The effects of proton pump inhibition on patient-reported severity of dyspepsia when receiving dual anti-platelet therapy with clopidogrel and low-dose aspirin: analysis from the Clopidogrel and the Optimization of Gastrointestinal Events Trial.

BACKGROUND: Dual anti-platelet therapy with clopidogrel and low-dose aspirin increases the risk for gastrointestinal clinical events. Omeprazole has been shown to significantly reduce these events without compromising cardiovascular safety in patients treated with dual anti-platelet therapy. Whether or not omeprazole improves patient-reported outcomes is undetermined. AIM: To assess the impact of prophylactic omeprazole with background dual anti-platelet therapy on patient-reported symptoms of dyspepsia compared to placebo. METHODS: We analysed results of the Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment questionnaires collected in the Clopidogrel and the Optimization of Gastrointestinal Events Trial. RESULTS: Patient-reported outcome data from 3759 subjects were available for analysis. At 4 weeks, the mean scores of pain intensity and nonpain symptoms were lower in the omeprazole group (5.61 ± 0.17 vs. 6.40 ± 0.17, P = 0.001, and 10.61 ± 0.07 vs. 11.00 ± 0.07, P < 0.001 respectively). These differences were maintained at 24 weeks (5.91 ± 0.35 vs. 7.10 ± 0.37, P = 0.020 for pain intensity; 10.36 ± 0.12 vs. 10.93 ± 0.13, P = 0.001 for nonpain symptoms). After adjusting for covariates there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the percent of patients with dyspepsia during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to reducing the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, statistically significant benefits with prophylactic omeprazole use on both pain and nonpain symptoms were evident at 4 weeks and sustained through 24 weeks. The clinical significance of these overall results is unclear, but greater in patients with pain at baseline.

The economics of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a US managed-care setting: a retrospective, claims-based analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess 12-month healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding events. METHODS: Patients hospitalized with a UGI bleeding event were identified in US national health-plan claims data (1999-2003) and propensity matched to control patients without UGI bleeding in the same health plan. Matching criteria included age, gender, index date, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, geographic region, and prior medical utilization. RESULTS: A total of 9,033 UGI-bleed patients and 579,018 control patients met the inclusion criteria, yielding 4,651 matched pairs. After matching, differences between the UGI bleed and general population cohorts remained for office visits, ER visits, and ER costs during the 6-month baseline period prior to the index date. During the 12 months following the index date, both UGI-related healthcare utilization and total healthcare, medical, and pharmacy costs incurred by the UGI-bleed cohort were significantly greater (p< 0.0001) than those incurred by the general population cohort (mean of $20,405 vs. 3,652), even after excluding the initial hospitalization costs (mean of $11,228 vs. 3,652). Costs were primarily due to inpatient hospitalizations (mean of $13,059 for the UGI-bleed cohort vs. $729 for the general population cohort) and ambulatory services (mean of $4,037 for the UGI-bleed cohort vs. $1,537 for the general population cohort). Sixteen percent of the UGI-bleed cohort had a GI-related hospitalization, and about 40% of total costs occurred after the initial hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with UGI bleeds experienced significantly higher (p< 0.0001) 12-month health-resource utilization and costs than patients without UGI bleeds. This study provides empirical evidence of the long-term economic burden associated with UGI bleeding. Interpretation of the results should take into account the lack of available information in claims data that could have an effect on study outcomes, such as particular clinical and disease-specific parameters that are not mitigated by propensity score and comorbidity index matching. In addition, this study is limited by the intensive demographic matching that was done between the two cohorts, which may have eliminated the sickest UGI patients and the healthiest general health-plan population patients.

Barriers to nuclease Bal31 digestion across specific sites in simian virus 40 chromatin.

A portion of the nucleoprotein containing viral DNA extracted from cells infected by simian virus (SV40) is preferentially cleaved by endonucleases in a region of the genome encompassing the origin of replication and early and late promoters. To explore this nuclease-sensitive structure, we cleaved SV40 chromatin molecules with restriction enzymes and digested the exposed termini with nuclease Bal31. Digestion proceeded only a short distance in the late direction from the MspI site, but some molecules were degraded 400 to 500 base pairs in the early direction. By comparison, BglI-cleaved chromatin was digested for only a short distance in the early direction, but some molecules were degraded 400 to 450 base pairs in the late direction. These barriers to Bal31 digestion (bracketing the BglI and the MspI sites) define the borders of the same open region in SV40 chromatin that is preferentially digested by DNase I and other endonucleases. In a portion of the SV40 chromatin, Bal31 could not digest through the nuclease-sensitive region and reached barriers after digesting only 50 to 100 base pairs from one end or the other. Chromatin molecules that contain barriers in the BglI to MspI region are physically distinct from molecules that are open in this region as evidenced by partial separation of the two populations on sucrose density gradients.