RESUMO
Background: Mobile health (mHealth) systems are a promising alternative for rehabilitation of hip fracture, addressing constrained healthcare resources. Half of older adults fails to recover their pre-fracture routines, which imposes a burden on caregivers. We aimed to test the effectiveness of the 3-month ActiveHip + mHealth intervention on physical and psychological outcomes of older adults with hip fracture and their family caregivers. Methods: In a multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial conducted across 3 hospitals in Andalusia (Spain), patients older than 65 with a hip fracture, who were previously independent and lacked cognitive impairment were recruited alongside with their caregivers. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to the intervention group (ActiveHip+) or control (usual care) group. The intervention group underwent a 12-week health education and tele-rehabilitation programme through the ActiveHip + mHealth intervention. The primary outcome, physical performance, was assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery at three time points: at hospital discharge (baseline), 3-month after surgery (post intervention) and 1-year after surgery follow-up. Primary analyses of primary outcomes and safety data followed an intention-to-treat approach. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04859309. Findings: Between June 1st, 2021 and June 30th, 2022 data from 105 patients and their caregivers were analysed. Patients engaged in the ActiveHip + mHealth intervention (mean 7.11 points, SE 0.33) showed higher physical performance compared with patients allocated in the control group (mean 5.71 points, SE 0.32) at 3 months after surgery (mean difference in change from baseline 1.40 points, SE 0.36; puncorrected = 0.00011). These benefits were not maintained at 1-year after surgery follow-up (mean difference in change from baseline 0.19 points, SE 0.47; puncorrected = 0.68). No adverse events, including falls and refractures, were reported during the tele-rehabilitation sessions. At 3-months, the intervention group had 2 falls, compared to 4 in the control group, with no observed refractures. At the 1-year follow-up, the intervention group experienced 7 falls and 1 refracture, while the control group had 13 falls and 2 refractures. Interpretation: This study suggests that the ActiveHip + mHealth intervention may be effective for recovering physical performance in older adults with hip fracture. Importantly, the implementation of ActiveHip + into daily clinical practice may be feasible and has already been adopted in 18 hospitals, mostly in Spain but also in Belgium and Portugal. Thus, ActiveHip + could offer a promising solution when rehabilitation resources are limited. However, its dependence on caregiver support and the exclusion of participants with cognitive impairment makes it necessary to be cautious about its applicability. In addition, the non-maintenance of the effectiveness at 1-year follow-up highlights the need of refinement the ActiveHip + intervention to promote long-lasting behavioural changes. Funding: EIT Health and the Ramón y Cajal 2021 Excellence Research Grant action from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.
RESUMO
Telerehabilitation interventions administered via a smartphone may provide new feasible and effective rehabilitation options at home for patients with hip fracture. However, to date, no such interventions have been shown to be effective in the recovery key health outcomes of these patients. The present multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to test the effect of the ActiveHip+ m-Health system in the recovery of physical performance, functional level, quality of life, and other health-related outcomes in both patients with hip fracture and their family caregivers. A total of 104 patients older than 65 years, with hip fracture, and their family caregivers will be randomized into the ActiveHip+ rehabilitation (N = 52) or the control group (N = 52). ActiveHip+ is a 12-week smartphone-based rehabilitation program conducted in Granada and Cádiz (Spain) that includes: (1) 24 sessions of physical exercise and 12 sessions of occupational therapy; (2) seven educational modules for patients and for caregivers; and (3) general recommendations in activities of daily living. The control group will receive the usual rehabilitation protocol offered by the Andalusian Public Healthcare System. The primary outcome is the patient's physical performance, while the secondary outcomes are the patient's functional level, quality of life, pain, fear of falling, fitness perception, pre-fracture functional level, emotional status, and caregiver burden. The present project will substantially contribute to the existing knowledge by testing for the first time the efficacy and feasibility of a multidisciplinary m-Health system in the rehabilitation of patients with hip fracture.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Quadril , Telerreabilitação , Cuidadores , Educação em Saúde , Fraturas do Quadril/reabilitação , Humanos , Desempenho Físico Funcional , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Telerreabilitação/métodosRESUMO
Introducción. Tras un daño cerebral brusco se produce una pérdida de capacidades que afectan a la autonomía de la persona. La recuperación de las secuelas físicas, psíquicas y cognitivas requiere la aplicación de múltiples terapias cuyos resultados precisan una medición objetiva. Nuestro objetivo es analizar la aplicación de instrumentos estandarizados en la determinación de resultados terapéuticos en el daño cerebral adquirido. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio observacional descriptivo retrospectivo de 13 meses de duración. Analizamos datos epidemiológicos y clínicos: tiempo de evolución, grado de independencia (índice de Barthel), presencia de espasticidad y tratamiento con toxina botulínica. Como medida de resultados se usó la Goal Attainment Scaling y la Rehabilitation Complexity Scale, pre y postratamiento. Resultados. Revisamos un total de 45 pacientes, el 60% debido a un ictus. La espasticidad estaba presente en 19 pacientes, y el 42% fue tratado con infiltración de toxina botulínica. Todos realizaron tratamiento con planificación de objetivos; en el 84% de los casos se planificó más de un objetivo terapéutico, y el más prevalente fue la reeducación de la marcha. Con el uso de las escalas se observó que los pacientes con mayor complejidad inicial presentaban una mayor dificultad para lograr los objetivos establecidos, aunque existía un mayor grado de mejora en comparación con su estado previo. Conclusión. La situación de dependencia inicial y el grado de complejidad en las necesidades del paciente con daño cerebral se correlaciona con la situación final tras un programa de tratamiento neurorrehabilitador, de ahí la importancia del uso de escalas como la Goal Attainment Scaling y la Rehabilitation Complexity Scale pre y postratamiento (AU)
Introduction. Following sudden brain damage, there is a loss of capabilities that affects the persons autonomy. Recovery from the physical, psychic and cognitive sequelae requires the application of multiple therapies, the outcomes of which need to be measured objectively. Our aim is to analyse the application of standardised instruments in determining the therapeutic outcomes in acquired brain injury. Patients and methods. We conducted a retrospective descriptive observational study lasting 13 months. Both epidemiological and clinical data were analysed: elapsed time since onset, degree of independence (Barthel index), presence of spasticity and treatment with botulinum toxin. Outcomes were measured using Goal Attainment Scaling and the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale, pre- and post-treatment. Results. We reviewed a total of 45 patients, 60% of them having suffered a stroke. Spasticity was present in 19 patients, and 42% were treated with botulinum toxin infiltration. All of them underwent goal-setting treatment; in 84% of the cases more than one goal was planned, and the most prevalent was gait re-education. With the use of the scales it was observed that the patients with the greatest initial complexity had more difficulty to achieve the goals that had been set, although there was a higher degree of improvement in comparison to their prior status. Conclusion. The initial situation in terms of dependence and the degree of complexity of the needs of patients with brain damage correlate with the final situation after a programme of neurorehabilitation therapy. This reflects the importance of using scales like Goal Attainment Scaling and the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale, pre- and post-treatment (AU)
