Silicone-covered biodegradable magnesium-stent insertion in the esophagus: a comparison with plastic stents.

BACKGROUND: We determined the feasibility of, and tissue response to silicone-covered biodegradable magnesium- and plastic-stent insertion into the esophagus in rabbits. METHODS: The mechanical compression-recovery characteristics and degradation behaviors of the magnesium stent were investigated in vitro. A total of 45 rabbits were randomly divided into a magnesium- (n = 15) and a plastic- (n = 15) stent group, and underwent stent insertion into the lower third of the esophagus under fluoroscopic guidance; a control group (n = 15) did not undergo the intervention. Esophagography was performed at 1, 2, and 4 weeks. Five rabbits in each group were euthanized at each time point for histological examination. RESULTS: Silicone-covered magnesium stents showed similar radial force to plastic stents (p > 0.05). The magnesium stents degraded rapidly in an acidic solution, but 90.2% ± 3.1% of the residual mass was maintained after a 2-week degradation in a solution with a pH of 4.0. All stent insertions were well tolerated. Magnesium stents migrated in six rabbits (one at 1 week, one at 2 weeks and four at 4 weeks), and plastic stents migrated in three rabbits (one at 2 weeks and two at 4 weeks; p > 0.05). Esophageal wall remodeling (thinner epithelial and smooth muscle layers) was similar in both stented groups (p > 0.05), and the esophagus wall was found to be significantly thinner in the stented groups than in the control group (p < 0.05). Esophageal injury and collagen deposition following stent insertion were similar and did not differ from the control group (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal silicone-covered magnesium stents provided reliable support for at least 2 weeks, with acceptable migration rates and without causing severe injury or tissue reaction compared with plastic stents.

Technical feasibility and tissue reaction after silicone-covered biodegradable magnesium stent insertion in the oesophagus: a primary study in vitro and in vivo.

OBJECTIVES: Determine the feasibility of and tissue response to biodegradable magnesium-silicone stent insertion into the oesophagus of rabbits. METHODS: Mechanical compression-recovery and degradation behaviours of the stents were investigated in vitro. Thirty rabbits were randomly divided into a magnesium-silicone stent group (n = 15) that received stent insertion into the lower 1/3 of the oesophagus under fluoroscopic guidance and a control group (n = 15). Oesophagography was performed at 1, 2 and 4 weeks. Five rabbits in each group were euthanized at each time point for histological examination. RESULTS: Magnesium-silicone stents showed good flexibility and elasticity, and degraded more slowly than bare stents at pH 4.0 and 7.4. All stent insertions were well tolerated. The oesophageal diameters at 1, 2 and 4 weeks were 9.7 ± 0.7, 9.6 ± 0.8 and 9.6 ± 0.5 mm, respectively (vs. 9.2 ± 0.8 mm before intervention; P > 0.05). Stent migration occurred in six rabbits (one at 1 week, one at 2 and four at 4). Microscopy demonstrated dilation of the oesophageal wall within 1 week of insertion. Oesophageal injury and collagen deposition following stent insertion were similar to control (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Oesophageal magnesium-silicone stent insertion was feasible and provided reliable support for 2 weeks without causing oesophageal injury or collagen deposition. KEY POINTS: • Mg stent provided apparently adequate radial force and silicone membrane reduced magnesium biodegradation • Stent insertion provided good support for at least 2 weeks before biodegradation • Stenting effectively resulted in oesophageal wall remodelling, without demonstrable injury.

Temporary placement of a paclitaxel or rapamycin-eluting stent is effective to reduce stenting induced inflammatory reaction and scaring in benign cardia stricture models.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To investigate whether temporary placement of a paclitaxel or rapamycin eluting stent is more effective to reduce stenting induced inflammatory reaction and scaring than a bared stent in benign cardia stricture models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty dog models of stricture were randomly divided into a control group (CG, n=20, no stent insertion), a bare stent group (BSG, n=20), a paclitaxel eluting (Pacl-ESG, n=20) and a rapamycin eluting stent group (Rapa-ESG, n=20), with one-week stent retention. Lower-oesophageal-sphincter pressure (LOSP), 5-minute barium height (5-mBH) and cardia diameter were assessed before, immediately after the procedure, and regularly for 6 months. Five dogs in each group were euthanized for histological examination at each follow-up assessment. RESULTS: Stent insertion was well tolerated, with similar migration rates in three groups. At 6 months, LOSP and 5-mBH improved in Pacl-ESG and Rapa-ESG compared to BSG (p<0.05), with no difference between Pacl-ESG and Rapa-ESG (p>0.05). Cardia kept more patency in the Pacl-ESG and Rapa-ESG than in BSG (p<0.05). Reduced peak inflammatory reactions and scarring occurred in the Pacl-ESG and Rapa-ESG compared to BSG (p<0.05), with a similar outcome in the Pacl-ESG and Rapa-ESG (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel or rapamycin-eluting stents insertion led to better outcomes than bare stents in benign cardia stricture models.