Antiphospholipid syndrome: antibodies to Domain 1 of ß2-glycoprotein 1 correctly classify patients at risk.

BACKGROUND: Determination of lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL) and ß2-Glycoprotein 1 (aß2GP1) antibodies is mandatory to classify patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) into risk categories. OBJECTIVES: To measure relevant antibodies, considered to be those of the IgG isotype directed towards ß2GP1 and particularly those directed to Domain 1 (Dm1) of the molecule. PATIENTS/METHODS: In this cross-sectional study we measured IgG aß2GP1-Dm1 by a chemiluminescent immunoassay in a group of individuals initially positive for IgG aß2GP1 and classified as triple (LAC+, IgG aCL+, IgG aß2GP1+, n = 32), double (LAC-, IgG aCL+, IgG aß2GP1+, n = 23) or single positive (LA-, IgG aCL-, IgG aß2GP1+, n = 10). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Geometric mean and standard deviation expressed as chemiluminescent units (CU) in triple, double and single positive groups were 273.0 ± 6.2, 18.2 ± 9.6 and 4.4 ± 2.2, respectively. The geometric mean obtained in 40 healthy subjects was 2.0 ± 2.0. Mean CU values were significantly different among groups and with respect to values found in 40 healthy subjects (P < 0.0001). Positive values of IgG aß2GP1-Dm1 (above 14.2 CU) were found in 45 individuals while 20 individuals (20/65 = 30.8%) positive for IgG aß2GP1 were negative for IgG aß2GPI-Dm1. There was a significant association between positive IgG aß2GP1-Dm1 and thromboembolic events (P = 0.001). Positive and negative values of IgG aß2GP1-Dm1 were consistently confirmed after 12 weeks, with only three low positive values being negative after 12 weeks. In conclusion, IgG aß2GP1-Dm1 seems a robust and reproducible test that in association with the classic tests may be useful in clinical practice in identifying individuals at high risk of developing thromboembolic events.

Confirmation of initial antiphospholipid antibody positivity depends on the antiphospholipid antibody profile.

BACKGROUND: The revised classification criteria for the antiphospholipid syndrome state that antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies (lupus anticoagulant [LAC] and/or anticardiolipin [aCL] and/or anti-ß2 -glycoprotein I [aß2 GPI] antibodies) should be detected on two or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart. Consequently, classification of patient risk and adequacy of treatment may be deferred by 3 months. OBJECTIVES: In order to early classify patient risk, we evaluated whether aPL positivity confirmation is related to aPL antibody profiles. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients referred to our center who were initially positive in one or more tests exploring the presence of aPL were tested after 3 months. During a 4-year period, 225 patients were initially positive in one or more tests, and 161 were available for confirmation after 3 months. Patients were classified as triple-positive (n = 54: LAC(+) , aCL(+) , aß2 GPI(+) , same isotype), double-positive (n = 50: LAC(-) , aCL(+) , aß2 GPI(+) , same isotype) and single-positive (n = 53: LAC or aCL or aß2 GPI antibodies as the sole positive test). RESULTS: Among subjects with triple positivity at initial testing, 98% (53 of 54) had their aPL profile confirmed after 12 weeks. The double-positive and single-positive groups had data confirmed in 42 of 50 (84%) and 23 of 57 (40%) subjects, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that high-risk subjects with triple-positive aPL profiles are identified early, at the time of the initial screening tests.

Circulating ß2 glycoprotein I-IgG anti-ß2 glycoprotein I immunocomplexes in patients with definite antiphospholipid syndrome.

Beta2-glycoprotein I (ß(2)GPI), a relevant antigen in Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS), binds anionic macromolecules including heparin (Hep). A possible formation of ternary complexes between ß(2)GPI, antibodies and Hep in APS is thus possible. The aim of this study was to evaluate Hep-ß(2)GPI interaction in patients with APS. The affinity of Heps of different length, including unfractionated Hep (UFH), low-molecular weight Hep (enoxaparin) and pentasaccharide (fondaparinux), to human ß(2)GPI was estimated by fluorescence spectroscopy, yielding dissociation constant (K(d)) values of 1.1, 24.0 and 89.4 µM, demonstrating that the longer UFH binds to ß(2)GPI far more tightly than the shorter ones. Plasma and protein G-purified IgGs from eight patients with APS (i.e. five with thromboembolic disease and three with catastrophic APS), were fractionated by affinity chromatography using a Hep (UFH)-bound column, eluted with a linear NaCl gradient. For each chromatographic analysis, fractions were collected in the whole NaCl gradient and tested by ELISA for the presence of ß(2)GPI and anti-ß(2)GPI IgG. The results of Hep-affinity chromatography and ELISAs concurrently indicate that either ß(2)GPI and anti-ß(2)GPI IgG elute from the Hep column in the same chromatographic peak, at a retention time identical to that of the purified, isolated ß(2)GPI, thus suggesting that circulating immunocomplexes containing ß(2)GPI are present in patients with APS.

[Clinical value of antibodies to lysobisphosphatidic acid in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome]. / Significato clinico degli anticorpi anti acido lisobisfosfatidico nei pazienti con sindrome da antifosfolipidi primaria.

To assess the clinical value of anti-lysobisphosphatidic acid (anti-LBPA) antibodies in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), the sera of 140 primary APS patients were tested and compared with those of 70 control subjects affected with rheumatic systemic diseases (n. 24) or autoimmune thyroiditis (n. 46). Anti-LBPA anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta2 Glycoprotein I (anti-beta2GPI) antibodies were determined using a "home made" ELISA method. Lupus anticoagulant (LA) was assessed using a series of clotting tests in accordance with the literature. IgG anti-LBPA was significantly prevalent in primary APS (p=0.000) with a sensitivity of 58.6% and a specificity of 92.9%. IgM anti-LBPA showed a significant frequency in primary APS (p=0.000) with a sensitivity of 28.6% and a specificity of 97.1%. Anti-LBPA's sensitivity and specificity for APS were lower or equal to those of aCL and anti-beta2GPI. The prevalence of anti-LBPA in the different clinical and laboratory subsets of APS was lower than those of aCL and anti-beta2GPI. It is interesting to observe that both IgG and IgM anti-LBPA were never found alone. The comparison between anti-LBPA and LA showed that the former had a higher sensitivity but a lower specificity. In conclusion, in view of our results anti-LBPA cannot at present be considered a further tool to be utilized to diagnose APS and to differentiate the different clinical and laboratory subsets of this disease.

[Confirmation of antiphospholipid antibody positivity: a year's results in a cohort of 113 patients]. / Conferma della positività nell'autoimmunità antifosfolipidica: risultati acquisiti in un anno in una coorte di 113 pazienti.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the confirmation rate of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), to analyze their behaviour at confirmation time, and to study the clinical value of their confirmation. METHODS: Blood samples from 380 subjects, enrolled in this study from June 1, 2007 to May 31, 2008, were tested for anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta2glycoprotein (abeta2GPI) antibodies using an ELISA method and for Lupus anticoagulant (LA) using a series of clotting tests. The samples of the 113 subjects resulting positive at the first testing time were assayed again to confirm antiphospholipid positivity. RESULTS: aPL positivity was confirmed in 67 out of the 113 subjects (59.3%). Medium-high antibody levels of all, except IgM aCL, aPL/ELISA had a significantly higher confirmation rate with respect to that in subjects with low levels. The confirmation rate in the category I antibody patients (multiple positivity) was higher than that in the category II antibody subjects (single positivity). LA positivity was confirmed only when it was associated to other aPL. The cut-off of 40 GPL produced a confirmation rate equal to that resulting from a 99th percentile cut-off. Confirmation of aPL positivity made it possible for us to confirm the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in 8 out of the 113 subjects originally resulting positive (7.1%). APS clinical features were vascular thrombosis in 4 of these and pregnancy morbidity in the other 4. CONCLUSIONS: Our data emphasize aPL positivity confirmation selectivity, and medium-high antibody levels and category I antibodies (multiple positivity) had the best confirmation rates.

Laboratory and clinical features of pregnant women with antiphospholipid syndrome and neonatal outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between the antiphospholipid profile and clinical characteristics of pregnant women with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and neonatal outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively considered 109 treated pregnancies of 93 patients with primary APS and reviewed the medical records of their 111 infants. Neonatal outcome was assessed using the following variables: weeks of gestational age at delivery, percentiles of birth weight, Apgar score at 5 minutes, need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the delivery room, time in the neonatal intensive care unit, infections, and other neonatal complications. Univariate statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between APS maternal features and neonatal outcome parameters. RESULTS: When maternal APS features and variables of infant outcome were analyzed, it was evident that lupus anticoagulant (LAC), triple antiphospholipid positivity, and history of vascular thrombosis were significantly associated with some parameters of a poor infant outcome. History of pregnancy morbidity alone was, instead, significantly correlated to the variables of favorable neonatal outcome. CONCLUSION: There seems to be more than one kind of pregnant woman with APS. Even when treated with a second-line therapy plan, mothers with LAC and/or triple antiphospholipid positivity and/or previous thromboembolism seem to have a high probability of poor neonatal outcome, whereas those with pregnancy morbidity alone, treated with conventional drugs, seem to have a high probability of favorable outcome.