RESUMO
Background. Melanoma incidence is increasing faster than any other cancer in the UK. The introduction of specialist skin cancer multidisciplinary teams intends to improve the provision of care to patients suffering from melanoma. This study aims to investigate the management and survival of patients diagnosed with melanoma around the time of inception of the regional skin cancer multidisciplinary team both to benchmark the service against published data and to enable future analysis of the impact of the specialisation of skin cancer care. Methods. All patients diagnosed with primary cutaneous melanoma between January 1, 2003 and December 3, 2005 were identified. Data on clinical and histopathological features, surgical procedures, complications, disease recurrence and 5-year survival were collected and analysed. Results. Two hundred and fourteen patients were included, 134 female and 80 males. Median Breslow thickness was 0.74 mm (0.7 mm female and 0.8 mm male). Overall 5-year survival was 88% (90% female and 85% male). Discussion. Melanoma incidence in Buckinghamshire is in keeping with published data. Basic demographics details concur with classic melanoma distribution and more recent trends, with increased percentage of superficial spreading and thin melanomas, leading to improved survival are reflected.
RESUMO
Surgical excision remains the gold standard for the management of cutaneous squamous cell cancers (SCC) and national guidelines for operative radial margins predict 95% oncological clearance with a margin of 4 mm for low-risk and 6 mm for high-risk tumours. We retrospectively analysed all cutaneous SCC excisions performed across 4 regional Plastic surgical units in England over a consecutive 24-month period and collected data on tumour characteristics, operative and histological margins and completeness of excision. We identified 633 eligible SCC excisions of which 265 (42%) were over 2 cm in diameter with 37 recurrent tumours (5.8%). The mean radial operative margin was 6.5 mm across all tumours and 8.4 mm for tumours greater than 2 cm. The mean histological tumour diameter was 21 mm. The overall incomplete excision rate was 7.6% (7.9% for tumours >2 cm). Ninety-four percent (45/48) of incomplete excisions involved the deep margin and only 3 out of 633 excisions (0.47%) were incomplete at a radial margin only. No differences were observed in tumour size or excision margin between incompletely and completely excised tumours. Incomplete excisions were most common on the ear, nose and cheek. In summary our analysis demonstrates that despite adherence to recommended surgical margins for cutaneous SCCs the incomplete excision rate remains higher than expected. We believe that this is because most incomplete excisions are incomplete at the deep margin and question the utility of performing increasingly wide excisions, and, the generalisability of the evidence upon which recommendations for radial margins are based.
