Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 64(28): 763-6, 2015 Jul 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26203630

RESUMO

On March 22, 2015, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) was notified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of four cases of suspected acute methyl bromide toxicity among family members vacationing at a condominium resort in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Methyl bromide is a pesticide that has been banned in the United States for use in homes and other residential settings. An investigation conducted by the U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Health (VIDOH), the U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR), and EPA confirmed that methyl bromide had been used as a fumigant on March 18 in the building where the family had been residing, 2 days before they were transported to the hospital; three family members had life-threatening illness. On March 25, 2015, a stop-use order for methyl bromide was issued by DPNR to the pest control company that had performed the fumigation. Subsequent investigation revealed that previous fumigation with methyl bromide had occurred on October 20, 2014, at the same condominium resort. In addition to the four ill family members, 37 persons who might have been exposed to methyl bromide as a result of the October 2014 or March 2015 fumigations were identified by VIDOH and ATSDR. Standardized health questionnaires were administered to 16 of the 20 persons for whom contact information was available; six of 16 had symptoms consistent with methyl bromide exposure, including headache and fatigue. Pest control companies should be aware that use of methyl bromide is banned in homes and other residential settings, and clinicians should be aware of the toxicologic syndrome that exposure to methyl bromide can cause.


Assuntos
Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Fumigação/efeitos adversos , Habitação , Hidrocarbonetos Bromados/toxicidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adolescente , Adulto , Análise por Conglomerados , Feminino , Fumigação/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ilhas Virgens Americanas , Adulto Jovem
2.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 8(10): 1083-7, 2002 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12396920

RESUMO

On November 11, 2001, following the bioterrorism-related anthrax attacks, the U.S. Postal Service collected samples at the Southern Connecticut Processing and Distribution Center; all samples were negative for Bacillus anthracis. After a patient in Connecticut died from inhalational anthrax on November 19, the center was sampled again on November 21 and 25 by using dry and wet swabs. All samples were again negative for B. anthracis. On November 28, guided by information from epidemiologic investigation, we sampled the site extensively with wet wipes and surface vacuum sock samples (using HEPA vacuum). Of 212 samples, 6 (3%) were positive, including one from a highly contaminated sorter. Subsequently B. anthracis was also detected in mail-sorting bins used for the patient's carrier route. These results suggest cross-contaminated mail as a possible source of anthrax for the inhalational anthrax patient in Connecticut. In future such investigations, extensive sampling guided by epidemiologic data is imperative.


Assuntos
Antraz/microbiologia , Bacillus anthracis/isolamento & purificação , Monitoramento Ambiental , Contaminação de Equipamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Postais , Esporos Bacterianos/isolamento & purificação , Antraz/epidemiologia , Connecticut/epidemiologia , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Humanos , Exposição por Inalação , Exposição Ocupacional
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...