Use of healthcare resources and family planning methods 12 months after birth in women of South Auckland: The Healthy Mums and Babies (HUMBA) randomised trial.

AIM: To report the utilisation of healthcare and family planning methods by participants in the Healthy Mums and Babies (HUMBA) trial at 12 months postpartum. METHODS: Surveys on access to 1) healthcare, and 2) family planning methods were completed 1 year following birth by a sample of multi-ethnic women with obesity in South Auckland, New Zealand. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-seven out of two hundred and thirty (55.2%) HUMBA participants completed the surveys. All babies and 99% of the mothers were enrolled with a general practitioner (GP) and over 60% also accessed community or hospital emergency departments. One hundred and twelve (88.2%) used Plunket as their Well Child provider. A discussion on family planning/contraception during or after pregnancy occurred for 123/127 (96.9%) but only 74/127 (58.3%) had family planning/contraception provided after birth. Of the 53 who did not have a family planning/contraception method arranged, 20 (37.7%) did not believe in them. Factors that participants felt would assist access to family planning/contraception services included home visits, weekend or after-hour clinics and a local or mobile clinic. CONCLUSIONS: In this South Auckland population, engagement with primary healthcare and Well Child health providers was almost universal. Family planning/contraception discussions during or after pregnancy were done well. However, provision of family planning/contraception services postpartum could be improved.

Accuracy of point-of-care HbA1c testing in pregnant women.

BACKGROUND: In New Zealand, it is recommended that all pregnant women have a haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) test performed with their booking antenatal bloods to identify previously unrecognised diabetes. However, screening rates in some groups are low. Use of a point-of-care device may improve compliance with screening. AIM: To assess the accuracy of the COBAS b101 point-of-care system referenced against a laboratory method, for measurement of HbA1c levels in pregnant women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Convenience sample of 40 obese pregnant women enrolled in a clinical trial. HbA1c was assayed in paired capillary and venous whole blood samples using the COBAS b101 point-of-care system and Primus Ultra2 high performance liquid chromatography laboratory analyser, respectively. The accuracy of the point-of-care system was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: The mean (SD) laboratory HbA1c was 35.9 (2.0) mmol/mol. The COBAS b101 point-of-care system, compared with the laboratory reference method, had a small negative bias for HbA1c (-1.0 mmol/mol, 95% CI -2.0 to -0.03, P = 0.03) and relatively wide 95% limits of agreement (-7.2 to 5.1 mmol/mol). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we found that in pregnancy, the COBAS b101 point-of-care system has a small negative bias and modest point accuracy for HbA1c. When used to screen for previously unrecognised diabetes in pregnancy, appropriate COBAS b101 HbA1c point-of-care HbA1c thresholds for a negative and positive result are 7 mmol/mol below and 5 mmol/mol above the clinical threshold, respectively. Values between these limits should be confirmed by laboratory testing.

Regimens of fetal surveillance of suspected large-for-gestational-age fetuses for improving health outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Policies and protocols vary widely for fetal surveillance in a pregnancy where the fetus is suspected to be large-for-gestational-age (LGA). All ultimately culminate in decisions about the mode and timing of birth. LGA is known to be associated with increased risks to both the mother and baby. Interventions based on surveillance regimen findings may be associated with risks to the mother and baby. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness or efficacy of different antenatal surveillance methods for the suspected LGA fetus on important health outcomes for the mother and baby. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 August 2015), ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (21 August 2015). SELECTION CRITERIA: Published and unpublished randomised, quasi-randomised and cluster-randomised trials comparing the effects of described antenatal fetal surveillance regimens for women with suspected LGA infants. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We identified no studies that met the inclusion criteria for this review. MAIN RESULTS: There are no included trials. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found no randomised controlled trials that assessed the effect of antenatal fetal surveillance regimens of a suspected LGA fetus on important health outcomes for the mother and baby.There has been a rise in the prevalence of LGA babies over the past few decades in many countries. Research is therefore required on regimens of antenatal surveillance of suspected LGA infants, in order to guide practice and improve the health outcomes for the mother and infant. In particular, randomised control trials to investigate whether serial antenatal clinic and ultrasound assessments of suspected LGA infants (including liquor volume and markers of fetal adiposity) would be useful, to assess whether surveillance methods improve health outcomes. In addition, as there are concerns that identifying suspected LGA fetuses may lead to unnecessary maternal anxiety, investigations and interventions, any such trial would need to assess the risks as well as benefits of regimens of fetal surveillance for suspected LGA fetuses.