Simvastatin therapy in higher dosages deteriorates bone quality: Consistent evidence from population-wide patient data and interventional mouse studies.

BACKGROUND: Combining mouse experiments with big data analysis of the Austrian population, we investigated the association between high-dose statin treatment and bone quality. METHODS: The bone microarchitecture of the femur and vertebral body L4 was measured in male and ovariectomized female mice on a high-fat diet containing simvastatin (1.2 g/kg). A sex-specific matched big data analysis of Austrian health insurance claims using multiple logistic regression models was conducted (simvastatin 60-80 mg/day vs. controls; males: n = 138,666; females: n = 155,055). RESULTS: High-dose simvastatin impaired bone quality in male and ovariectomized mice. In the trabecular femur, simvastatin reduced bone volume (µm3: ♂, 213 ± 15 vs. 131 ± 7, p < 0.0001; ♀, 66 ± 7 vs. 44 ± 5, p = 0.02) and trabecular number (1/mm: ♂, 1.88 ± 0.09 vs. 1.27 ± 0.06, p < 0.0001; ♀, 0.60 ± 0.05 vs. 0.43 ± 0.04, p = 0.01). In the cortical femur, bone volume (mm3: ♂, 1.44 ± 0.03 vs. 1.34 ± 0.03, p = 0.009; ♀, 1.33 ± 0.03 vs. 1.12 ± 0.03, p = 0.0002) and cortical thickness were impaired (µm: ♂, 211 ± 4 vs. 189 ± 4, p = 0.0004; ♀, 193 ± 3 vs. 169 ± 3, p < 0.0001). Similar impairments were found in vertebral body L4. Simvastatin-induced changes in weight or glucose metabolism were excluded as mediators of deteriorations in bone quality. Results from mice were supported by a matched cohort analysis showing an association between high-dose simvastatin and increased risk of osteoporosis in patients (♂, OR: 5.91, CI: 3.17-10.99, p < 0.001; ♀, OR: 4.16, CI: 2.92-5.92, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: High-dose simvastatin dramatically reduces bone quality in obese male and ovariectomized female mice, suggesting that direct drug action accounts for the association between high dosage and increased risk of osteoporosis as observed in comparable human cohorts. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms behind this relationship are presently unknown and require further investigation.

The impact of antiplatelet and antithrombotic regimen after TAVI: Data from the VIenna CardioThOracic Aortic Valve RegistrY (VICTORY).

BACKGROUND: We compared the outcomes and adverse events of TAVI patients based on the discharge and long-term antiplatelet or anticoagulant treatment regimens (single antiplatelet [SAPT] vs. dual antiplatelet [DAPT] vs. anticoagulation [OAC] vs. no treatment [NT]). METHODS: The outcome of 532 consecutive patients treated with TAVI was evaluated. As the main study endpoint, the 1-year all-cause mortality was chosen to compare the different discharge treatment regimens and the 3-year all-cause mortality to compare the different long-term treatment regimens. The secondary endpoints were adverse events as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-II. RESULTS: One-year survival after TAVI was highest amongst patients treated with DAPT compared to SAPT (P < .001) and OAC (P = .003), and patients under OAC demonstrated improved 1-year survival over patients treated with SAPT (P = .006). Furthermore, there was a strong trend towards improved 3-year survival for patients in the OAC cohort treated with non-vitamin K antagonists compared to vitamin K antagonists (N-VKAs vs. VKA; log-rank P = .056). CONCLUSION: The lower all-cause mortality for DAPT within the first year and N-VKAs over VKA within the first 3 years warrant considerable attention in further recommendations of antithrombotic and anticoagulation regimens after TAVI.