abuse of antibiotics in Spain: the individual against the collectivity

No disponible

Genotypic and phenotypic resistance patterns in early-stage HIV-1-infected patients failing initial therapy with stavudine, didanosine and nevirapine.

The objectives of this study were to determine the genotypic and phenotypic patterns of resistance in a group of early-stage antiretroviral-naive patients failing initial therapy with didanosine, stavudine and nevirapine. These patterns of resistance were determined at baseline and at time of virological failure in 89 antiretroviral-naive patients with CD4 cells >500 cells/ml and viral load >5000 copies/ml who received initial antiretroviral therapy with didanosine plus stavudine and nevirapine as part of the SCAN study, and who failed after having reached undetectable plasma levels (<200 copies/ml). Of the 89 patients recruited in the SCAN study, 14 (16%) developed a virological failure after reaching a viral load below 200 copies/ml after a median of 20 months of follow-up. At baseline, none of these 14 patients had genotypic resistance. At time of failure, six out of 14 (43%) failing patients had wild-type genotype and no phenotypic resistance. Suboptimal compliance could be documented in four of these six patients. Seven patients (50%) had nevirapine resistance mutations (mainly K103N [4/7], Y181C/I [2/7], G190A/S [2/7] and V108I [1/7]) associated with phenotypic high-level resistance to nevirapine, delavirdine and efavirenz (nevirapine >47.4- to 58.1-fold, delavirdine >74.4- to 168.9-fold and efavirenz >56.0- to 347.2-fold). Four of these seven patients also had thymidine analogue-associated mutations (TAM) (T215Y/F [2/4], M41L [1/4], D67N [2/4] and K70R [1/4]). Finally, one patient (7%) had exclusively TAM mutations (M41L). None of the patients developed mutations associated with didanosine resistance or phenotypic resistance to didanosine or stavudine. Suboptimal compliance or selection of nevirapine resistance often with TAM mutations was frequently associated with virological failure in a cohort of early-stage chronic HIV-1-infected patients treated with a protease inhibitor-sparing regimen.