National Breast Cancer Audit: ductal carcinoma in situ management in Australia and New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a significant issue in Australia and New Zealand with rising incidence because of the implementation of mammographic screening. Current information on its natural history is unable to accurately predict progression to invasive cancer. In 2003, the National Breast Cancer Centre in Australia published recommendations for DCIS. In Australia and New Zealand, the National Breast Cancer Audit collects information on DCIS cases. This article will examine these recommendations and provide information from the audit on current DCIS management. METHODS: Three thousand six hundred and twenty-nine cases of DCIS were entered by 274 breast surgeons between January 1998 and December 2004. Data items in the National Breast Cancer Audit database that were covered in the National Breast Cancer Centre recommendations were reviewed. Information was available on the following: diagnostic biopsy rates for all cases and mammographically positive cases and rates of breast conserving surgery (BCS), clear margins following BCS, postoperative radiotherapy following BCS for groups at high risk of recurrence as well as axillary procedures and tamoxifen prescription. RESULTS: Close adherence was found in diagnostic biopsy, BCS and clear margin rates. Some high-risk groups received radiotherapy, although women with 'close' margins did not in 33% of cases. Axillary procedures were conducted in 23% of cases and most (81%) patients were not prescribed tamoxifen. CONCLUSION: There was predominantly close adherence to recommendations with three possible areas of improvement: fewer axillary procedures, an appraisal of radiotherapy practice following BCS and more investigation into tamoxifen prescription practices for DCIS.

National breast cancer audit: overview of invasive breast cancer management.

BACKGROUND: The National Breast Cancer Audit is an initiative of the Breast Section of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons collecting surgical information in early breast cancer. It is managed in conjunction with the Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures - Surgical. An overview of results for invasive breast cancer from January 1999 until December 2004 is presented to provide preliminary data for participating surgeons. METHODS: Invasive breast cancer cases were retrieved from the National Breast Cancer Audit database for the 274 participating breast surgeons in Australia and New Zealand. Data for a variety of clinical parameters were analysed to provide an overview of the diagnostic, histological, surgical and adjuvant therapy management issues. RESULTS: There were 25,026 cases of invasive breast cancer. Annual percentages of mammographically detected cancers from 1999 to 2004 did not differ significantly. Breast-conserving surgery rates also remained stable at 60%. Margins were involved in 5% of patients; an additional 9% had final margins of less than 1 mm. Radiotherapy followed breast-conserving surgery in most cases (86%). Patients undergoing mastectomy with large tumours (>5 cm) underwent radiotherapy in 71% of cases. When at least four lymph nodes were positive, radiotherapy followed mastectomy in the majority (75%) of cases. The most frequently carried out axillary procedure was a level 2 dissection. Chemotherapy was received by 78% of oestrogen receptor negative, axillary node positive, postmenopausal patients. Tamoxifen was used in the majority (83%) of oestrogen receptor positive cases. CONCLUSION: Surgeons contributing their invasive breast cancer data show a high quality of treatment. Some further improvement may be possibly related to excision margins and tamoxifen prescription for oestrogen receptor negative cancers. Chemotherapy prescription might also warrant further investigation.

National Breast Cancer Audit: establishing a web-based data system.

BACKGROUND: An audit of surgical treatment of early breast cancer was introduced nationally in 1999. In August 2002, the Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures - Surgical, under the auspices of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, assumed responsibility for managing this audit. This article provides an update of audit activities, now known formally as the National Breast Cancer Audit (NBCA), including a description of the new governance structure and the development of a secure online surgical audit system. METHODS: Major changes have taken place in the design and governance of the NBCA during the last two years. Two committees have been established to oversee the audit. A clinical advisory committee comprises experts from a number of fields including breast surgery, oncology, government, and from peak breast cancer and consumer bodies. A technical advisory committee oversees many of the technical issues that have arisen with the development of an online data entry system. The online system of data entry was developed and launched to surgeons in May 2004. RESULTS: There are now 28,000 cases of primary breast surgery in the audit. Around 250 surgeons are currently participating, an increase of over 50 surgeons since May 2004. Surgeons can review their data using the online system and compare their own results by generating reports which graph their own results against national aggregate data. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a significant increase in the volume of data received since the launch of the secure online system. The governing committees are working towards creating a clinical audit which will provide an improved data entry system and better reporting for all participating surgeons. The NBCA can also serve as a template on which to base other surgical audits.

A systematic review of intraoperative radiotherapy in early breast cancer.

A systematic review was undertaken to assess the safety and efficacy of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in early breast cancer compared with breast conserving surgery with postoperative radiotherapy. Literature databases were searched up to March 2002 inclusive. IORT studies of any design and breast conserving therapy randomised controlled trials with sample sizes greater than 500 patients (with at least one arm of breast conserving therapy (BCT)) and systematic reviews on BCT published since 1992, were included for comparison. Seven unique IORT studies were located; one randomised controlled trial, one study with a concurrent control group and five case series. Minor postoperative complications were reported following IORT. Short-term results were similar for both treatment modalities in terms of local recurrence, disease-free and overall survival. However, the current evidence base is poor, making definitive assessment on IORT very difficult. Further research is required to clarify several issues such as identification of the most appropriate subgroups of patients for IORT, a comparison of the currently available mobile IORT technologies, establishing whether IORT is most appropriate as a boost replacement dose or replacement for all postoperative radiotherapy, the examination of how biological repair processes may differ between the two treatment modalities and determining precisely where local recurrences originate with respect to the original tumour site.