Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surg Innov ; 31(3): 286-290, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38444075

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although the technique of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has improved remarkably, problems such as limited exposure and instrument collision persist. We describe a new SILC technique that uses a set of specially-designed needle instruments. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with benign gallbladder disease underwent SILC using the newly-designed needle assembly instruments (NAIs). The NAIs comprise an needle assembly exposing hook for operative field exposure and an needle assembly electrocoagulation hook for dissection. During the operation, the NAIs were assembled and disassembled before and after gallbladder removal within the abdominal cavity. The operative efficacy and postoperative complications of this procedure were evaluated. RESULTS: SILC was completed successfully in 52 cases, and four cases (7.14%) required an additional trocar. There were no conversions to open surgery. The mean operative time was 48.2 ± 21.8 min, and the mean operative bleeding volume was 10.5 ± 12.5 mL. Minor postoperative complications occurred in 3 cases, including 2 cases of localized fluid accumulation in the abdominal cavity and 1 case of pulmonary infection, and all of them recovered after conservative treatment. There was no occurrence of bile leak, abdominal bleeding, bile duct injury and incisional hernia. The medical cost of each case was saved by approximately $200. The abdominal scars produced by the needle instruments were negligible. CONCLUSION: NAIs can make SILC safer, more convenient, and less expensive.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Doenças da Vesícula Biliar , Agulhas/efeitos adversos , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/efeitos adversos , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/instrumentação , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/métodos , Doenças da Vesícula Biliar/cirurgia , Duração da Cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Indian Pediatr ; 54(11): 938-941, 2017 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28849763

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy for acute appendicitis in children. METHODS: This study was conducted as a retrospective comparison of hospital records for postoperative complications, duration of operation, and postoperative length of stay between children (aged <18y) who underwent laparoscopic (n=190) or open (n=199) appendectomy over a six-year period. Quality of life was evaluated immediately and 1 month postoperatively. RESULTS: The major complication rate after surgery in laparoscopic group was significantly lower than that of open appendectomy group (13% vs 27%, P<0.05). The mean (SD) postoperative hospital stay was also shorter in laparoscopic group (2.4 (0.6) days vs 3.7 (1.1) days, P<0.05). The postoperative minor complication rate and hospital expenses were not significantly different between the two groups. The duration of surgery was longer in laparoscopic group (P<0.05). Children in laparoscopic group had less postoperative pain and higher quality of life after one month than those in open appendectomy group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic technique seems to be safer than open appendectomy for acute appendicitis in children.


Assuntos
Apendicectomia , Apendicite/epidemiologia , Apendicite/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Apendicectomia/efeitos adversos , Apendicectomia/métodos , Apendicectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...