Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol ; 38(8): 1127-32, 2011 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21603957

RESUMO

Sterility testing is the final, and critical, step in quality control of tissue banking. It informs the decision whether to release the tissue allografts for clinical use, or not. The most common method for sterility testing of structural bone and tendon allografts is to swab using cotton tip streaks. This method provides low recovery efficiency; and therefore may pass allografts with low bioburden, providing false negatives. Our pilot data revealed organism recovery efficiencies of 60, 30 and 100% from cotton swab, membrane filtration and sponge swaps, respectively. Our aim was to develop a high sensitivity sterility test for structural bone and tendon allografts using a sponge sampling method. Eighty-one bone and tendon allograft samples were inoculated with organism suspensions (10(2) or less organisms per 0.1 mL) of Clostridium sporogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans, Bacillus subtilis, Aspergillus niger, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Micrococcus spp. Nasco sponges (4 × 8 cm) were used to aseptically sample the whole surface of allograft samples. The sponges were cut in half and cultured in either tryptone soya or fluid thioglycollate broths for 14 days. Positive culture samples were further examined for microbial morphology. The results showed that the sensitivity of the method, and negative predictive value, is 100% for all inoculated organisms incubated with thioglycollate. We conclude that this sponge sampling method should be applied as the standard for sterility testing of structural bone and tendon allografts.


Assuntos
Osso e Ossos/microbiologia , Esterilização , Tampões de Gaze Cirúrgicos/microbiologia , Tendões/microbiologia , Bancos de Tecidos , Transplante Homólogo , Bacillus subtilis/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Bacillus subtilis/isolamento & purificação , Candida albicans/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Candida albicans/isolamento & purificação , Clostridium/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Clostridium/isolamento & purificação , Meios de Cultura , Técnicas Microbiológicas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolamento & purificação , Controle de Qualidade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Staphylococcus aureus/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação
2.
Cell Tissue Bank ; 9(2): 139-47, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18320354

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: ISO 11137-2006 (ISO 11137-2a 2006) provides a VDmax 15 method for substantiation of 15 kGy as radiation sterilisation dose (RSD) for health care products with a relatively low sample requirement. Moreover, the method is also valid for products in which the bioburden level is less than or equal to 1.5. In the literature, the bioburden level of processed bone allografts is extremely low. Similarly, the Queensland Bone Bank (QBB) usually recovers no viable organisms from processed bone allografts. Because bone allografts are treated as a type of health care product, the aim of this research was to substantiate 15 kGy as a RSD for frozen bone allografts at the QBB using method VDmax 15-ISO 11137-2: 2006 (ISO 11137-2e, Procedure for method VDmax 15 for multiple production batches. Sterilisation of health care products - radiation - part 2: establishing the sterilisation dose, 2006; ISO 11137-2f, Procedure for method VDmax 15 for a single production batch. Sterilisation of health care products - radiation - part 2: establishing the sterilisation dose, 2006). MATERIALS: 30 femoral heads, 40 milled bone allografts and 40 structural bone allografts manufactured according to QBB standard operating procedures were used. METHOD: Estimated bioburdens for each bone allograft group were used to calculate the verification doses. Next, 10 samples per group were irradiated at the verification dose, sterility was tested and the number of positive tests of sterility recorded. If the number of positive samples was no more than 1, from the 10 tests carried out in each group, the verification was accepted and 15 kGy was substantiated as RSD for those bone allografts. RESULTS: The bioburdens in all three groups were 0, and therefore the verification doses were 0 kGy. Sterility tests of femoral heads and milled bones were all negative (no contamination), and there was one positive test of sterility in the structural bone allograft. Accordingly, the verification was accepted. CONCLUSION: Using the ISO validated protocol, VDmax 15, 15 kGy was substantiated as RSD for frozen bone allografts manufactured at the QBB.


Assuntos
Bancos de Ossos , Doses de Radiação , Esterilização/métodos , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Humanos , Queensland , Esporos Bacterianos/isolamento & purificação , Transplante Homólogo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...