RESUMO
Primary nonfunction (PNF) is a life-threatening complication of liver transplantation (LT), but in the early postoperative period, it can be difficult to differentiate from early allograft dysfunction (EAD). The aim of this study was to determine if serum biomarkers can distinguish PNF from EAD in the initial 48 h following LT. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of adult patients that underwent LT between January 2010 and April 2020 was performed. Clinical parameters, absolute values and trends of C-reactive protein (CRP), blood urea, creatinine, liver function tests, platelets, and international normalized ratio in the initial 48 h after LT were compared between the EAD and PNF groups. Results: There were 1937 eligible LTs, with PNF and EAD occurring in 38 (2%) and 503 (26%) patients, respectively. A low serum CRP and urea were associated with PNF. CRP was able to differentiate between the PNF and EAD on postoperative day (POD)1 (20 versus 43 mg/L; P < 0.001) and POD2 (24 versus 77; P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of POD2 CRP was 0.770 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.645-0.895). The urea value on POD2 (5.05 versus 9.0 mmol/L; P = 0.002) and trend of POD2:1 ratio (0.71 versus 1.32 mmol/L; P < 0.001) were significantly different between the groups. The AUROC of the change in urea from POD1 to 2 was 0.765 (95% CI 0.645-0.885). Aspartate transaminase was significantly different between the groups, with an AUROC of 0.884 (95% CI 0.753-1.00) on POD2. Discussion: The biochemical profile immediately following LT can distinguish PNF from EAD; CRP, urea, and aspartate transaminase are more effective than ALT and bilirubin in distinguishing PNF from EAD in the initial postoperative 48 h. Clinicians should consider the values of these markers when making treatment decisions.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study analysed whether local anaesthetic wound catheter infiltration (LA-WCI) as an adjunct to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) provides superior outcomes compared to IV-PCA alone following liver resection. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted for randomised control trials (RCTs) comparing LA-WCI with IV-PCA(LA-WCI group) versus IV-PCA alone (IV-PCA group). PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles. RESULTS: Six RCTs with a total of 440 patients were included. Opioid use in the initial 48 h was less in the LA-WCI group [MD -21.27 mg (-39.39,-3.15), p = 0.02]. Pain scores were lower in the LA-WCI group at rest at POD0 (post-operative day 0)6-8 h (p = 0.0009), POD1AM(p = 0.01), POD1PM(p = 0.02) and POD2 (p = 0.0006), and exertion at POD0 0-2 h (p = 0.05), POD1AM(p = 0.03), POD1PM(p = 0.03), POD2 (p = 0.03) and POD3 (p = 0.01). LA-WCI group had reduced length of hospital stay [MD -1.32 days (-2.23,-0.40),p = 0.005], time to ambulation [MD -5.94 h (-8.47,-3.42),p = 0.00001] and incidence of nausea and vomiting (PONV) [OR 0.17 (0.07,0.43),p = 0.0002]. No differences were observed in length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay or incidence of surgical site infections. DISCUSSION: LA-WCI as an adjunct to opiate IV-PCA post-hepatectomy reduces opioid use, pain scores at multiple time points at rest and exertion, length of hospital stay, time to ambulation and PONV. However, LA-WCI use does not alter length of ICU stay or incidence of wound infection.
