Mouthwash as a low-cost and safe specimen transport medium for human papillomavirus DNA testing of cervicovaginal specimens.

The usefulness of mouthwash as a transport medium for cervical specimens for carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing has not been evaluated. Two cervical specimens were collected from each of 34 patients, with one placed in mouthwash (Scope, Proctor and Gamble, Inc.) and the other in a liquid cytology medium commonly used for HPV DNA testing in alternating order. Paired specimens were tested by a PCR assay for carcinogenic HPV and a PCR HPV genotyping assay for 37 HPV types at 0, 3, and 6 weeks after collection; the results of the HPV genotyping assay were categorized into HPV risk groups according to cancer risk (HPV-16 > HPV-18 > other carcinogenic HPV types > noncarcinogenic HPV types > negative). After 4 months of storage, specimens were tested using a second, non-PCR test for carcinogenic HPV. We observed a >or=94% total agreement and kappa values of >or=0.88 between media at each time point for PCR-detected carcinogenic HPV. We observed a >or=74% total agreement, >or=0.62 unweighted kappa, and >or=0.75 linearly weighted kappa between media at each time point for PCR-detected HPV cancer risk category. Finally, we observed an 88% total agreement and kappa of 0.77 between media for carcinogenic HPV detection using a second test after 4 months of storage. We suggest that mouthwash might be used as a low-cost, safe, nonflammable storage and transport medium for cervical specimens for HPV DNA testing in cervical cancer screening programs.

Evaluation of the Hybrid Capture 2 CT/GC DNA tests and the GenProbe PACE 2 tests from the same male urethral swab specimens.

BACKGROUND: A previous study demonstrated that Digene's Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) DNA tests for detection of and (CT/GC) could be performed using cervical swab specimens collected in GenProbe transport media with significantly greater sensitivity for the detection of than with the GenProbe PACE 2 system. GOAL: The goal was to assess the performance of HC2 tests in comparison with GenProbe PACE 2 tests for the detection of CT/GC in male urethral swab specimens. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1,202 male urethral swab specimens were collected in GenProbe PACE transport medium. All specimens were first tested with the PACE 2 system, followed by masked HC2 CT/GC testing. The GenProbe AMPLIFIED CT Assay (AMP CT) and PCR/SHARP Signal System (SHARP) were used for adjudication of discrepant results. RESULTS: The prevalence rates for this population were 8.4% for and 14.6% for, based on the adjudicated results. The relative sensitivity and specificity for the detection of were 97.0% and 99.8% for HC2 and 69.3% and 98.3% for PACE 2, respectively. The relative sensitivities for the detection of were 98.9% for HC2 and 99.4% for PACE 2, with the same specificity of 99.9% for both tests. Agreement between the two testing methods was 95.4% for and 99.6% for. CONCLUSION: The HC2 test is compatible with the GenProbe collection medium, with significantly greater sensitivity than the GenProbe PACE 2 test for detecting and similar sensitivities for detecting.

Comparison of Digene hybrid capture 2 and conventional culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in cervical specimens.

Digene's Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) CT/GC, CT-ID, and GC-ID DNA tests were evaluated by comparison to traditional culture methods for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in 669 cervical specimens from high-risk female populations attending two sexually transmitted disease clinics. For detection of either or both infections, the HC2 CT/GC test algorithm had 93.8% sensitivity and 95.9% specificity compared to those of culture. After resolution of discrepant results by direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) staining or PCR assay, the relative sensitivity and specificity of the HC2 CT/GC test algorithm increased to 94.8 and 99.8%, while the values for culture were 83.6% (McNemar's P value, 0.0062) and 100%, respectively. For detection of the individual pathogens, the relative sensitivities for the HC2 CT-ID and GC-ID tests were 97.2 and 92.2% and the specificities were greater than 99% compared to culture adjucated by DFA staining and PCR. Test performance varied at the two clinics: the HC2 CT/GC algorithm, CT-ID, and GC-ID tests had significantly higher sensitivities (McNemar's P value, <0.05) than that of culture for the population at one clinic as well as for the combined populations. At the other clinic, the HC2 tests performed as well as culture.