Observational study to evaluate discontinuation of monotherapy with cobicistat-boosted darunavir in patients with human immunodeficiency virus.

To evaluate the reasons for changing to monotherapy with protease inhibitors, together with the proportion and reasons for the interruption to treatment, in patients who have been treated at some point with cobicistat-boosted darunavir (DRV/c). Outpatients in a tertiary hospital. Observational retrospective study to evaluate monotherapy with DRV/c (800 mg/150 mg) in adult patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection, from December 2014 to July 2022. Demographic variables, viral load, cluster of differentiation 4 lymphocyte lymphocyte count, and antiretroviral therapy were assessed. 42 patients were included. 36% of the patients were undergoing monotherapy at the time of the analysis. The main reason for discontinuation was poor adherence. At time of analysis, 80% of the patients in monotherapy had an undetectable viral load. Antiretroviral therapy recommendations advise against exposing the patient to functional monotherapy with a single drug due to the high risk of virological failure and the onset of resistance to a single drug. Following the analysis of the results, DRV/c in monotherapy is not an effective strategy in the medium and long term due to factors such as lack of adherence or virological failure, although it can be maintained in specific circumstances. Therefore, patients undergoing monotherapy require close monitoring.

Oral Ribavirin for Treatment of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Lung Transplantation Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) can cause severe respiratory infection and is a risk factor for development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) in patients who have undergone lung transplantation (LT). The treatment options are limited in this population. We assessed the efficacy of oral administration for the treatment of RSV infection after LT. METHODS: A retrospective case-control was conducted in LT patients who documented RSV infection. Demographic, clinical, and efficacy variables (resolution infection, recovery of lung function, incidence of BOS, mortality) was compared between the oral ribavirin (RBV) group and the control group. RESULTS: Thirty-six LT patients were included (19 RBV group, 17 control group). Significant differences were found for age, sex and coinfections. However, no differences of immunosuppressive level and baseline forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV1) were found. RSV clearance was evident in 5 patients (26.3%) of the RBV group vs 2 patients (11.8%) in the control group (odds ratio [OR], 0.37; P = .282). At 3 months, FEV1 remained stable in 12 patients (80%) of the RBV group vs 13 patients (81.3%) of the control group (OR, 0.92; P = .321). At 6 months, FEV1 remained stable in 11 patients (73.3%) of the RBV group and 12 patients (75%) of the control group (OR, 1.25; P = .779), and BOS appeared in 6 patients (31.6%) vs 4 patients (23.5%) of the control group (OR, 1.50; P = .591). Mortality rates were 26% (5 patients) in the RBV group vs 29.4% (5 patients) in the control group (OR, 1.40; P = .637). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in efficacy parameters were found between groups; however, stabilization without worsening of respiratory function was observed at 3 and 6 months. Because of the variability in the treatment regimen and the heterogeneity of groups, a protocol was developed to standardize and evaluate the use of oral RBV as treatment for RSV in LT.