RESUMO
Objective To assess Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire in the principle of Chinese civilization and Traditional Medicine characteristics (C-MLHF). Methods A survey was con- ducted in 124 heart failure ( HF) patients using C-MLHF and Minnesota living with heart failure question- naire (MLHF). Reliability, validity, feasibility, and the correlation of New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification was compared between the two questionnaires. Results The recovery of C-MLHF was 95. 2% (118/124) ,the effective rate was 97. 5% (115/118), Cronbach's α was 0. 896, and the validity ranged 0. 505 -0. 875. The correlation with MLHF was 0. 946 (P <0. 01) , the correlation with NYHA classi- fication was 0. 524 (P <0. 05). The recovery of MLHF was 95. 2% (118/124) , the effective rate was 88. 1%(104/118) , Cronbach's a was 0. 889, and the validity ranged 0. 487 -0. 787. The correlation with NYHA classification was 0. 468 (P <0. 05). Conclusions The C-MLHF had better feasibility, reliability, validity, and relativity between feasibility/reliability and NYHA classification, as compared with MLHF. In conclusion C-MLHF was more suitable for assessing quality of life for Chinese HF patients.
