Assessment of communication and physical exam skills: A comparison of students, faculty and standardized patients.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: The objective of this retrospective study was twofold: it aimed to investigate dental students' communication and physical exam self-assessment skills by comparing students' self-evaluations with those completed by faculty and standardized patients (SPs). Second, it aimed to compare faculty and SPs assessment of students' communication skills. METHODS: At the end of their first year of training, students (n = 127), participated in one SP encounter about an initial dental consultation. Students completed self-assessment before receiving feedback from faculty (n = 19) and SPs (n = 19). The data source included evaluation forms submitted by students, faculty and SPs. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the overall scores between groups. Agreement between evaluations items were analyzed with McNemar's test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in how students and faculty graded for either communication (p = 0.6724) or physical exam (p = 0.1921) skills. However, both students and faculty provided less favorable marks than SPs for communication skills with a statistically significant difference in the overall grading between both students and SPs (p = 0.0146) and between faculty and SPs (p = 0.0045). CONCLUSIONS: While there was disagreement between students and faculty versus SPs, they weren't meaningful differences in scores and the dissimilarities mainly consisted of ratings of explanation skills. We suggest that, when applicable, dental student's self-evaluations may represent an alternative to faculty assessments of communication and physical exam skills. Nonetheless, we recommend that SPs be included in the assessment of communication skills to provide students with comprehensive feedback that more realistically represents the natural patient-provider relationship.

Biological significance of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in oral epithelial dysplasia and oral squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the levels of 5-hydroxylmethylcytosine (5-hmC) in oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) compared with those in benign, reactive inflammatory lesions and to explore whether DNA hydroxymethylation may serve as a novel biomarker for early diagnosis and prognosis of OSCC. STUDY DESIGN: The study included normal mucosa from uninvolved margins of 9 fibromas, 10 oral lichen planus, 15 OED, and 23 OSCC. Cultured human keratinocyte lines from benign oral mucosa, OED, and OSCC, as well as a murine model in which OSCC was induced with 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide, were also evaluated. RESULTS: Progressive loss of 5-hmC from benign oral mucosal lesions to OED and OSCC was documented in patient samples. Decreased levels in 5-hmC that typify OED and OSCC were also detectable in human cell lines. Moreover, we characterized similar alterations in 5-hmC in an animal model of OED/OSCC. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that 5-hmC distinguishes OED and OSCC from benign lesions with high sensitivity and specificity. Consequently, loss of 5-hmC may be useful for the diagnosis of OED with potential implications for therapy of OSCC.