Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 59(3): 997-1007, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28697570

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are several position statements and clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for diagnosing dementia. OBJECTIVE: Our aims were to evaluate the adherence to CPG among specialists in the 7 memory clinics included in the Registry of Dementias of Girona (ReDeGi), and to compare the results between 2007-2011 and 2012-2015. We also determined the time and number of visits required to achieve a diagnosis, the supplementary tests ordered, and the drugs prescribed according to dementia subtypes. METHODS: Medical charts of a stratified random sample of 475 ReDeGi cases were reviewed. Basic dementia work-up was evaluated using as a reference evidence-based CPG. An Index of Adherence (AI) was calculated using the following items in the medical chart: cognitive symptomatology; functional disability evaluation; physical examination; neurological examination; psychiatric examination; brief cognitive examination; activities of daily living performance examination; blood test; structural neuroimaging (CT-scan or MRI). RESULTS: The mean AI to CPG among specialists was of 8.2 points, and it improved from 7.9 points in 2007-2011 to 8.5 points in 2012-2015 (Cohen's d = 0.46). A lower adherence was detected in the most severe cases. A dementia diagnosis required 3.5 visits, regardless of the subtype of dementia, although milder cases required more time, more visits, and more supplementary tests than severe cases. CONCLUSION: The adherence to CPG in the catchment area of the ReDeGi is high, and an epidemiological surveillance system such as the ReDeGi may help in improving it. Dementia guidelines should establish procedures adapted to clinical practice, with simplified recommendations for most severe cases.


Assuntos
Demência , Cooperação do Paciente , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Sistema de Registros , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Demência/epidemiologia , Demência/psicologia , Demência/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia
2.
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen ; 27(4): 260-6, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22605780

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Clinical evidence indicates that acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) are not efficacious to treat frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). The British Association for Psychopharmacology recommends avoiding the use of AChEI and memantine in patients with FTLD. METHODS: Cross-sectional design using 1092 cases with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 64 cases with FTLD registered by the Registry of Dementias of Girona. Bivariate analyses were performed, and binary logistic regressions were used to detect variables associated with antidementia drugs consumption. RESULTS: The AChEIs were consumed by 57.6% and 42.2% of the patients with AD and FTLD, respectively. Memantine was used by 17.2% and 10.9% of patients with AD and FTLD, respectively. Binary logistic regressions yielded no associations with antidementia drugs consumption. CONCLUSIONS: There is a discrepancy regarding clinical practice and the recommendations based upon clinical evidence. The increased central nervous system drug use detected in FTLD requires multicentric studies aiming at finding the best means to treat these patients.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Colinesterase/uso terapêutico , Degeneração Lobar Frontotemporal/tratamento farmacológico , Memantina/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Análise de Regressão
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...